01.01.2014 Views

Gosford City Council Historical Water Quality Review & Analysis

Gosford City Council Historical Water Quality Review & Analysis

Gosford City Council Historical Water Quality Review & Analysis

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

INTRODUCTION 1-7<br />

The guidelines provide trigger values for freshwater and marine water. The guidelines recommended<br />

moving away from relying solely on chemical guideline values for managing water quality, to using<br />

an integrated approach which would involve chemical-specific guidelines coupled with water quality<br />

monitoring, direct toxicity assessment, and biological monitoring. This approach ensures that water<br />

management will focus on protecting the environment instead of focussing on meeting a number.<br />

The trigger values provided by the ANZECC (2000) guidelines are presented as three grades of<br />

trigger values; high, moderate or low reliability. These grades are dependent on the amount of data<br />

available and hence the confidence or reliability of the final figure. Trigger values have also been<br />

derived for four different protection levels; 99%, 95%, 90% and 80%. The protection level signifies<br />

the percentage of species expected to be protected by monitoring concentrations below the define<br />

values. These values were derived using the statistical distribution method.<br />

1.3.5 Toxicants in Sediment<br />

Sediment are important in aquatic ecosystems as they are a source and sink for dissolved<br />

contaminants, they influence surface water quality, and they are a source of bioavailable<br />

contaminants to benthic biota. Consequently it is important to identify areas were sediments present a<br />

likely threat to ecosystem health. Recommended guideline values are provided as interim sediment<br />

quality guideline (ISQG) values. Guidelines are not specified for some contaminants, which reflects<br />

the absence of an adequate data set for that contaminant. A value for this contaminant can be derived<br />

based on the natural background concentration multiplied by an appropriate factor (a value between 2<br />

and 3 is recommended).<br />

1.3.6 Application<br />

A framework is provided for the application of guidelines for the protection of aquatic ecosystems.<br />

The initial step involves two stages, which are common for the application of all of the indicator types<br />

(biological, physiochemical, chemical and sediment);<br />

1 determine the type of water body, the environmental values, the level of protection required, the<br />

environmental concerns, the factors that are affecting the ecosystem and the management goals;<br />

and<br />

2 select the indicator types depending on the first step and then determining the appropriate trigger<br />

values.<br />

For the remaining steps it is convenient to consider guidelines application separately for biological<br />

indicators and non-biological indicators (physical and chemical stressors and toxicants in water and<br />

sediments). For biological indicators decision trees are used to derive the water quality guidelines.<br />

Non-biological indicators are based on given water quality guidelines, however, there is the option to<br />

refine guidelines using a decision tree. The ANZECC (2000) guidelines detail the method to derive<br />

appropriate guidelines for a specific site, instead of using the trigger values provided within the<br />

guidelines.<br />

D:\R.N0754.002.01.DOC 7/11/03 16:11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!