Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University
Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University
Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PDE – Steven D. Coll<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Methods<br />
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
3.2. Cod<strong>in</strong>g and ma<strong>in</strong>tenance of the videotapes and<br />
database<br />
A previous study on <strong>Tactile</strong> Sign Language by Karen Petronio, Val Dively and their<br />
assistants used a software program called Filemaker Pro and transcription software developed <strong>in</strong><br />
Germany for use <strong>in</strong> cod<strong>in</strong>g sign language data. This researcher decided not to follow this<br />
method. For the analysis of the 50-m<strong>in</strong>ute conversation between two deaf-bl<strong>in</strong>d men, a database<br />
was developed us<strong>in</strong>g a transcription format which <strong>in</strong>dicates specific symbols for each utterance.<br />
The entire conversation was analyzed and each occurrence of an adverb <strong>in</strong> the conversation was<br />
entered <strong>in</strong>to an Excel spreadsheet accord<strong>in</strong>g to six categories as discussed <strong>in</strong> more detail <strong>in</strong> the<br />
next section. Dur<strong>in</strong>g the transcriptions the code “C” and “D” were used for the two subjects.<br />
From the pilot study, various past studies on the structure of <strong>ASL</strong>, and from recent<br />
studies on <strong>ASL</strong> variation there are a variety of features that have been identified as target<br />
features/variables for study. This paper focuses exclusively on adverbs. Information on these<br />
features was entered <strong>in</strong>to the database along with <strong>in</strong>formation on the l<strong>in</strong>guistic environment <strong>in</strong><br />
which they appear, their grammatical category, their phonological form, and other <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
that was determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be relevant, or potentially relevant. This is <strong>in</strong> addition to consider<strong>in</strong>g<br />
usual social constra<strong>in</strong>ts such as age, gender, educational background, audiological status of<br />
parents and sibl<strong>in</strong>gs, and the age at which <strong>ASL</strong> was acquired. The follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation was<br />
obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the Deaf-Bl<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>formants:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The age at which they used <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong> for the first time<br />
The age at which they started us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong> as their primary receptive means of<br />
communication.<br />
The age at which they first became aware of the process of <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong>.<br />
Their degree of <strong>in</strong>volvement <strong>in</strong> the Deaf-Bl<strong>in</strong>d community.<br />
How often do they <strong>in</strong>teract with other <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong> users?<br />
This <strong>in</strong>formation was <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the database for later study and research concern<strong>in</strong>g variability.<br />
The purpose for analyz<strong>in</strong>g the data was to account for and describe variation that occurs<br />
between <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong> and standard <strong>ASL</strong>. The analysis <strong>in</strong>volved a quantitative and qualitative<br />
42