31.12.2013 Views

Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University

Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University

Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PDE – Steven D. Coll<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Methods<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

3.2. Cod<strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of the videotapes and<br />

database<br />

A previous study on <strong>Tactile</strong> Sign Language by Karen Petronio, Val Dively and their<br />

assistants used a software program called Filemaker Pro and transcription software developed <strong>in</strong><br />

Germany for use <strong>in</strong> cod<strong>in</strong>g sign language data. This researcher decided not to follow this<br />

method. For the analysis of the 50-m<strong>in</strong>ute conversation between two deaf-bl<strong>in</strong>d men, a database<br />

was developed us<strong>in</strong>g a transcription format which <strong>in</strong>dicates specific symbols for each utterance.<br />

The entire conversation was analyzed and each occurrence of an adverb <strong>in</strong> the conversation was<br />

entered <strong>in</strong>to an Excel spreadsheet accord<strong>in</strong>g to six categories as discussed <strong>in</strong> more detail <strong>in</strong> the<br />

next section. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the transcriptions the code “C” and “D” were used for the two subjects.<br />

From the pilot study, various past studies on the structure of <strong>ASL</strong>, and from recent<br />

studies on <strong>ASL</strong> variation there are a variety of features that have been identified as target<br />

features/variables for study. This paper focuses exclusively on adverbs. Information on these<br />

features was entered <strong>in</strong>to the database along with <strong>in</strong>formation on the l<strong>in</strong>guistic environment <strong>in</strong><br />

which they appear, their grammatical category, their phonological form, and other <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

that was determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be relevant, or potentially relevant. This is <strong>in</strong> addition to consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />

usual social constra<strong>in</strong>ts such as age, gender, educational background, audiological status of<br />

parents and sibl<strong>in</strong>gs, and the age at which <strong>ASL</strong> was acquired. The follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation was<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the Deaf-Bl<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>formants:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

The age at which they used <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong> for the first time<br />

The age at which they started us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong> as their primary receptive means of<br />

communication.<br />

The age at which they first became aware of the process of <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong>.<br />

Their degree of <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> the Deaf-Bl<strong>in</strong>d community.<br />

How often do they <strong>in</strong>teract with other <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong> users?<br />

This <strong>in</strong>formation was <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the database for later study and research concern<strong>in</strong>g variability.<br />

The purpose for analyz<strong>in</strong>g the data was to account for and describe variation that occurs<br />

between <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong> and standard <strong>ASL</strong>. The analysis <strong>in</strong>volved a quantitative and qualitative<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!