Gosford City Council Historical Water Quality Review & Analysis

Gosford City Council Historical Water Quality Review & Analysis Gosford City Council Historical Water Quality Review & Analysis

gosford.nsw.gov.au
from gosford.nsw.gov.au More from this publisher
01.01.2014 Views

RESULTS OF WATER QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS 3-19 3.3.2 Bacteria Faecal coliforms, and to a lesser extent Total Coliforms, have been monitored in the Gosford waters as part of past water quality monitoring programs. Laxton has primarily been responsible for monitoring of bacteria at Gosford as part of environment monitoring programs. Bacterial results from Laxton’s 1996 – 1998 monitoring program are presented in Table 3.27. This table shows that the coastal lagoons and the tributary creeks are most susceptible to bacterial contamination, while sites within the broader Brisbane Water estuary are least affected by bacteria. Bacteria is also measured by Council as part of their routine Public Health Monitoring Program. Bacteria in the vicinity of the oyster leases within Brisbane Water are further monitoring under the Shellfish Quality Assurance Program (SQAP). Table 3.27 Faecal Coliform Levels (no. per 100mL) 1996 – 1998 (from Laxton, 1999) Location Median (50%ile) Mean Maximum Wamberal Lagoon 22 319 7500 Terrigal Lagoon 114 341 2500 Avoca Lagoon 19 173 2250 Cockrone Lagoon 31 172 2000 Narara Creek 95 669 10000 Erina Creek 132 507 5000 Kincumber Creek 410 2671 20000 Cockle Broadwater 8 112 1000 Koolewong 3 20 355 Woy Woy 6 29 300 Booker Bay 16 43 250 3.3.3 Algae 3.3.3.1 Algal counts Biological monitoring of Brisbane Water and the coastal lagoons was carried out by Cheng between August 1999 and June 2002 (Ecoscience Technology, 2002). Algal cell count results for the later half of this monitoring period (i.e. Oct 2000 – June 2002) are summarised in Table 3.28. Table 3.28 Algal cell count results 2000 – 2002 (Ecoscience Technology, 2002) Location Minimum Maximum %age over 1000 cells/ml Narara Ck 7 475 0 Erina Ck 6 1021 2 Kincumber Ck 6 13634 40 D:\R.N0754.002.01.DOC 7/11/03 16:11

RESULTS OF WATER QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS 3-20 Cockle Ck 9 212 0 Woy Woy Ck 9 10760 29 Brisbane Water 9 4532 9 Booker Bay 7 6055 7 Wamberal Lagoon 14 803 0 Terrigal Lagoon 11 320 0 Avoca Lagoon 7 1679 2 Cockrone Lagoon 12 500000+ 9 Of particular interest are the results for Cockrone Lagoon. As reported in Ecoscience Technology (2002), Cockrone Lagoon was opened and drained in February 2002 (refer Appendix A for MHL gauging of water levels in Cockrone Lagoon). Following drainage of the lagoon, filamentous bluegreen alga Oscillatoria (and other related species) grew rapidly on the exposed lagoon sediments. The algae remained in high numbers for a week or so until the water level increased following heavy rainfall. Comparisons with the MHL data indicate that dissolved oxygen in the lagoon (or at least at the datasonde location) was very low during the algal bloom (< 2 mg/L), while turbidity levels were high (up to 160 NTU), due to the fragmentation and resuspension of the benthic algae into the water column. Cheng indicates that the entrance openings of the coastal lagoons seem to cause a number of ecological problems, such as massive algal growth (and reduced dissolved oxygen levels), and that the lagoons need to be actively management and monitored to prevent degradation. In particular, Cheng points to better management of entrance openings, to be more sympathetic to lagoon ecology, as a means of minimising future degradation of the coastal lagoons. Further details on biological monitoring of the Gosford Waters are available in Ecoscience Technology (2000, 2002). 3.3.3.2 Chlorophyll-a Chlorophyll-a can be considered as an indicator of algal growth, as it is a measure of the amount of green pigment within the water. Recent research by the University of Newcastle suggests that chlorophyll-a is a good surrogate of the amount of primary productivity within an estuarine waterway (pers comm. Dr A Redden, Uni. of Newcastle). Chlorophyll-a has been monitored within the Gosford waters as part of Laxton’s previous water quality monitoring programs (1993/94, 1996 – 1998). A summary of Laxton’s chlorophyll-a results for the latter of these two programs is shown in Table 3.29. D:\R.N0754.002.01.DOC 7/11/03 16:11

RESULTS OF WATER QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS 3-20<br />

Cockle Ck 9 212 0<br />

Woy Woy Ck 9 10760 29<br />

Brisbane <strong>Water</strong> 9 4532 9<br />

Booker Bay 7 6055 7<br />

Wamberal Lagoon 14 803 0<br />

Terrigal Lagoon 11 320 0<br />

Avoca Lagoon 7 1679 2<br />

Cockrone Lagoon 12 500000+ 9<br />

Of particular interest are the results for Cockrone Lagoon. As reported in Ecoscience Technology<br />

(2002), Cockrone Lagoon was opened and drained in February 2002 (refer Appendix A for MHL<br />

gauging of water levels in Cockrone Lagoon). Following drainage of the lagoon, filamentous bluegreen<br />

alga Oscillatoria (and other related species) grew rapidly on the exposed lagoon sediments.<br />

The algae remained in high numbers for a week or so until the water level increased following heavy<br />

rainfall. Comparisons with the MHL data indicate that dissolved oxygen in the lagoon (or at least at<br />

the datasonde location) was very low during the algal bloom (< 2 mg/L), while turbidity levels were<br />

high (up to 160 NTU), due to the fragmentation and resuspension of the benthic algae into the water<br />

column.<br />

Cheng indicates that the entrance openings of the coastal lagoons seem to cause a number of<br />

ecological problems, such as massive algal growth (and reduced dissolved oxygen levels), and that<br />

the lagoons need to be actively management and monitored to prevent degradation. In particular,<br />

Cheng points to better management of entrance openings, to be more sympathetic to lagoon ecology,<br />

as a means of minimising future degradation of the coastal lagoons.<br />

Further details on biological monitoring of the <strong>Gosford</strong> <strong>Water</strong>s are available in Ecoscience<br />

Technology (2000, 2002).<br />

3.3.3.2 Chlorophyll-a<br />

Chlorophyll-a can be considered as an indicator of algal growth, as it is a measure of the amount of<br />

green pigment within the water. Recent research by the University of Newcastle suggests that<br />

chlorophyll-a is a good surrogate of the amount of primary productivity within an estuarine waterway<br />

(pers comm. Dr A Redden, Uni. of Newcastle).<br />

Chlorophyll-a has been monitored within the <strong>Gosford</strong> waters as part of Laxton’s previous water<br />

quality monitoring programs (1993/94, 1996 – 1998). A summary of Laxton’s chlorophyll-a results<br />

for the latter of these two programs is shown in Table 3.29.<br />

D:\R.N0754.002.01.DOC 7/11/03 16:11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!