Untitled - Greenpeace
Untitled - Greenpeace
Untitled - Greenpeace
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
68<br />
CARVING UP THE CONGO<br />
Carbon missions from fragmentation<br />
and degradation<br />
It is not only the direct effects of deforestation<br />
that causes losses of forest carbon to the<br />
atmosphere: indirect effects are also<br />
important. At present, the global figures used<br />
by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate<br />
Change (IPCC), as well as those used in the UK<br />
Government’s recently published Stern Review<br />
Report on the economics of climate change,<br />
exclude emissions resulting from the<br />
fragmentation of vast areas of intact forests<br />
into smaller areas 423 – for example by logging<br />
roads. Trees on the edges of such fragments<br />
are vulnerable to drought, wind and fire, 424 all<br />
of which can result in death and the release of<br />
stored carbon. In addition, many trees are<br />
inadvertently damaged, even during selective<br />
logging. Similarly, only a small fraction of cut<br />
wood ends up stored in houses or other longlasting<br />
structures which store carbon; the<br />
majority of carbon is lost to the atmosphere<br />
though the decay or burning of waste. 425<br />
These effects combined can be highly<br />
important, and are estimated as being just as<br />
important in terms of carbon emissions as the<br />
direct impacts, if not more so. 426<br />
If left to proceed unhindered, forest regrowth<br />
would eventually (over centuries, rather than<br />
decades) recapture the carbon lost through<br />
fragmentation and degradation. In the<br />
meantime, however, this carbon is in the<br />
atmosphere, contributing to climate change. In<br />
any case, agriculture, rather than forest<br />
regrowth, tends to follow degradation in many<br />
cases, and since crops unlike forests do not<br />
accumulate large amounts of carbon and store<br />
it for long periods, so most of the carbon<br />
emitted through deforestation, fragmentation<br />
and degradation will be permanently lost into<br />
the atmosphere.<br />
Using satellite data, <strong>Greenpeace</strong> has<br />
conservatively predicted the overall carbon<br />
emissions from a 170,000-hectare area logged<br />
by Siforco between 1981and 1998, extracting<br />
some 900,000m 3 of commercial logs (see box<br />
below). 427 The company cleared over 4,000<br />
hectares of lowland rainforest to create a mass<br />
network of feeder logging roads and log<br />
storage facilities. The potential emissions from<br />
forest fragmentation as a result of this<br />
infrastructure were nearly 2.5 times greater<br />
than, and in addition to, those created by<br />
actually extracting the commercial logs. The<br />
©Kim Gjerstad