SOLAR GENERATION - Greenpeace
SOLAR GENERATION - Greenpeace
SOLAR GENERATION - Greenpeace
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PART THREE: THE <strong>SOLAR</strong> RACE<br />
State Initiatives in the US<br />
Solar Initiatives in California<br />
California is driving the US market for solar energy almost entirely<br />
because of incentive programs offered through the state’s<br />
electricity suppliers. The main subsidy programs are the California<br />
Energy Commission’s Emerging Renewables Program - which<br />
offers $ 3 per watt towards capital costs and resulted in 3,200 solar<br />
installations in 2003 - the California Public Utility Commission’s<br />
Self-Generation Incentive Program and programs run by Los<br />
Angeles Department of Water and Power and Sacramento<br />
Municipal Utility District. PV installations under these and a<br />
handful of other small programs reached 14 MW in 2002 and 26<br />
MW in 2003, with a total of nearly 79 MW installed by June 2004.<br />
The California Energy Commission has also simplified the rules<br />
and tariffs for net metering, and reduced the paperwork for<br />
interconnection requirements for grid-connected photovoltaic<br />
systems.<br />
San Diego: The city of San Diego has committed to a first-of-itskind<br />
clean energy initiative to meet the city’s growing electricity<br />
demand. Under this plan, San Diego will generate 50 MW of clean<br />
energy over the next ten years to meet the region’s projected<br />
energy shortfalls and stop another energy crisis. The City is<br />
expected to meet the majority of that demand with solar power.<br />
This is the first time a major US city council has initiated such a<br />
plan as the solution to its energy needs, and was a major victory<br />
for the <strong>Greenpeace</strong> Clean Energy Now team.<br />
San Francisco: In November 2001, San Francisco voters approved a<br />
$ 100 million revenue bond for renewable energy and energy<br />
efficiency that pays for itself from the savings, costing taxpayers<br />
nothing. The bond pays for solar panels, wind turbines and energy<br />
efficiency measures for public buildings. The money that would<br />
have gone to buy electricity from power plants instead goes to<br />
finance the bond.<br />
University of California: The university is committed to install 10<br />
MW of solar units across its ten campus network. <strong>Greenpeace</strong> was<br />
instrumental in securing this commitment.<br />
Other State Initiatives<br />
• The state of New Jersey offers a $ 5.50/Wp subsidy for<br />
photovoltaic systems. The Clean Energy Rebate Program has<br />
budgeted $ 16.2 million up to 2008. The program has supported<br />
(or reserved incentives for) 91 projects totalling over 3,300 kW<br />
of power.<br />
• Illinois: LLed by the strong "Brightfields” program in Chicago,<br />
where abandoned ”brownfield" factory sites are converted to<br />
either photovoltaic manufacturing plants (owned and operated<br />
by Spire Corporation) or installed photovoltaic systems. The<br />
state of Illinois passed the largest subsidy in the United States<br />
for photovoltaic systems, $ 6/Wp. Over 1 MW of PV was installed<br />
in the state in 2002.<br />
• New York: New York has agreed over $ 50 million to support<br />
new industry, new installations and studies to accelerate<br />
commercialisation of photovoltaic systems. New York increased<br />
the photovoltaic subsidy to $ 5/W in May 2002 for gridconnected<br />
systems.<br />
• Virginia: Virginia offers a $ 0.75/W cash rebate for installed<br />
photovoltaic modules produced in the state. This program is<br />
capped at $ 6 million per year.<br />
• Connecticut: The Connecticut Clean Energy fund has allocated<br />
$ 5.3 million in subsidies, with $ 5.75/Wp offered for residential<br />
PV systems.<br />
• Nevada: The Nevada Demonstration Program offers up to $ 5/<br />
W for residential, small businesses, Indian tribes and schools.<br />
The program has $ 20 million to distribute over 3 years.<br />
• North Carolina: Carolina offers a 35% tax credit for photovoltaic<br />
system installations.<br />
• Ohio: Support for 50 public schools to have photovoltaic<br />
systems/training modules installed.<br />
Japan<br />
• PV capacity end 2003: 860 MWp<br />
• Support system: Various government programmes, including<br />
grants for domestic PV roofs, and net metering support provided<br />
by utilities<br />
Renewable energy is seen as an indispensable part of Japanese<br />
climate change policy and carbon reduction targets, as well as<br />
an emerging technology to be exploited. Various supportive<br />
policies to encourage growth in the renewables market have<br />
been introduced by the government, including significant solar<br />
research and development programmes from the 1970s<br />
onwards. These policies have received backing from across the<br />
spectrum of public bodies, academics, NGOs and the business<br />
community. Japan now has PV systems on thousands of<br />
schools, hospitals, factories, warehouses, offices, houses and<br />
railway stations.<br />
By the end of 2003 a total of 860 MWp had been installed in<br />
Japan, with government plans for 4.8 GWp by 2010, an<br />
ambitious target requiring an annual growth rate of 30%. The<br />
annual growth rate since 1998 has been up to 45%, however. If<br />
the current trend continues, 70 to 80% of installations in Japan<br />
will be rooftop systems with an average size of 3.8 kWp.<br />
The national Japanese programme is aimed at rapid expansion<br />
in the number of units coupled with a decreasing percentage of<br />
subsidy. The overall goal is to stimulate production, bring prices<br />
down, create market awareness and leave Japanese industry<br />
with a fully economic market which will encourage competitive<br />
exports to the rest of the world. In pursuit of these objectives,<br />
the budget for the residential PV system dissemination<br />
programme was cut from $ 223 million in 2002 to $ 100 million<br />
in 2003, and by a further 50% this year. This reduced the subsidy<br />
per kWp from $ 862/kWp in 2003 to $ 430/kWp in 2004. Even so,<br />
the market has continued to grow, the number of subsidy<br />
applications increased during 2003, while the price for PV<br />
26