an engineering geological characterisation of tropical clays - GBV

More documents

Recommendations

Info

112 Black clays Cohesion c´ (kN/m²) 60,00 50,00 40,00 30,00 20,00 10,00 0,00 n = 41 Cohesion vs Cr 1 1,1 1,2 1,3 1,4 1,5 1,6 Rel. Consistency, Cr Figure 7.6c. Correlation between cohesion (c´ ) and relative consistency, Cr, of black clays. A poor correlation (R = 0,30) is obtained by relating shear angles and plasticity indices of the clays (Fig. 7.7a). A slight improvement in correlation is obtained by plotting the shear angles against the reciprocal of plasticity indices (Fig. 7.8a); but once again, the strength of correlation is still low (R = 0,32). Black clays Angle of shear resistance φ´ (°) 35 n = 41 R² = 0,09 30 25 20 15 10 35,015 40,015 45,015 50,015 55,015 60,015 Plasticity index PI (%) Shear angle vs PI Figure 7.7a. Correlation between angle of shear resistance (φ´ ) and plasticity index (PI) of black clays.
113 Black clays Cohesion c´ (kN/m²) 60,00 n = 41 50,00 40,00 30,00 20,00 10,00 0,00 40 45 50 55 Plasticity index PI (%) Cohesion vs PI Fig. 7.7b. Correlation between cohesion (c´ ) & plasticity index (PI) of black clays. Black clays Angle of shear resistance φ´ (°) 35 n = 41 30 25 20 R² = 0,102 15 10 0,015 0,020 0,025 0,030 Reciprocal of plasticity index 1/P Shear angle vs 1/PI Figure 7.8a. Correlation between angle of shear resistance (φ´ ) and reciprocal of plasticity index (1/PI) of black clays. Black clays Cohesion c´ (kN/m²) 60,00 50,00 n = 41 40,00 30,00 20,00 10,00 0,00 0,018 0,020 0,022 0,024 0,026 1/PI Cohesion vs 1/PI Figure 7.8b. Correlation between cohesion (c´ ) and reciprocal of plasticity index (1/PI) of black clays.
Page 1 and 2:
AN ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL CHARACTER
Page 3 and 4:
i Contents Page Acknowledgements Su
Page 5 and 6:
iii Chapter 8. Distribution of inde
Page 7 and 8:
v 7.29 - 7.33 Correlation between s
Page 9 and 10:
vii 136 139 7.13 Compressibility cl
Page 11 and 12:
ix Acknowledgements I would like to
Page 13 and 14:
1 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope
Page 15 and 16:
Figure1.1 Map of Nairobi region sho
Page 17 and 18:
5 Plates 1.2 (a) & (b) Strong shrin
Page 19 and 20:
7 Available literature in the form
Page 21 and 22:
9 slopes. The northern boundary bet
Page 23 and 24:
11 1.6 Climate The Nairobi area and
Page 25 and 26:
13 marked daily range of relative h
Page 27 and 28:
15 Chapter 2 Previous works 2.1 Sum
Page 29 and 30:
17 Table 2.1 Stratigraphic correlat
Page 31 and 32:
19 Chapter 3 Geology 3.1 Introducti
Page 33:
21 metamorphic minerals sillimanite
Page 37 and 38:
25 and prismatic apatite occur as a
Page 39 and 40:
27 Table 3.2 Chemical analyses of s
Page 41 and 42:
29 caused by partial segregation of
Page 44 and 45:
32 could otherwise lead to erroneou
Page 46 and 47:
34 The red soils in this study occu
Page 48 and 49:
36 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6
Page 50 and 51:
38 4.4 Vane test 4.4.1 Introduction
Page 52 and 53:
40 Table 4.1 Classification of soft
Page 54 and 55:
42 The variation of vane shear stre
Page 56 and 57:
44 And thirdly, the field vane appa
Page 58:
46 horizon, most probably a result
Page 61 and 62:
49 The red friable clays on the who
Page 63 and 64:
51 Results of chemical analyses of
Page 65 and 66:
53 Results of previous soil classif
Page 67 and 68:
55 neighbouring metamorphic areas a
Page 69 and 70:
57 Table 5.10. Profile description
Page 71 and 72:
59 The presence of BaO in the red a
Page 73 and 74: 61 resulted most probably from supp
Page 75 and 76: 63 800 Impulse 700 600 500 SC 17 -5
Page 77 and 78: 65 sericite and chlorite (see next
Page 79 and 80: 67 Q: Quartz (1%) H: Haematite K: K
Page 81 and 82: 69 Plate 6.3. K-feldspar phenocryst
Page 83 and 84: 71 The trachytes generally show a r
Page 85 and 86: 73 Plate 6.16. Organic matter (rema
Page 87 and 88: 75 Plate 6.24. Solution pores/ cavi
Page 89 and 90: 77 Plate 6.29. Iron concretion with
Page 91 and 92: 79 The CS-225 is a micro-processor
Page 93 and 94: 81 The red soils generally exhibit
Page 95 and 96: 83 Chapter 7 Laboratory soils index
Page 97 and 98: 85 According to Johnson and Degraff
Page 99 and 100: 87 Table 7.2. Results of index test
Page 101 and 102: 89 Plate 7.2a. Apparatus for liquid
Page 103 and 104: 91 Activity chart Plasticity index
Page 105 and 106: 93 Table 7.3 (continued). Atterberg
Page 107 and 108: 95 where 7.1.4.4 Results V = volume
Page 109 and 110: 97 A standard classification of soi
Page 111 and 112: 99 Table 7.6. Viscosity and density
Page 113 and 114: 101 Table 7.7, continued. Results o
Page 115 and 116: 103
Page 117 and 118: 105 Plate 7.7a. Shear testing showi
Page 119 and 120: 107 Shear stress / Displacement Cur
Page 121 and 122: 109 Table 7.10. Distribution and/ o
Page 123: 111 illustrated in Figures 7.6, 7.7
Page 127 and 128: 115 7.4 Oedometer consolidation tes
Page 129 and 130: 117 The compound coefficient, K/ρw
Page 131 and 132: 119 Primary consolidation is a time
Page 133 and 134: 121 where w (%) = moisture content
Page 135 and 136: 123 Relationships between values of
Page 137 and 138: 125 Plate 7.8. Oedometer consolidat
Page 139 and 140: 127 Cumulative log-time/settlement
Page 141 and 142: 129 Ranges of values of coefficient
Page 143 and 144: 131 is most probably due to the ten
Page 145 and 146: 133 The results of correlation show
Page 147 and 148: 135 by differences in lithology, mi
Page 149 and 150: 137 Black clays and red soils Swell
Page 151 and 152: 139 Testing procedure involved cutt
Page 153 and 154: 141 Black clays Swelling pressure S
Page 155 and 156: 143 Black clays: P (kPa) vs S (%) P
Page 157 and 158: 145 The same relationship is repres
Page 159 and 160: 147 Alternatively, percentage swell
Page 161 and 162: 149 Combined sample results: S % vs
Page 163 and 164: 151 Black clays: Greek method P% =
Page 165 and 166: 153 partly produced by effects of w
Page 167 and 168: 155 Chapter 8 Distribution of index
Page 169 and 170: 157 the study area, respectively. R
Page 171 and 172: 159 Liquid limit variation; 0,50m a
Page 173 and 174: 161 Liquid limit (LL) variation (>
Page 175 and 176:
163 (8.6). The few isolated patches
Page 177 and 178:
165 Similarly, soil thicknesses of
Page 179 and 180:
167 Free swell variation; 0,50m dep
Page 181 and 182:
169 fraction at the two depth inter
Page 183 and 184:
171 Variation of fines (%), < 0,50m
Page 185 and 186:
173 %coarse % coarse fraction varia
Page 187 and 188:
175 1°19´S 22 Shear angle variati
Page 189 and 190:
177 9.2 Grain size distribution The
Page 191 and 192:
179 rapid dissipation of pore water
Page 193 and 194:
Chapter 10 181 Correlation of index
Page 195 and 196:
183 Black clays; plasticity index/
Page 197 and 198:
185 On the other hand, laboratory m
Page 199 and 200:
187 Red clays; measured/ calculated
Page 201 and 202:
189 These two relationships could b
Page 203 and 204:
191 Diagram: PImeasured/ PIcalculat
Page 205 and 206:
193 Table 10.5, continued. Calculat
Page 207 and 208:
195 Table 10.6. Calculated and labo
Page 209 and 210:
197 The swelling capability in term
Page 211 and 212:
199 Free swell/ clay fraction Free
Page 213 and 214:
201 There has also been a decrease
Page 215 and 216:
203 PI = 1,88*LS A comparison of pl
Page 217 and 218:
205 cc = 0,0099(122-LL) for black c
Page 219 and 220:
207 Chapter 12 Recommendations Anal
Page 221 and 222:
209 cc = 0,0099(122-LL) for black c
Page 223 and 224:
211 References Abebe, S. T., 2002.
Page 225 and 226:
213 Galster, R.W., 1977. A system o
Page 227 and 228:
215 Mitchell, J.K., 1993. Fundament
Page 229 and 230:
217 ------,1964. Long term stabilit
Page 231 and 232:
Appendix A: Oedometer consolidation
Page 233 and 234:
Table A7. Consolidation parameters
Page 235 and 236:
Results of swelling tests on black
Page 237 and 238:
Appendix D Distribution/ variation
Page 239 and 240:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
Page 241 and 242:
4000 3000 2000 1000 Distance (m) We
Page 243 and 244:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
Page 245 and 246:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
Page 247 and 248:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
Page 249 and 250:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
Page 251 and 252:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
Page 253 and 254:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
Page 255 and 256:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
Page 257 and 258:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
Page 259 and 260:
Appendix E Geotechnical soil map of
show all

an engineering geological characterisation of tropical clays - GBV

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?