31.12.2013 Views

Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University

Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University

Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

PDE – Steven D. Coll<strong>in</strong>s<br />

Intellectual Context and Literature Review<br />

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />

Early on, the first l<strong>in</strong>guistic researcher of American Sign Language, William Stokoe<br />

(1960), claimed non-manual signals were used as grammatical markers. Stokoe recognized that<br />

the negative side-to-side head shak<strong>in</strong>g without a manual sign, clearly conveyed <strong>in</strong>dependent<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation. Liddell (1989) <strong>in</strong> the late 70s and early 80s demonstrated <strong>in</strong> his research that facial<br />

expressions and other non-manual signals provide emotive, lexical and grammatical <strong>in</strong>formation.<br />

As well, other non-manual grammatical signals take the form of changes <strong>in</strong> eyebrow movements.<br />

Additionally, Bridges and Metzger’s work (1996), while not exhaustive, provides a fairly<br />

comprehensive look at the large gamut of non-manual signals, their functions and their<br />

mean<strong>in</strong>gs. The authors categorized NMS’s <strong>in</strong>to six roles: “reflections of emotional states,<br />

constructed action, conversation regulators, lexical, grammatical markers and modifiers such as<br />

adverbs”. Based on this discussion, the question can be asked: How do non-manual signals,<br />

which are provided visually, become <strong>in</strong>corporated <strong>in</strong>to the language of those produc<strong>in</strong>g and<br />

process<strong>in</strong>g tactile <strong>ASL</strong>?<br />

2.4.4. <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong><br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Coll<strong>in</strong>s and Petronio (1998), <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong> is the process where<strong>in</strong> a Deaf-<br />

Bl<strong>in</strong>d person places his/her hand on top of another signer’s hand and receives the <strong>ASL</strong> message<br />

through the sense of touch. There is a limited amount of research that describes the differences<br />

or similarities between the structure of forms of signs used <strong>in</strong> visual and tactile <strong>ASL</strong>. Space does<br />

not permit a detailed discussion of the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to phonology, syntax and discourse,<br />

but a full account can be found <strong>in</strong> Coll<strong>in</strong>s & Petronio (1998). In that work, signs were exam<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

<strong>in</strong> terms of their handshape, location, movement, and orientation.<br />

One major f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of this 1998 work was the phonological assimilation that occurred due<br />

to the necessity of the signers’ proximity. Certa<strong>in</strong> sign production parameters were changed due<br />

to the need for body contact or to the physical limitations of space. A second f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g, related to<br />

<strong>ASL</strong> syntax, was also discussed. As previously mentioned, attention has been given to the<br />

sentence types produced <strong>in</strong> visual <strong>ASL</strong> and how they are translated <strong>in</strong>to tactile <strong>ASL</strong>. Coll<strong>in</strong>s and<br />

Petronio describe the tactile substitutions necessary for the non-manual markers to be<br />

communicated clearly to the Deaf-Bl<strong>in</strong>d <strong>in</strong>dividual.<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!