02.01.2014 Views

Untitled - Greenpeace

Untitled - Greenpeace

Untitled - Greenpeace

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

68<br />

CARVING UP THE CONGO<br />

Carbon missions from fragmentation<br />

and degradation<br />

It is not only the direct effects of deforestation<br />

that causes losses of forest carbon to the<br />

atmosphere: indirect effects are also<br />

important. At present, the global figures used<br />

by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate<br />

Change (IPCC), as well as those used in the UK<br />

Government’s recently published Stern Review<br />

Report on the economics of climate change,<br />

exclude emissions resulting from the<br />

fragmentation of vast areas of intact forests<br />

into smaller areas 423 – for example by logging<br />

roads. Trees on the edges of such fragments<br />

are vulnerable to drought, wind and fire, 424 all<br />

of which can result in death and the release of<br />

stored carbon. In addition, many trees are<br />

inadvertently damaged, even during selective<br />

logging. Similarly, only a small fraction of cut<br />

wood ends up stored in houses or other longlasting<br />

structures which store carbon; the<br />

majority of carbon is lost to the atmosphere<br />

though the decay or burning of waste. 425<br />

These effects combined can be highly<br />

important, and are estimated as being just as<br />

important in terms of carbon emissions as the<br />

direct impacts, if not more so. 426<br />

If left to proceed unhindered, forest regrowth<br />

would eventually (over centuries, rather than<br />

decades) recapture the carbon lost through<br />

fragmentation and degradation. In the<br />

meantime, however, this carbon is in the<br />

atmosphere, contributing to climate change. In<br />

any case, agriculture, rather than forest<br />

regrowth, tends to follow degradation in many<br />

cases, and since crops unlike forests do not<br />

accumulate large amounts of carbon and store<br />

it for long periods, so most of the carbon<br />

emitted through deforestation, fragmentation<br />

and degradation will be permanently lost into<br />

the atmosphere.<br />

Using satellite data, <strong>Greenpeace</strong> has<br />

conservatively predicted the overall carbon<br />

emissions from a 170,000-hectare area logged<br />

by Siforco between 1981and 1998, extracting<br />

some 900,000m 3 of commercial logs (see box<br />

below). 427 The company cleared over 4,000<br />

hectares of lowland rainforest to create a mass<br />

network of feeder logging roads and log<br />

storage facilities. The potential emissions from<br />

forest fragmentation as a result of this<br />

infrastructure were nearly 2.5 times greater<br />

than, and in addition to, those created by<br />

actually extracting the commercial logs. The<br />

©Kim Gjerstad

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!