Biodiversity Strategy - Gosford City Council - NSW Government
Biodiversity Strategy - Gosford City Council - NSW Government Biodiversity Strategy - Gosford City Council - NSW Government
Biodiversity - Technical Report Page 103
There have been few quantitative studies of the condition of native vegetation in Gosford City. A report on the COSS found that 20% of the total COSS lands (at that time 2,000ha) were impacted by weeds (Manidis Roberts 1992). The Gosford Rainforest Study (Payne 2002) found that lantana had increased significantly since 1987, and that where previously a few metres existed at the rainforest edge, that this was now well over 100 metres in depth in some areas. Condition mapping (i.e. extent of tracks and clearing, bush fire or other regrowth) is not available for the Gosford study at this stage, nor is there any mapping describing the extent of weed invasion. A - 5.2.3 Significant Vegetation Communities Vegetation mapping enables an assessment to be made about the extent and proportion of native vegetation communities and their relative conservation significance, this is best done within a regional context. The Regional Biodiversity Conservation Strategy (LHCCREMS 2003) provides a conservation assessment for the region, considering national, state and local significant vegetation communities. For national significance, no locally occurring vegetation communities have been listed so far under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999. However, Environment Australia provides criteria to identify communities that could qualify under this category. The Regional Biodiversity Conservation Strategy assessed all regional vegetation communities against national criteria (see Table 5.6) and identified a number of communities that would qualify for national significance. Of the communities identified, only Beach Spinifex (Map Unit 53) and Alluvial Tall Moist Forest (Map Unit 5) are not now likely to be covered under the new determinations for endangered ecological communities at NSW State level. Figures 5.2 – 5.4 Dune vegetation protects foreshore dunes and provides habitat for species such as the coastal pigface (Carpobrotus glaucescens) and coastal wattle (Acacia sophorae) (R. Lonie). Table 5.6 Criteria for assessing national significance CRITERIA Ctiterion 1 Critically endangered = very severe decline = 95% or more (1C) Endangered = a severe decline = 90% or more (1E) Vulnerable - substantial decline = 70% or more (1V) Criterion 2 REASON FOR SIGNIFICANCE Decline in geographic distribution Small geographic distribution coupled with demonstrable threat. This category applies only to vegetation communities with distributions that are small on a national scale. Biodiversity - Technical Report Page 104
- Page 55 and 56: A - 2.6 References Australian Local
- Page 57 and 58: • Bushcare Program - ongoing •
- Page 59 and 60: A - 3.2 Appraisal of biodiversity p
- Page 61 and 62: Officer Table 3.2. Area of properti
- Page 63 and 64: and sub-communities and to provide
- Page 65 and 66: the Central Coast. The returned sur
- Page 67 and 68: Council received funding for develo
- Page 69 and 70: Council commissioned the Bush Stone
- Page 71 and 72: education and training opportunitie
- Page 73 and 74: of urban development applications w
- Page 75 and 76: Unmanaged cattle grazing can impact
- Page 77 and 78: Three public schools in the catchme
- Page 79 and 80: Milestone 5 - Monitoring and Report
- Page 81 and 82: A - 3.4 References Australian Museu
- Page 83 and 84: (see Figure 4. 3) which accounts fo
- Page 85 and 86: Newcastle and forms a major barrier
- Page 87 and 88: Mooney Mooney and Mangrove Creeks.
- Page 89 and 90: Aeolian Landscapes Beach Landscapes
- Page 91 and 92: A - 4.5 Climate Generally the clima
- Page 93 and 94: Kangaroo, possums, flying squirrels
- Page 95 and 96: A - 4.9 Current Landuse Since the 1
- Page 97 and 98: State government is also preparing
- Page 99 and 100: A - 5.0 TERRESTRIAL BIODIVERSITY Th
- Page 101 and 102: Lily) was once relatively widesprea
- Page 103 and 104: Figure 5.1 Native vegetation commun
- Page 105: Biodiversity - Technical Report Pag
- Page 109 and 110: • Rainforest • Wetlands • Dun
- Page 111 and 112: Figure 5.5 Endangered ecological co
- Page 113 and 114: of streams for water quality purpos
- Page 115 and 116: Figures 5.5 - 5.7 Waratah (Telopea
- Page 117 and 118: A - 5.4 A - 5.4.1 Terrestrial Fauna
- Page 119 and 120: A - 5.4.3 Invertebrates There conti
- Page 121 and 122: A draft Recovery Plan has been prep
- Page 123 and 124: assumption that occupancy of a site
- Page 125 and 126: Variables such as ‘proportion of
- Page 127 and 128: Mount Kincumba to Bouddi NP and Cop
- Page 129 and 130: A - 5.7 References Anon (1996) 'Sev
- Page 131 and 132: Scotts D (1991) “Old-growth fores
- Page 133 and 134: A - 6.2 Aquatic Habitats A - 6.2.1
- Page 135 and 136: considered. This is true for all ri
- Page 137 and 138: this zone are isolated Casuarina gl
- Page 139 and 140: The Hawkesbury River The Hawkesbury
- Page 141 and 142: Gulls (Larus novaehollandiae); Pied
- Page 143 and 144: Patonga Creek Little information is
- Page 145 and 146: A particular objective of the above
- Page 147 and 148: northeast lies the suburb of North
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 6.11 Weedy Seadragon (Phyllo
- Page 151 and 152: Lisarow Wetland Lisarow Wetland is
- Page 153 and 154: • appropriately timed collection
- Page 155 and 156: A - 6.3 References ANZECC (1992) Au
<strong>Biodiversity</strong> - Technical Report Page 103