Biodiversity Strategy - Gosford City Council - NSW Government
Biodiversity Strategy - Gosford City Council - NSW Government Biodiversity Strategy - Gosford City Council - NSW Government
The Recovery Plan for the species states that the major threat is through habitat reduction and alteration. On the Central Coast localised threats are fragmentation of habitat and isolation of populations due to urban development, such as through subdivisions in suitable coastal habitat that have the potential to disrupt movement, isolate habitat and remove food sources (NPWS 2003a). Yellow-bellied Gliders have been identified as being a possible indicator or umbrella species for effective management of forest-dependent fauna (Milledge et. al. 1991, Kavanagh 1991, Goldingay and Kavanagh 1993, Kavanagh and Bamkin 1995) quoted in NPWS 2003. The Recovery Plan states “The presence or absence of such species can indicate habitat quality for a range of other species or communities and can be targeted when managing and designing conservation reserves so that greater amounts of habitat will be provided for species with smaller home ranges (Goldingay and Kavanagh 1991, Goldingay and Possingham 1995). A further advantage of the Yellow-bellied Glider as an indicator or umbrella species is that habitat requirements relate to measurable features of the forest overstorey that are easily mapped (Kavanagh 1991).” Kavanagh (1991) recommended that large gliders and owls be used as target or indicator species for forest management and provides three main reasons for this. The first is that there is not enough time, skilled people or financial resources to produce wildlife habitat models for all species where they occur. Secondly that some species are more sensitive than others to management regimes and there is a need to bias reserve considerations in their favour (ie loss of old growth forest). Thirdly, he cites issues of practical implementation and the fact that preferred habitat for these species can be readily mapped. Survey records and distribution modelling for the Yellow-bellied Glider have been considerably advanced in Gosford City through a research project that was sponsored by Council (Hawkins 2004). Surveys undertaken for this project resulted in 16 new presence and 62 absence sites. This project provided a refined habitat model based on the vegetation mapping prepared by Bell (2004) and the regional model (Whittle et. al. 2004). This maps high probability of occurrence and known presence records in the eastern part of the LGA with major areas being the Bouddi peninsular, Kincumba Mountain and Katandra Reserve/Wambina Reserve and other areas in Matcham/Holgate. Linkages between these areas and through to other major habitat areas is considered critical for the species viability. Koalas The Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) was identified as a vulnerable species at State level in. Major threats are habitat loss by clearing and tree dieback, and death and injury by cars and dog attacks. Records for Koalas in the Gosford LGA are largely within the Brisbane Water National Park although there are some records in Point Clare, Erina Heights, Lisarow, Matcham and Kulnura. Recent sightings have been around Patonga and Pearl Beach, along the National Park boundary to the west in Umina Beach and Woy Woy and in the Kulnura area but there are other records in the broader peninsular area (NPWS Atlas data). There is also a recent record at Erina Heights (D. Beckers pers comm. 2004). A NSW survey in 1986-87 (Reed et al. 1990) found that Koala distribution was closely linked to tree species that were restricted to high nutrient soils such as river valleys which have been extensively cleared for agriculture. A local Koala Survey and Habitat Mapping project was carried out for Brisbane Water National Park and Popran National Park (Ecotone 1996). The report stated that the Brisbane Water Koala colony could be considered to possibly represent the largest coastal population between the Hunter River, south to the Victorian border and should therefore be regarded as extremely significant. Biodiversity - Technical Report Page 117
A draft Recovery Plan has been prepared for the species (NPWS 2003b). This includes recommendations for identifying and conserving important Koala habitat, preparation of Koalas Plans of Management, road design and signage, and surveys and further research. State Environmental Planning Policy No 44 - Koala Habitat Protection also applies to the assessment and protection of core Koala habitat. Potential Koala habitat is described as areas of native vegetation where listed trees constitute as least 15% of the total number of trees in the upper or lower strata of the tree component. In considering development proposals Council must consider whether potential Koala habitat exists and if so whether the area is core Koala habitat that is an area with a resident population of Koalas, evidenced by attributes such as breeding females and recent and historical records of a population. The impact of fire including high intensity bushfire is identified as a threat to Koalas, both through direct death or injury from fire in the canopy and reduced areas for foraging. Also it may alter flora species composition. Ecotone note that a severe fire could kill a large proportion of the Brisbane Water NP population, such as occurred in the Port Stephens area in 1994 when 6,000 hectares of known or potential Koala habitat was burnt. After this fire, volunteers found 46 dead and 53 live Koalas (NPWS 2003b). Dogs and cars are identified as major threats, particularly in existing residential areas as the animals come down at night-time to move to other feed trees. Dog attacks can also occur in backyards as Koalas can climb fences and may cross yards to get to feed trees. Even a quick bite from a dog may be enough to kill a koala as their skin is very pliable and internal organs are easily punctured (The Australian Koala Foundation Newsletter June 1996). Ecotone (1996) also note the importance of coastal flats which historically would probably have provided prime feeding historically and the fact that these areas are not represented in National Park estate. The report recommends planting of food trees in disturbed areas such as the former sanitary depot near Ettalong Swamp within Brisbane Water National Park. A combined tree planting campaign is recommended (DEC and GCC) in areas known to be koala habitat. Areas in Patonga, Pearl Beach, Umina Beach and Woy Woy may be identified. It is noted that recent works by Council along the Ettymalong or Kahibah Creek involved tree removal within the creek bank but involved supplementary tree planting on the higher banks and elsewhere in this area as well as extensive bush regeneration (GCC 2003). List of Koala browse trees for Gosford Eucalyptus punctata - Grey gum (this appears to be the principal feed tree preferred by Koalas in the Gosford area, see Ecotone 1996). E. robusta Swamp Mahogany E. tereticornis - Forest Red Gum E botryoides - Bangalay E. piperita - Sydney Peppermint E. paniculata - Grey Ironbark Native species that are rare in the area but may be food trees: E amplifolia - Cabbage Gum E. longifolia - Woollybutt Planting of Swamp Mahoganies would also benefit other species as they are an important food resource in the winter months. A migratory species from Tasmania, Swift Parrots () were recorded utilising swamp mahoganies in the Umina Beach area in xx. Swamp mahoganies are known to be an important species for at least ten threatened species including the Regent Honeyeater (), Grey Headed Flying Fox and Biodiversity - Technical Report Page 118
- Page 69 and 70: Council commissioned the Bush Stone
- Page 71 and 72: education and training opportunitie
- Page 73 and 74: of urban development applications w
- Page 75 and 76: Unmanaged cattle grazing can impact
- Page 77 and 78: Three public schools in the catchme
- Page 79 and 80: Milestone 5 - Monitoring and Report
- Page 81 and 82: A - 3.4 References Australian Museu
- Page 83 and 84: (see Figure 4. 3) which accounts fo
- Page 85 and 86: Newcastle and forms a major barrier
- Page 87 and 88: Mooney Mooney and Mangrove Creeks.
- Page 89 and 90: Aeolian Landscapes Beach Landscapes
- Page 91 and 92: A - 4.5 Climate Generally the clima
- Page 93 and 94: Kangaroo, possums, flying squirrels
- Page 95 and 96: A - 4.9 Current Landuse Since the 1
- Page 97 and 98: State government is also preparing
- Page 99 and 100: A - 5.0 TERRESTRIAL BIODIVERSITY Th
- Page 101 and 102: Lily) was once relatively widesprea
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 5.1 Native vegetation commun
- Page 105 and 106: Biodiversity - Technical Report Pag
- Page 107 and 108: There have been few quantitative st
- Page 109 and 110: • Rainforest • Wetlands • Dun
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 5.5 Endangered ecological co
- Page 113 and 114: of streams for water quality purpos
- Page 115 and 116: Figures 5.5 - 5.7 Waratah (Telopea
- Page 117 and 118: A - 5.4 A - 5.4.1 Terrestrial Fauna
- Page 119: A - 5.4.3 Invertebrates There conti
- Page 123 and 124: assumption that occupancy of a site
- Page 125 and 126: Variables such as ‘proportion of
- Page 127 and 128: Mount Kincumba to Bouddi NP and Cop
- Page 129 and 130: A - 5.7 References Anon (1996) 'Sev
- Page 131 and 132: Scotts D (1991) “Old-growth fores
- Page 133 and 134: A - 6.2 Aquatic Habitats A - 6.2.1
- Page 135 and 136: considered. This is true for all ri
- Page 137 and 138: this zone are isolated Casuarina gl
- Page 139 and 140: The Hawkesbury River The Hawkesbury
- Page 141 and 142: Gulls (Larus novaehollandiae); Pied
- Page 143 and 144: Patonga Creek Little information is
- Page 145 and 146: A particular objective of the above
- Page 147 and 148: northeast lies the suburb of North
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 6.11 Weedy Seadragon (Phyllo
- Page 151 and 152: Lisarow Wetland Lisarow Wetland is
- Page 153 and 154: • appropriately timed collection
- Page 155 and 156: A - 6.3 References ANZECC (1992) Au
- Page 157 and 158: Almost thirty key threatening proce
- Page 159 and 160: Whilst these two species appear mor
- Page 161 and 162: Low (1999) surmised that this fungu
- Page 163 and 164: A - 7.8 Fire Management Fire manage
- Page 165 and 166: 1. Salinity mediated processes - Sa
- Page 167 and 168: • Structural flood mitigation wor
- Page 169 and 170: Increased needs for active recreati
The Recovery Plan for the species states that the major threat is through habitat reduction<br />
and alteration. On the Central Coast localised threats are fragmentation of habitat and<br />
isolation of populations due to urban development, such as through subdivisions in<br />
suitable coastal habitat that have the potential to disrupt movement, isolate habitat and<br />
remove food sources (NPWS 2003a).<br />
Yellow-bellied Gliders have been identified as being a possible indicator or umbrella<br />
species for effective management of forest-dependent fauna (Milledge et. al. 1991,<br />
Kavanagh 1991, Goldingay and Kavanagh 1993, Kavanagh and Bamkin 1995) quoted in<br />
NPWS 2003. The Recovery Plan states “The presence or absence of such species can<br />
indicate habitat quality for a range of other species or communities and can be targeted<br />
when managing and designing conservation reserves so that greater amounts of habitat<br />
will be provided for species with smaller home ranges (Goldingay and Kavanagh 1991,<br />
Goldingay and Possingham 1995). A further advantage of the Yellow-bellied Glider<br />
as an indicator or umbrella species is that habitat requirements relate to measurable<br />
features of the forest overstorey that are easily mapped (Kavanagh 1991).”<br />
Kavanagh (1991) recommended that large gliders and owls be used as target or indicator<br />
species for forest management and provides three main reasons for this. The first is that<br />
there is not enough time, skilled people or financial resources to produce wildlife habitat<br />
models for all species where they occur. Secondly that some species are more sensitive<br />
than others to management regimes and there is a need to bias reserve considerations in<br />
their favour (ie loss of old growth forest). Thirdly, he cites issues of practical<br />
implementation and the fact that preferred habitat for these species can be readily<br />
mapped.<br />
Survey records and distribution modelling for the Yellow-bellied Glider have been<br />
considerably advanced in <strong>Gosford</strong> <strong>City</strong> through a research project that was sponsored by<br />
<strong>Council</strong> (Hawkins 2004). Surveys undertaken for this project resulted in 16 new presence<br />
and 62 absence sites. This project provided a refined habitat model based on the<br />
vegetation mapping prepared by Bell (2004) and the regional model (Whittle et. al. 2004).<br />
This maps high probability of occurrence and known presence records in the eastern part<br />
of the LGA with major areas being the Bouddi peninsular, Kincumba Mountain and<br />
Katandra Reserve/Wambina Reserve and other areas in Matcham/Holgate. Linkages<br />
between these areas and through to other major habitat areas is considered critical for the<br />
species viability.<br />
Koalas<br />
The Koala (Phascolarctos cinereus) was identified as a vulnerable species at State level<br />
in. Major threats are habitat loss by clearing and tree dieback, and death and injury by<br />
cars and dog attacks. Records for Koalas in the <strong>Gosford</strong> LGA are largely within the<br />
Brisbane Water National Park although there are some records in Point Clare, Erina<br />
Heights, Lisarow, Matcham and Kulnura. Recent sightings have been around Patonga<br />
and Pearl Beach, along the National Park boundary to the west in Umina Beach and Woy<br />
Woy and in the Kulnura area but there are other records in the broader peninsular area<br />
(NPWS Atlas data). There is also a recent record at Erina Heights (D. Beckers pers<br />
comm. 2004).<br />
A <strong>NSW</strong> survey in 1986-87 (Reed et al. 1990) found that Koala distribution was closely<br />
linked to tree species that were restricted to high nutrient soils such as river valleys which<br />
have been extensively cleared for agriculture. A local Koala Survey and Habitat Mapping<br />
project was carried out for Brisbane Water National Park and Popran National Park<br />
(Ecotone 1996). The report stated that the Brisbane Water Koala colony could be<br />
considered to possibly represent the largest coastal population between the Hunter River,<br />
south to the Victorian border and should therefore be regarded as extremely significant.<br />
<strong>Biodiversity</strong> - Technical Report Page 117