02.01.2014 Views

Agro-Biotechnology: - The Greens | European Free Alliance

Agro-Biotechnology: - The Greens | European Free Alliance

Agro-Biotechnology: - The Greens | European Free Alliance

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Technical problems | Cloned farm animals - a ‚killing application‘? | 13<br />

Many of the observed adverse health impacts are summarised as Large Offspring<br />

Syndrome (LOS). Some effects of LOS are also observed, but at a much<br />

lower rate, in animals derived from embryo transfer in cattle and sheep (EFSA<br />

2008a, FDA, 2008). LOS has been especially observed in clones from species<br />

of cattle and sheep. <strong>The</strong>y often go together with late gestation and give rise to<br />

an increase in perinatal deaths, excess foetal size, abnormal placental development<br />

(including an increased incidence of hydrops 13 ), enlarged internal organs,<br />

increased susceptibility to disease, sudden death, reluctance to suckle and<br />

difficulty in breathing and standing. (EFSA 2008a)<br />

In sheep, cows and mice the following problems were detected (Gjerries &<br />

Vatja, 2005):<br />

• Placental abnormalities<br />

• Foetal overgrowth, prolonged gestation<br />

• Stillbirth, hypoxia, respiratory failure and circulatory problems, lack of<br />

post-natal vigour<br />

• Increased body temperature at birth<br />

• Malformations in the urogenital tract<br />

• Malformations in liver and brain<br />

• Immune dysfunction, a malformation of related organs<br />

• Bacterial and viral infections<br />

In contrast to the LOS syndrome observed in cattle and sheep clones, pigs produced<br />

by SCNT are more likely to show an increased incidence of intrauterine<br />

growth retardation and reduced weight at birth. (EFSA 2008a, FDA, 2008)<br />

<strong>The</strong>re is a lack of understanding of the underlying mechanisms and also there<br />

is no coherent definition for LOS. <strong>The</strong> observers agree that these effects are<br />

mostly relevant for the intrauterine 14 , the perinatal 15 and the neonatal period.<br />

But at a later stage in the first three to six months a high incidence of health<br />

implications has been observed by many authors. All these effects contribute<br />

finally to a low overall rate of success. This low rate of success is also shown in<br />

some of the publications cited by EFSA (2008a) or Gjerries & Vatja (2005):<br />

Panarace et al. (2007): of 3374 embryo clones transferred into surrogate dams,<br />

317 (9 percent) live calves were born, 24 hours after birth 278 of these clones<br />

(8 percent) were alive, and 225 (7 percent) were alive at 150 days or more<br />

after birth.<br />

Wells et al. (2004): of 988 bovine embryo clones transferred into recipient<br />

cows, 133 calves were born and 89 (67 percent) of them survived to weaning<br />

at three months of age.<br />

13 Abnormal accumulation of fluid<br />

14 during pregnancy<br />

15 time before and after birthing

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!