Biodiversity Strategy - Gosford City Council - NSW Government

Biodiversity Strategy - Gosford City Council - NSW Government Biodiversity Strategy - Gosford City Council - NSW Government

gosford.nsw.gov.au
from gosford.nsw.gov.au More from this publisher
01.01.2014 Views

The smaller creeks of Gosford are generally neglected with few resources allocated for their management. Most are choked with weeds. In January 1996 Gosford City Council initiated a water quality monitoring program of Brisbane Water, the Coastal Lagoons and tributary Creeks. Monitoring of the three major tributary creeks, Kincumber, Narara and Erina showed poor results, especially after rainfall. AWT was commissioned to undertake a focussed survey with the objective to identify major point source pollution contributors into the creeks to assist Council to develop management strategies to target problem areas. The project was undertaken in three stages. Stage 1 comprised a community consultation process and field investigation to establish issues relating to water quality in the catchment, and establish the values the community holds for the creeks and the associated catchments (AWT, 2000). Stage 2 was a broad scale sampling program to identify tributaries with elevated pollutant levels (AWT, 2001). Stage 3 was initially going to further localise areas with elevated pollutant levels, but due to results found throughout the project, it was found that the most appropriate outcome for stage 3 was an outline of how Council could proceed with the reduction of stormwater runoff impacts into the future (AWT, 2002). The consultation process identified values common in all three catchments. Residents see the value of the creeks in terms of active and passive recreation, ecological requirements for biodiversity, commercial uses, and cultural and historical significance. The local community feels that these values have been degraded or lost as a result of degraded water quality, altered drainage patterns, sediment erosion, weed growth, increased litter, plant debris and urban development. The stage 2 sampling program found that the primary issues for the creeks are elevated turbidity levels leading to siltation, poor or restricted stream flow and its follow on effects such as low dissolved oxygen and proliferation of iron bacteria, and elevated levels of faecal coliforms during wet, and sometimes dry weather. The results found are typical of streams impacted upon by urban development. Further sampling was concluded to be of little additional value in terms of localizing pollution sources. Stage 3 is a report to guide the management actions in terms of stormwater quantity and quality. It outlines the issues, causes and impacts of stormwater, and how to deal with the issues and causes in a long term approach. It recommends that any water quality or catchment monitoring programs should follow the approach proposed by ANZECC (2000) whereby direct measures of impacts are made rather than impacts and issues inferred on the basis of chemical measurements. Once issues are identified, decisions on how to address the issues need to be made. The guiding principles behind stormwater impact reduction are well documented. The first priority is to contain or remove the pollutant at the source. That is, pollution prevention rather than pollution treatment. This can be achieved through measures such as: • education of polluters to stop pollution before it enters the water cycle; • education in appropriate use of fertilisers; • education of pet owners to collect and dispose of animal wastes. • development, implementation and enforcement of appropriate pollution control policies and legislation eg sediment and erosion control on development sites, restrictions on developments near watercourses, nutrient control policies, fines for illegal rubbish and litter disposal; • sealing gravel roads and road verges or compaction and maintenance to reduce potential for erosion; Biodiversity - Technical Report Page 149

• appropriately timed collection of litter in Council bins; and • on-site containment and appropriate disposal. While source controls (non-structural and structural) should be considered as the first option for stormwater impact reduction, these measures would generally not be sufficient to completely halt the transport of most pollutants. Measures to treat stormwater and remove pollutants instream will inevitably be required. This is the Treatment Train Approach to stormwater management described in the Gosford City Council Stormwater Management Plan (GCC, 1999). In general, the treatment of stormwater should, where possible, reduce the quantity of stormwater entering receiving water bodies and allow filtration to remove particulates and dissolved pollutants. This is a significant change in approach from the long-held concept of rapid removal of stormwater to reduce the potential for flooding, however there is an obvious need to balance stormwater velocity retarding approaches with the potential of the approach to increase flooding. The approach can be taken at any point in the drainage line however the process is most efficient (in terms of pollutant reduction/removal) when implemented on a small scale where there is also likely to be less likelihood of increased flooding. Some of the approaches that can be used to this end include: • collection of rainwater where it falls; • top of catchment infiltration; • structural options for top of catchment removal/capture; • in-line/end of line capture/treatment; and • management of receiving water bodies. The NSW Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources has produced the Geomorphic Categorisation of streams within the Central Coast Catchment Management Board Area (Cook, 2004). The objective of the Geomorphic Assessment was to provide an appraisal of geomorphic condition and a prioritisation of management efforts based upon a whole of catchment assessment. It was based on the River Styles® Framework, which is procedure that aims for consistent and comparable assessment of a river’s biophysical health. This approach is recognised Australia wide as an effective simple step-by-step procedure to achieve consistent and comparable results: • it assesses river character and behaviour and most importantly allows for the developmentof a rating based around a stream’s recovery potential; and • it categorises stream reaches based on the biophysical characteristics such as the planform, channel geometry and the surrounding assemblage of vegetation and landforms (recognising that fluvial systems are zones of biological, physical and chemical interaction between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems). The most dominant stream type in the Gosford area is the meandering sand bed stream that occurs generally around the mid to lower reaches of the catchment and is very sensitive to change. In sand bed streams riparian vegetation and large woody debris or snags play a very important role in both the physical and ecological functions of the river system. Riparian vegetation assists in stabilizing stream channels and often represents the only mechanism contributing to the formation and maintenance of pools and riffles via scouring of the bed and sediment trapping and retention. The loss of these natural controls could result in dramatic changes to channel structure and the loss of habitat essential for the functioning of a healthy stream. Biodiversity - Technical Report Page 150

• appropriately timed collection of litter in <strong>Council</strong> bins; and<br />

• on-site containment and appropriate disposal.<br />

While source controls (non-structural and structural) should be considered as the first option for<br />

stormwater impact reduction, these measures would generally not be sufficient to completely<br />

halt the transport of most pollutants. Measures to treat stormwater and remove pollutants instream<br />

will inevitably be required. This is the Treatment Train Approach to stormwater<br />

management described in the <strong>Gosford</strong> <strong>City</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Stormwater Management Plan (GCC,<br />

1999).<br />

In general, the treatment of stormwater should, where possible, reduce the quantity of<br />

stormwater entering receiving water bodies and allow filtration to remove particulates and<br />

dissolved pollutants. This is a significant change in approach from the long-held concept of<br />

rapid removal of stormwater to reduce the potential for flooding, however there is an obvious<br />

need to balance stormwater velocity retarding approaches with the potential of the approach to<br />

increase flooding. The approach can be taken at any point in the drainage line however the<br />

process is most efficient (in terms of pollutant reduction/removal) when implemented on a small<br />

scale where there is also likely to be less likelihood of increased flooding. Some of the<br />

approaches that can be used to this end include:<br />

• collection of rainwater where it falls;<br />

• top of catchment infiltration;<br />

• structural options for top of catchment removal/capture;<br />

• in-line/end of line capture/treatment; and<br />

• management of receiving water bodies.<br />

The <strong>NSW</strong> Department of Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources has produced the<br />

Geomorphic Categorisation of streams within the Central Coast Catchment Management Board<br />

Area (Cook, 2004). The objective of the Geomorphic Assessment was to provide an appraisal of<br />

geomorphic condition and a prioritisation of management efforts based upon a whole of<br />

catchment assessment. It was based on the River Styles® Framework, which is procedure that<br />

aims for consistent and comparable assessment of a river’s biophysical health.<br />

This approach is recognised Australia wide as an effective simple step-by-step procedure to<br />

achieve consistent and comparable results:<br />

• it assesses river character and behaviour and most importantly allows for the<br />

developmentof a rating based around a stream’s recovery potential; and<br />

• it categorises stream reaches based on the biophysical characteristics such as the<br />

planform, channel geometry and the surrounding assemblage of vegetation and<br />

landforms (recognising that fluvial systems are zones of biological, physical and<br />

chemical interaction between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems).<br />

The most dominant stream type in the <strong>Gosford</strong> area is the meandering sand bed stream that<br />

occurs generally around the mid to lower reaches of the catchment and is very sensitive to<br />

change. In sand bed streams riparian vegetation and large woody debris or snags play a very<br />

important role in both the physical and ecological functions of the river system. Riparian<br />

vegetation assists in stabilizing stream channels and often represents the only mechanism<br />

contributing to the formation and maintenance of pools and riffles via scouring of the bed and<br />

sediment trapping and retention. The loss of these natural controls could result in dramatic<br />

changes to channel structure and the loss of<br />

habitat essential for the functioning of a healthy stream.<br />

<strong>Biodiversity</strong> - Technical Report Page 150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!