02.01.2014 Views

SOLAR GENERATION - Greenpeace

SOLAR GENERATION - Greenpeace

SOLAR GENERATION - Greenpeace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PART THREE: THE <strong>SOLAR</strong> RACE<br />

State Initiatives in the US<br />

Solar Initiatives in California<br />

California is driving the US market for solar energy almost entirely<br />

because of incentive programs offered through the state’s<br />

electricity suppliers. The main subsidy programs are the California<br />

Energy Commission’s Emerging Renewables Program - which<br />

offers $ 3 per watt towards capital costs and resulted in 3,200 solar<br />

installations in 2003 - the California Public Utility Commission’s<br />

Self-Generation Incentive Program and programs run by Los<br />

Angeles Department of Water and Power and Sacramento<br />

Municipal Utility District. PV installations under these and a<br />

handful of other small programs reached 14 MW in 2002 and 26<br />

MW in 2003, with a total of nearly 79 MW installed by June 2004.<br />

The California Energy Commission has also simplified the rules<br />

and tariffs for net metering, and reduced the paperwork for<br />

interconnection requirements for grid-connected photovoltaic<br />

systems.<br />

San Diego: The city of San Diego has committed to a first-of-itskind<br />

clean energy initiative to meet the city’s growing electricity<br />

demand. Under this plan, San Diego will generate 50 MW of clean<br />

energy over the next ten years to meet the region’s projected<br />

energy shortfalls and stop another energy crisis. The City is<br />

expected to meet the majority of that demand with solar power.<br />

This is the first time a major US city council has initiated such a<br />

plan as the solution to its energy needs, and was a major victory<br />

for the <strong>Greenpeace</strong> Clean Energy Now team.<br />

San Francisco: In November 2001, San Francisco voters approved a<br />

$ 100 million revenue bond for renewable energy and energy<br />

efficiency that pays for itself from the savings, costing taxpayers<br />

nothing. The bond pays for solar panels, wind turbines and energy<br />

efficiency measures for public buildings. The money that would<br />

have gone to buy electricity from power plants instead goes to<br />

finance the bond.<br />

University of California: The university is committed to install 10<br />

MW of solar units across its ten campus network. <strong>Greenpeace</strong> was<br />

instrumental in securing this commitment.<br />

Other State Initiatives<br />

• The state of New Jersey offers a $ 5.50/Wp subsidy for<br />

photovoltaic systems. The Clean Energy Rebate Program has<br />

budgeted $ 16.2 million up to 2008. The program has supported<br />

(or reserved incentives for) 91 projects totalling over 3,300 kW<br />

of power.<br />

• Illinois: LLed by the strong "Brightfields” program in Chicago,<br />

where abandoned ”brownfield" factory sites are converted to<br />

either photovoltaic manufacturing plants (owned and operated<br />

by Spire Corporation) or installed photovoltaic systems. The<br />

state of Illinois passed the largest subsidy in the United States<br />

for photovoltaic systems, $ 6/Wp. Over 1 MW of PV was installed<br />

in the state in 2002.<br />

• New York: New York has agreed over $ 50 million to support<br />

new industry, new installations and studies to accelerate<br />

commercialisation of photovoltaic systems. New York increased<br />

the photovoltaic subsidy to $ 5/W in May 2002 for gridconnected<br />

systems.<br />

• Virginia: Virginia offers a $ 0.75/W cash rebate for installed<br />

photovoltaic modules produced in the state. This program is<br />

capped at $ 6 million per year.<br />

• Connecticut: The Connecticut Clean Energy fund has allocated<br />

$ 5.3 million in subsidies, with $ 5.75/Wp offered for residential<br />

PV systems.<br />

• Nevada: The Nevada Demonstration Program offers up to $ 5/<br />

W for residential, small businesses, Indian tribes and schools.<br />

The program has $ 20 million to distribute over 3 years.<br />

• North Carolina: Carolina offers a 35% tax credit for photovoltaic<br />

system installations.<br />

• Ohio: Support for 50 public schools to have photovoltaic<br />

systems/training modules installed.<br />

Japan<br />

• PV capacity end 2003: 860 MWp<br />

• Support system: Various government programmes, including<br />

grants for domestic PV roofs, and net metering support provided<br />

by utilities<br />

Renewable energy is seen as an indispensable part of Japanese<br />

climate change policy and carbon reduction targets, as well as<br />

an emerging technology to be exploited. Various supportive<br />

policies to encourage growth in the renewables market have<br />

been introduced by the government, including significant solar<br />

research and development programmes from the 1970s<br />

onwards. These policies have received backing from across the<br />

spectrum of public bodies, academics, NGOs and the business<br />

community. Japan now has PV systems on thousands of<br />

schools, hospitals, factories, warehouses, offices, houses and<br />

railway stations.<br />

By the end of 2003 a total of 860 MWp had been installed in<br />

Japan, with government plans for 4.8 GWp by 2010, an<br />

ambitious target requiring an annual growth rate of 30%. The<br />

annual growth rate since 1998 has been up to 45%, however. If<br />

the current trend continues, 70 to 80% of installations in Japan<br />

will be rooftop systems with an average size of 3.8 kWp.<br />

The national Japanese programme is aimed at rapid expansion<br />

in the number of units coupled with a decreasing percentage of<br />

subsidy. The overall goal is to stimulate production, bring prices<br />

down, create market awareness and leave Japanese industry<br />

with a fully economic market which will encourage competitive<br />

exports to the rest of the world. In pursuit of these objectives,<br />

the budget for the residential PV system dissemination<br />

programme was cut from $ 223 million in 2002 to $ 100 million<br />

in 2003, and by a further 50% this year. This reduced the subsidy<br />

per kWp from $ 862/kWp in 2003 to $ 430/kWp in 2004. Even so,<br />

the market has continued to grow, the number of subsidy<br />

applications increased during 2003, while the price for PV<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!