88 Table 7.2, continued. Results <strong>of</strong> index tests performed on black <strong>clays</strong> <strong>an</strong>d red soils in this study. Pr<strong>of</strong>ile Sample No. Wn (%) LL (%) PL (%) PI (%) Cr LI FS (%) LS (%) PI/LL class (BS 1377) Consistency SD1-30cm 26,5 82,3 35,9 46,4 1,203 -0,2 125 26 CV semi-solid D SD1-50cm 27,1 83 36,1 46,9 1,19 -0,19 130 27 MV-CV semi-solid SD1-80cm 29,5 91,1 41,7 49,4 1,248 -0,25 140 26 ME-CE semi-solid (black <strong>clays</strong>) SD5-30cm 26,2 83,5 36,4 47,1 1,217 -0,22 125 26 CV semi-solid SD5-50cm 27,4 84,2 36,4 47,9 1,188 -0,19 130 27 CV semi-solid SD5-80cm 29,7 92,3 42 50,4 1,243 -0,24 140 27 ME-CE semi-solid SD7-30cm 26,9 84,3 36,4 48 1,198 -0,2 110 27 CV semi-solid SD7-50cm 27,1 85,9 37,1 48,8 1,205 -0,2 140 26 CV semi-solid SD7-70cm 29,5 90,8 38,7 52,1 1,177 -0,18 135 26 CV semi-solid SD17-30cm 20,1 83,8 39,9 43,9 1,451 -0,45 120 24 CV semi-solid SD17-50cm 21,5 83,9 34,5 49,4 1,263 -0,26 130 25 CV semi-solid SD25-30cm 21,7 80,1 41,3 38,9 1,503 -0,5 125 25 MV semi-solid SD25-50cm 21,1 84,4 39,8 44,6 1,419 -0,42 135 25 MV semi-solid SD29-30cm 17,5 85,3 37,9 47,4 1,429 -0,43 125 27 CV semi-solid SD29-50cm 21,5 86 35,2 50,8 1,268 -0,27 145 26 CV semi-solid SD33-30cm 19,8 84,6 37,3 47,3 1,37 -0,37 125 27 CV semi-solid SD33-50cm 21 85,6 35,4 50,2 1,287 -0,29 145 25 CV semi-solid SD41-30cm 23,2 84,9 39,3 45,6 1,353 -0,35 130 26 CV semi-solid SD41-50cm 24,7 90 41,2 48,8 1,338 -0,34 135 26 CV semi-solid SE1-30cm 23,7 82,2 34,6 47,6 1,229 -0,23 125 23 CV semi-solid E SE1-50cm 27,1 84,9 37,3 47,6 1,214 -0,21 135 24 CV semi-solid SE1-70cm 29,9 90,8 39,3 51,5 1,181 -0,18 145 25 CE semi-solid (black <strong>clays</strong>) SE5-30cm 24,6 84,7 37 47,8 1,258 -0,26 125 24 CV semi-solid SE5-50cm 26,9 85,5 37,9 47,6 1,23 -0,23 130 25 CV semi-solid SE5-70cm 29,1 92,2 42,1 50 1,261 -0,26 145 26 MV semi-solid SE13-30cm 20,8 85,8 39,1 46,7 1,391 -0,39 125 24 CV semi-solid SE13-50cm 23,5 88,6 39,9 48,7 1,338 -0,34 130 25 CV semi-solid SE21-30cm 25,2 88,1 39 49,1 1,281 -0,28 125 25 CV semi-solid SE21-50cm 25,7 90,1 40,7 49,4 1,304 -0,3 145 26 MV semi-solid SE29-30cm 21,8 80,9 35,5 45,5 1,301 -0,3 120 25 CV semi-solid SE29-50cm 23 82,5 36 46,5 1,279 -0,28 120 26 CV semi-solid SE37-30cm 20,8 84,6 37 47,6 1,339 -0,34 125 24 CV semi-solid SE37-50cm 21,8 85,4 37,8 47,6 1,337 -0,34 130 25 CV semi-solid SE41-30cm 22 86,7 39,8 46,8 1,381 -0,38 135 25 MV semi-solid SE41-50cm 20,9 87,5 40 47,5 1,403 -0,4 135 26 MV semi-solid Rd1 -30cm 39,4 48,6 30,7 17,9 0,512 0,49 20 10 MI s<strong>of</strong>t Red soils Rd1-100cm 24,2 51,1 30,6 20,5 1,316 -0,32 15 11 MH semi-solid Rd1-200cm 24,3 49,4 29,6 19,8 1,27 -0,27 20 11 MI-MH semi-solid Rd1-400cm 25,1 47,7 30 17,7 1,278 -0,28 15 11 MI semi-solid Rd2-30cm 37,9 53,3 34,7 18,6 0,826 0,17 20 10 MH stiff Rd2-100cm 26 56,8 34,4 22,4 1,372 -0,37 15 11 MH semi-solid Rd2-200cm 25,4 54,3 33,2 21,1 1,369 -0,37 15 11 MH semi-solid Rd2-400cm 26,1 53,3 33,9 19,4 1,401 -0,4 15 11 MH semi-solid
89 Plate 7.2a. Apparatus for liquid limit determination <strong>of</strong> soil. Plate7.2b. Liquid limit determination showing V-shaped groove in soil sample. The numerical difference beween the liquid limit (LL) <strong>an</strong>d plastic limit (PL) was calculated to give the plasticity index (PI) <strong>of</strong> the soil, i.e. PI = LL – PL (7.5) Results <strong>of</strong> liquid limit tests obtained for the soils in this study are reported to the nearest whole number (1%) alongside those <strong>of</strong> plastic limit <strong>an</strong>d plasticity index in Table (7.2). 7.1.3.4 Evaluation <strong>an</strong>d application <strong>of</strong> results Results <strong>of</strong> Atterberg limits obtained in this study have been used for physical classification <strong>of</strong> the clay soils found (Fig. 7.1), based on the st<strong>an</strong>dard plasticity chart or A-line chart (Draft revision <strong>of</strong> CP 2001; BS 1377: 1975). The clay soils have been classified into one <strong>of</strong> five categories <strong>of</strong> low plasticity (CL), medium plasticity (CI), high plasticity (CH), very high plasticity (CV) or extremely high plasticity (CE). Similarly, the silty varieties <strong>of</strong> soils have been correspondingly classified <strong>an</strong>d denoted by ML, MI, MH, MV, or ME. In Fig. (7.1), the black <strong>clays</strong> involved in this study have been classified as very high to extremely high plasticity inorg<strong>an</strong>ic <strong>clays</strong> (CV, CE) <strong>an</strong>d silty <strong>clays</strong> (MV, ME) while the red soils wholly plot below the A-line <strong>an</strong>d fall in the class <strong>of</strong> medium to high plasticity silts <strong>an</strong>d silty <strong>clays</strong> (MI, MH).
- Page 1 and 2:
AN ENGINEERING GEOLOGICAL CHARACTER
- Page 3 and 4:
i Contents Page Acknowledgements Su
- Page 5 and 6:
iii Chapter 8. Distribution of inde
- Page 7 and 8:
v 7.29 - 7.33 Correlation between s
- Page 9 and 10:
vii 136 139 7.13 Compressibility cl
- Page 11 and 12:
ix Acknowledgements I would like to
- Page 13 and 14:
1 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Scope
- Page 15 and 16:
Figure1.1 Map of Nairobi region sho
- Page 17 and 18:
5 Plates 1.2 (a) & (b) Strong shrin
- Page 19 and 20:
7 Available literature in the form
- Page 21 and 22:
9 slopes. The northern boundary bet
- Page 23 and 24:
11 1.6 Climate The Nairobi area and
- Page 25 and 26:
13 marked daily range of relative h
- Page 27 and 28:
15 Chapter 2 Previous works 2.1 Sum
- Page 29 and 30:
17 Table 2.1 Stratigraphic correlat
- Page 31 and 32:
19 Chapter 3 Geology 3.1 Introducti
- Page 33:
21 metamorphic minerals sillimanite
- Page 37 and 38:
25 and prismatic apatite occur as a
- Page 39 and 40:
27 Table 3.2 Chemical analyses of s
- Page 41 and 42:
29 caused by partial segregation of
- Page 44 and 45:
32 could otherwise lead to erroneou
- Page 46 and 47:
34 The red soils in this study occu
- Page 48 and 49:
36 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6
- Page 50 and 51: 38 4.4 Vane test 4.4.1 Introduction
- Page 52 and 53: 40 Table 4.1 Classification of soft
- Page 54 and 55: 42 The variation of vane shear stre
- Page 56 and 57: 44 And thirdly, the field vane appa
- Page 58: 46 horizon, most probably a result
- Page 61 and 62: 49 The red friable clays on the who
- Page 63 and 64: 51 Results of chemical analyses of
- Page 65 and 66: 53 Results of previous soil classif
- Page 67 and 68: 55 neighbouring metamorphic areas a
- Page 69 and 70: 57 Table 5.10. Profile description
- Page 71 and 72: 59 The presence of BaO in the red a
- Page 73 and 74: 61 resulted most probably from supp
- Page 75 and 76: 63 800 Impulse 700 600 500 SC 17 -5
- Page 77 and 78: 65 sericite and chlorite (see next
- Page 79 and 80: 67 Q: Quartz (1%) H: Haematite K: K
- Page 81 and 82: 69 Plate 6.3. K-feldspar phenocryst
- Page 83 and 84: 71 The trachytes generally show a r
- Page 85 and 86: 73 Plate 6.16. Organic matter (rema
- Page 87 and 88: 75 Plate 6.24. Solution pores/ cavi
- Page 89 and 90: 77 Plate 6.29. Iron concretion with
- Page 91 and 92: 79 The CS-225 is a micro-processor
- Page 93 and 94: 81 The red soils generally exhibit
- Page 95 and 96: 83 Chapter 7 Laboratory soils index
- Page 97 and 98: 85 According to Johnson and Degraff
- Page 99: 87 Table 7.2. Results of index test
- Page 103 and 104: 91 Activity chart Plasticity index
- Page 105 and 106: 93 Table 7.3 (continued). Atterberg
- Page 107 and 108: 95 where 7.1.4.4 Results V = volume
- Page 109 and 110: 97 A standard classification of soi
- Page 111 and 112: 99 Table 7.6. Viscosity and density
- Page 113 and 114: 101 Table 7.7, continued. Results o
- Page 115 and 116: 103
- Page 117 and 118: 105 Plate 7.7a. Shear testing showi
- Page 119 and 120: 107 Shear stress / Displacement Cur
- Page 121 and 122: 109 Table 7.10. Distribution and/ o
- Page 123 and 124: 111 illustrated in Figures 7.6, 7.7
- Page 125 and 126: 113 Black clays Cohesion c´ (kN/m
- Page 127 and 128: 115 7.4 Oedometer consolidation tes
- Page 129 and 130: 117 The compound coefficient, K/ρw
- Page 131 and 132: 119 Primary consolidation is a time
- Page 133 and 134: 121 where w (%) = moisture content
- Page 135 and 136: 123 Relationships between values of
- Page 137 and 138: 125 Plate 7.8. Oedometer consolidat
- Page 139 and 140: 127 Cumulative log-time/settlement
- Page 141 and 142: 129 Ranges of values of coefficient
- Page 143 and 144: 131 is most probably due to the ten
- Page 145 and 146: 133 The results of correlation show
- Page 147 and 148: 135 by differences in lithology, mi
- Page 149 and 150: 137 Black clays and red soils Swell
- Page 151 and 152:
139 Testing procedure involved cutt
- Page 153 and 154:
141 Black clays Swelling pressure S
- Page 155 and 156:
143 Black clays: P (kPa) vs S (%) P
- Page 157 and 158:
145 The same relationship is repres
- Page 159 and 160:
147 Alternatively, percentage swell
- Page 161 and 162:
149 Combined sample results: S % vs
- Page 163 and 164:
151 Black clays: Greek method P% =
- Page 165 and 166:
153 partly produced by effects of w
- Page 167 and 168:
155 Chapter 8 Distribution of index
- Page 169 and 170:
157 the study area, respectively. R
- Page 171 and 172:
159 Liquid limit variation; 0,50m a
- Page 173 and 174:
161 Liquid limit (LL) variation (>
- Page 175 and 176:
163 (8.6). The few isolated patches
- Page 177 and 178:
165 Similarly, soil thicknesses of
- Page 179 and 180:
167 Free swell variation; 0,50m dep
- Page 181 and 182:
169 fraction at the two depth inter
- Page 183 and 184:
171 Variation of fines (%), < 0,50m
- Page 185 and 186:
173 %coarse % coarse fraction varia
- Page 187 and 188:
175 1°19´S 22 Shear angle variati
- Page 189 and 190:
177 9.2 Grain size distribution The
- Page 191 and 192:
179 rapid dissipation of pore water
- Page 193 and 194:
Chapter 10 181 Correlation of index
- Page 195 and 196:
183 Black clays; plasticity index/
- Page 197 and 198:
185 On the other hand, laboratory m
- Page 199 and 200:
187 Red clays; measured/ calculated
- Page 201 and 202:
189 These two relationships could b
- Page 203 and 204:
191 Diagram: PImeasured/ PIcalculat
- Page 205 and 206:
193 Table 10.5, continued. Calculat
- Page 207 and 208:
195 Table 10.6. Calculated and labo
- Page 209 and 210:
197 The swelling capability in term
- Page 211 and 212:
199 Free swell/ clay fraction Free
- Page 213 and 214:
201 There has also been a decrease
- Page 215 and 216:
203 PI = 1,88*LS A comparison of pl
- Page 217 and 218:
205 cc = 0,0099(122-LL) for black c
- Page 219 and 220:
207 Chapter 12 Recommendations Anal
- Page 221 and 222:
209 cc = 0,0099(122-LL) for black c
- Page 223 and 224:
211 References Abebe, S. T., 2002.
- Page 225 and 226:
213 Galster, R.W., 1977. A system o
- Page 227 and 228:
215 Mitchell, J.K., 1993. Fundament
- Page 229 and 230:
217 ------,1964. Long term stabilit
- Page 231 and 232:
Appendix A: Oedometer consolidation
- Page 233 and 234:
Table A7. Consolidation parameters
- Page 235 and 236:
Results of swelling tests on black
- Page 237 and 238:
Appendix D Distribution/ variation
- Page 239 and 240:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
- Page 241 and 242:
4000 3000 2000 1000 Distance (m) We
- Page 243 and 244:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
- Page 245 and 246:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
- Page 247 and 248:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
- Page 249 and 250:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
- Page 251 and 252:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
- Page 253 and 254:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
- Page 255 and 256:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
- Page 257 and 258:
4000 3000 2000 Distance (m) 1000 We
- Page 259 and 260:
Appendix E Geotechnical soil map of