Biodiversity Strategy - Gosford City Council - NSW Government
Biodiversity Strategy - Gosford City Council - NSW Government Biodiversity Strategy - Gosford City Council - NSW Government
A - 7.0 ISSUES FOR BIODIVERSITY This section considers the factors that impact on biodiversity in Gosford City as residential and other development in the area continues to expand and pressures on native habitats and species increase. Key points • There is a range of threats that may reduce biodiversity values in Gosford City. • Major threats include land clearing, fragmentation of native vegetation, introduced plants and animals that impact on natural systems, degradation and pollution of waterways, recreational and commercial use of natural resources and climate change. • Almost 30 key threatening processes have been identified at state level that are relevant to Gosford City. • These threats continue to increase in the area although early detection and action (particularly for feral animals and weeds) may reduce the severity of future impacts. • Actions such as protecting and restoring corridor linkages, improving the condition of bushland and waterways as well as controlling feral animals such as foxes will improve the chances of survival of native species. • This is particularly important because of the challenges for biodiversity associated with climate change. A - 7.1 Introduction The Central Coast continues to experience population growth. Increasing density in residential areas, land subdivision (in particular of rural and scenic protection zoned lands), the desire for larger dwellings and associated works and the need for bushfire protection all place pressure on limited land area. Greater population numbers are being planned for with an expected increase of 30,000 people in the Gosford LGA by 2050 under the State government’s regional plan. As human activity increases, so too the pressures on native species and ecosystems continue to escalate. Further, remaining bushland is under threat from a number of other impacts such as weed invasion and consequent loss of species diversity. Feral and introduced animals such as foxes prey on a range of native species whilst others such as introduced birds and feral bees reduce habitat areas by occupying valuable tree hollows. Figures 7.1 – 7.3 Increasing urbanisation can result in increasing impacts on riparian areas such as this urban creek in Umina and foreshore areas adjacent to Avoca Lagoon. (R. Lonie). Biodiversity - Technical Report Page 153
Almost thirty key threatening processes are now identified at a State and Commonwealth level. These include predation by introduced species such as the European red fox, feral cat and by plague or Mosquito Fish (Gambusia holbrooki). Others are competition and land degradation from introduced species (such as feral rabbits, goats and honey bees), clearing and degradation of native vegetation including riverbank vegetation, invasion by introduced plants (such as bitou bush and exotic grasses), entanglement and ingestion of debris such as plastics by marine animals, high frequency fire and human induced climate change. Finally, it is noted that pressures that have been identified may alter in level of threat and new issues may emerge, especially as scientific knowledge develops. These are some of the major challenges for Council in its role of managing and protecting biodiversity in Gosford City. Figures 7.4-7.6 Stormwater channel in Somersby area that leads to Piles Creek, weed invasion by climbers in bushland area and a degraded natural creekline. A - 7.2 Habitat Loss and Fragmentation of Native Vegetation Increasing fragmentation and loss of remaining bushland areas increases the pressure on native species. This occurs both directly from loss of habitat and food resources and from more indirect pressures such as the inability to migrate to other suitable areas in times of fire and drought, or for species to interbreed. New bushfire regulations have also resulted in the need for greater cleared areas around properties, leading to more habitat loss. Vegetation mapping recently undertaken for GCC by Bell (2004) demonstrates the increasingly fragmented nature of bushland areas, particularly in the coastal parts of the City. As development pressures and property values increase native vegetation in the Central Coast is continually being lost. Increasing fragmentation including tracks and roads through or adjacent to vegetated areas also leads to declining health of remnant vegetation through impacts such as edge effects and increased weed invasion. “Edge effects” are also the result of fragmentation whereby bushland areas close to urbanisation are more vulnerable to impacts such as weed invasion. Roads, particularly major roads and freeways, railways powerline and other easements generally contribute to a loss of biodiversity. Foxes, for example, favour roads and tracks as movement corridors. As well as the direct loss of animals killed on roads, road kills may also impact significantly on native species as they attract predators such as foxes to feed on roadkill. Some vegetation communities are also more vulnerable to impacts from fragmentation, edge effects and increased frequency of bushfire. Also many areas of remnant vegetation occur on private lands and often do not have an appropriate landuse zoning. Eventually these remnants will be lost through gradual incremental losses associated with development and landuse. Even properties that are largely vegetated or have a good canopy of mature trees over time are degraded through clearing and modification for land uses associated with residential use. These include landscaping around houses, horse or other grazing on rural properties, construction of sheds and other structures around the dwelling, paving, swimming pools and tennis courts and the like. Unauthorised underscrbbing and unauthorised grazing also occurs on Conservation (7a) zoned lands. Biodiversity - Technical Report Page 154
- Page 105 and 106: Biodiversity - Technical Report Pag
- Page 107 and 108: There have been few quantitative st
- Page 109 and 110: • Rainforest • Wetlands • Dun
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 5.5 Endangered ecological co
- Page 113 and 114: of streams for water quality purpos
- Page 115 and 116: Figures 5.5 - 5.7 Waratah (Telopea
- Page 117 and 118: A - 5.4 A - 5.4.1 Terrestrial Fauna
- Page 119 and 120: A - 5.4.3 Invertebrates There conti
- Page 121 and 122: A draft Recovery Plan has been prep
- Page 123 and 124: assumption that occupancy of a site
- Page 125 and 126: Variables such as ‘proportion of
- Page 127 and 128: Mount Kincumba to Bouddi NP and Cop
- Page 129 and 130: A - 5.7 References Anon (1996) 'Sev
- Page 131 and 132: Scotts D (1991) “Old-growth fores
- Page 133 and 134: A - 6.2 Aquatic Habitats A - 6.2.1
- Page 135 and 136: considered. This is true for all ri
- Page 137 and 138: this zone are isolated Casuarina gl
- Page 139 and 140: The Hawkesbury River The Hawkesbury
- Page 141 and 142: Gulls (Larus novaehollandiae); Pied
- Page 143 and 144: Patonga Creek Little information is
- Page 145 and 146: A particular objective of the above
- Page 147 and 148: northeast lies the suburb of North
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 6.11 Weedy Seadragon (Phyllo
- Page 151 and 152: Lisarow Wetland Lisarow Wetland is
- Page 153 and 154: • appropriately timed collection
- Page 155: A - 6.3 References ANZECC (1992) Au
- Page 159 and 160: Whilst these two species appear mor
- Page 161 and 162: Low (1999) surmised that this fungu
- Page 163 and 164: A - 7.8 Fire Management Fire manage
- Page 165 and 166: 1. Salinity mediated processes - Sa
- Page 167 and 168: • Structural flood mitigation wor
- Page 169 and 170: Increased needs for active recreati
- Page 171 and 172: A - 7.14 References Anderson, C (20
Almost thirty key threatening processes are now identified at a State and Commonwealth level.<br />
These include predation by introduced species such as the European red fox, feral cat and by<br />
plague or Mosquito Fish (Gambusia holbrooki). Others are competition and land degradation<br />
from introduced species (such as feral rabbits, goats and honey bees), clearing and degradation<br />
of native vegetation including riverbank vegetation, invasion by introduced plants (such as bitou<br />
bush and exotic grasses), entanglement and ingestion of debris such as plastics by marine<br />
animals, high frequency fire and human induced climate change. Finally, it is noted that<br />
pressures that have been identified may alter in level of threat and new issues may emerge,<br />
especially as scientific knowledge develops. These are some of the major challenges for<br />
<strong>Council</strong> in its role of managing and protecting biodiversity in <strong>Gosford</strong> <strong>City</strong>.<br />
Figures 7.4-7.6<br />
Stormwater channel in Somersby area that leads to Piles Creek, weed invasion by<br />
climbers in bushland area and a degraded natural creekline.<br />
A - 7.2<br />
Habitat Loss and Fragmentation of Native Vegetation<br />
Increasing fragmentation and loss of remaining bushland areas increases the pressure on<br />
native species. This occurs both directly from loss of habitat and food resources and from more<br />
indirect pressures such as the inability to migrate to other suitable areas in times of fire and<br />
drought, or for species to interbreed. New bushfire regulations have also resulted in the need for<br />
greater cleared areas around properties, leading to more habitat loss.<br />
Vegetation mapping recently undertaken for GCC by Bell (2004) demonstrates the increasingly<br />
fragmented nature of bushland areas, particularly in the coastal parts of the <strong>City</strong>. As<br />
development pressures and property values increase native vegetation in the Central Coast is<br />
continually being lost. Increasing fragmentation including tracks and roads through or adjacent<br />
to vegetated areas also leads to declining health of remnant vegetation through impacts such as<br />
edge effects and increased weed invasion. “Edge effects” are also the result of fragmentation<br />
whereby bushland areas close to urbanisation are more vulnerable to impacts such as weed<br />
invasion. Roads, particularly major roads and freeways, railways powerline and other<br />
easements generally contribute to a loss of biodiversity. Foxes, for example, favour roads and<br />
tracks as movement corridors. As well as the direct loss of animals killed on roads, road kills<br />
may also impact significantly on native species as they attract predators such as foxes to feed<br />
on roadkill.<br />
Some vegetation communities are also more vulnerable to impacts from fragmentation, edge<br />
effects and increased frequency of bushfire. Also many areas of remnant vegetation occur on<br />
private lands and often do not have an appropriate landuse zoning. Eventually these remnants<br />
will be lost through gradual incremental losses associated with development and landuse. Even<br />
properties that are largely vegetated or have a good canopy of mature trees over time are<br />
degraded through clearing and modification for land uses associated with residential use. These<br />
include landscaping around houses, horse or other grazing on rural properties, construction of<br />
sheds and other structures around the dwelling, paving, swimming pools and tennis courts and<br />
the like. Unauthorised underscrbbing and unauthorised grazing also occurs on Conservation<br />
(7a) zoned lands.<br />
<strong>Biodiversity</strong> - Technical Report Page 154