01.01.2014 Views

Gosford City Council Historical Water Quality Review & Analysis

Gosford City Council Historical Water Quality Review & Analysis

Gosford City Council Historical Water Quality Review & Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RESULTS OF WATER QUALITY DATA ANALYSIS 3-13<br />

3.1.3 Compound <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Index<br />

Considerable insight to the water quality of the <strong>Gosford</strong> waterways can be obtained through<br />

investigation of the various water quality parameters, as discussed in the preceding Sections of this<br />

report. However, it is most useful to simplify the information into a single parameter, which can be<br />

reported to the community and <strong>Council</strong>lors to give an overall indication of the general water quality<br />

condition.<br />

In order to obtain a ‘Compound <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Index’, the data from a range of water quality<br />

parameters needs to be synthesised and considered concurrently. For each major water quality<br />

parameter, the measured concentration is compared to a criteria set, and categorised into one of four<br />

different ranges. The overall water quality score can be determined by applying a value to each of the<br />

ranges (1 = good; 4 = highly degraded), summing the individual scores, and then dividing by the<br />

number of parameters included in the assessment.<br />

Table 3.22 presents the key water quality parameters and the interim relative ranges (and scores) for<br />

each as applicable to the <strong>Gosford</strong> waterways. Although Chlorophyll-a was not included in the most<br />

recent water quality monitoring program (as described in the previous Sections of this report), it has<br />

been included in the matrix below for future reference, as it is an extremely valuable water quality<br />

indicator that is likely to be included as part of any future monitoring program.<br />

Table 3.22 <strong>Gosford</strong> <strong>Water</strong> <strong>Quality</strong> Index Range Definition Matrix<br />

Parameter Range 1<br />

(value = 1)<br />

Range 2<br />

(value = 2)<br />

Range 3<br />

(value = 3)<br />

Range 4<br />

(value = 4)<br />

Turbidity 0 – 5 NTU 5 – 15 NTU 15 – 30 NTU > 30 NTU<br />

Dissolved Oxygen > 6.5 mg/L 4.0 – 6.5 mg/L 2.0 – 4.0 mg/L < 2.0 mg/L<br />

Ammonia 0 – 0.01 mg/L 0.01 – 0.03 mg/L 0.03 – 0.05 mg/L > 0.05 mg/L<br />

Oxidised Nitrogen 0 – 0.02 mg/L 0.02 – 0.05 mg/L 0.05 – 0.10 mg/L > 0.10 mg/L<br />

Total Nitrogen 0 – 1.0 mg/L 1.0 – 1.5 mg/L 1.5 – 2.0 mg/L > 2.0 mg/L<br />

Orthophosphate 0 –0.01 mg/L 0.01 – 0.03 mg/L 0.03 – 0.05 mg/L > 0.05 mg/L<br />

Total Phosphorus 0 – 0.05 mg/L 0.05 – 0.10 mg/L 0.10 – 0.20 mg/L > 0.20 mg/L<br />

Chlorophyll-a 0 – 2 µg/L 2 – 5 µg/L 5 – 10 µg/L > 10 µg/L<br />

<strong>Water</strong>ways that exhibit water quality concentrations within Range 1 can be considered to be in<br />

relatively good condition (with respect to water quality at least). If waterways start to exhibit a large<br />

number of Range 3 or Range 4 values, then it would tend to indicate a more degraded system (which<br />

is likely to have follow-on effects to the general aquatic ecosystem). The values provided in Table<br />

3.22 are intended to provide a more sites-specific assessment of water quality, as recommended by<br />

ANZECC (2000). In determining the values, consideration was given to the default trigger values for<br />

physical and chemical stressors (as defined in ANZECC, 2000), along with an appreciation of the<br />

historical water quality results.<br />

D:\R.N0754.002.01.DOC 7/11/03 16:11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!