Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University
Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University
Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PDE – Steven D. Coll<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Intellectual Context and Literature Review<br />
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
Early on, the first l<strong>in</strong>guistic researcher of American Sign Language, William Stokoe<br />
(1960), claimed non-manual signals were used as grammatical markers. Stokoe recognized that<br />
the negative side-to-side head shak<strong>in</strong>g without a manual sign, clearly conveyed <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />
<strong>in</strong>formation. Liddell (1989) <strong>in</strong> the late 70s and early 80s demonstrated <strong>in</strong> his research that facial<br />
expressions and other non-manual signals provide emotive, lexical and grammatical <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />
As well, other non-manual grammatical signals take the form of changes <strong>in</strong> eyebrow movements.<br />
Additionally, Bridges and Metzger’s work (1996), while not exhaustive, provides a fairly<br />
comprehensive look at the large gamut of non-manual signals, their functions and their<br />
mean<strong>in</strong>gs. The authors categorized NMS’s <strong>in</strong>to six roles: “reflections of emotional states,<br />
constructed action, conversation regulators, lexical, grammatical markers and modifiers such as<br />
adverbs”. Based on this discussion, the question can be asked: How do non-manual signals,<br />
which are provided visually, become <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to the language of those produc<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
process<strong>in</strong>g tactile <strong>ASL</strong>?<br />
2.4.4. <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong><br />
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Coll<strong>in</strong>s and Petronio (1998), <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong> is the process where<strong>in</strong> a Deaf-<br />
Bl<strong>in</strong>d person places his/her hand on top of another signer’s hand and receives the <strong>ASL</strong> message<br />
through the sense of touch. There is a limited amount of research that describes the differences<br />
or similarities between the structure of forms of signs used <strong>in</strong> visual and tactile <strong>ASL</strong>. Space does<br />
not permit a detailed discussion of the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to phonology, syntax and discourse,<br />
but a full account can be found <strong>in</strong> Coll<strong>in</strong>s & Petronio (1998). In that work, signs were exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
<strong>in</strong> terms of their handshape, location, movement, and orientation.<br />
One major f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of this 1998 work was the phonological assimilation that occurred due<br />
to the necessity of the signers’ proximity. Certa<strong>in</strong> sign production parameters were changed due<br />
to the need for body contact or to the physical limitations of space. A second f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g, related to<br />
<strong>ASL</strong> syntax, was also discussed. As previously mentioned, attention has been given to the<br />
sentence types produced <strong>in</strong> visual <strong>ASL</strong> and how they are translated <strong>in</strong>to tactile <strong>ASL</strong>. Coll<strong>in</strong>s and<br />
Petronio describe the tactile substitutions necessary for the non-manual markers to be<br />
communicated clearly to the Deaf-Bl<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividual.<br />
34