Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University
Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University
Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
PDE – Steven D. Coll<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Intellectual Context and Literature Review<br />
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
O’Brien and Steffen’s data also conta<strong>in</strong>ed a one-handed variant of the sign BEAR, a sign<br />
which is normally two handed. The dropp<strong>in</strong>g of the second hand <strong>in</strong> this variant, is attributed to<br />
‘weak hand drop’, a phonological process that commonly occurs <strong>in</strong> standard <strong>ASL</strong> (Padden and<br />
Perlmutter 1987). The authors report that <strong>in</strong>stances of phonological variation occurred,<br />
particularly with<strong>in</strong> the location parameter type that is found <strong>in</strong> standard <strong>ASL</strong>. Weak-hand drop is<br />
therefore not unique to <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong>.<br />
Prior to this PDE’s research on adverbial morphemes <strong>in</strong> T<strong>ASL</strong> another paper <strong>in</strong>fluenced<br />
this PDE. This was research done by the Learner <strong>in</strong> conjunction with Dr. Karen Petronio (1998).<br />
The goal of that study was to compare <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong> to standard <strong>ASL</strong> and beg<strong>in</strong> to write a<br />
description of <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong>. The primary data used <strong>in</strong> that 1998 study came from unobtrusive<br />
videotap<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong> conversations that took place between 11 Deaf-Bl<strong>in</strong>d adults dur<strong>in</strong>g a<br />
four-hour <strong>in</strong>formal party. The 11 Deaf-Bl<strong>in</strong>d people, who knew the researchers, were asked and<br />
gave permission to videotape the party for l<strong>in</strong>guistic purposes. The videotap<strong>in</strong>g was done with a<br />
small hand-held camcorder with a zoom lens. While this data appears to be very natural and<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes a number of people, one disadvantage is there were no long sign<strong>in</strong>g segments from any<br />
one person. Secondary data came from the videotaped retell<strong>in</strong>g of stories by the three Deaf-<br />
Bl<strong>in</strong>d adults used <strong>in</strong> Petronio (1986). All 14 of the Deaf-Bl<strong>in</strong>d people <strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> this study had<br />
Usher Syndrome Type I and used <strong>ASL</strong> before they became legally bl<strong>in</strong>d. As well, the<br />
participants regularly socialized with other Deaf-Bl<strong>in</strong>d adults and were comfortable and<br />
experienced <strong>in</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong>.<br />
Coll<strong>in</strong>s and Petronio hypothesized that variation could occur at any level of language.<br />
The researchers utilized the follow<strong>in</strong>g questions to formulate and exam<strong>in</strong>e their hypothesis:<br />
<br />
<br />
Phonology: In <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong>, the receiver’s hand is placed on the signer’s hand. Does<br />
this physical difference result <strong>in</strong> changes <strong>in</strong> any of the sign parameters: handshape,<br />
movement, location, and orientation?<br />
Morphology: Deaf-Bl<strong>in</strong>d persons are unable to see the non-manual adverbs and<br />
adjectives that accompany many predicates. How are these non-manual morphemes<br />
conveyed <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tactile</strong> <strong>ASL</strong>?<br />
27