Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University
Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University
Adverbial Morphemes in Tactile ASL - Gallaudet University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
PDE – Steven D. Coll<strong>in</strong>s<br />
Intellectual Context and Literature Review<br />
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________<br />
2. Intellectual Context and Literature Review<br />
2.1. Background and Recent Research<br />
William Stokoe is known <strong>in</strong> Deaf culture as the “Father of American Sign Language<br />
(<strong>ASL</strong>)”. In his studies of American Sign Language (Stokoe 1960), Stokoe applied the idea of<br />
m<strong>in</strong>imal pairs to reveal the dist<strong>in</strong>ctive parts of a sign. In do<strong>in</strong>g so, he discovered the existence of<br />
three parameters: handshape, movement and location. Eventually, additional research<br />
demonstrated that orientation and a non-manual component were also dist<strong>in</strong>ctive, and these two<br />
parameters were then added. Although the physical form of a sign differs from the physical form<br />
of a spoken word—many of the same phonological processes and pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, such as<br />
assimilation, epenthesis, and metathesis, are found <strong>in</strong> both spoken and signed languages (Padden<br />
and Perlmutter 1987; Liddell and Johnson 1989).<br />
Currently, there are several compet<strong>in</strong>g theoretical models of <strong>ASL</strong> phonology, each try<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to best represent the hierarchical structure, the relationship between the parameters, and the<br />
features with<strong>in</strong> each parameter (Coulter 1992). Liddell and Johnson’s (1989) model proposes<br />
that a sign consists of a sequence of hold and movement segments, somewhat analogous to<br />
consonants and vowels, and each segment conta<strong>in</strong>s specifications for the four parameters.<br />
Movements are segmented <strong>in</strong> Liddell and Johnson’s model.<br />
Dr. Ceil Lucas (1995) has also done studies focused on the sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics of Deaf<br />
communities, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g issues of sociol<strong>in</strong>guistic variation with<strong>in</strong> signed languages, issues of<br />
bil<strong>in</strong>gualism and language contact, language policy and plann<strong>in</strong>g, and language attitudes. She<br />
has also researched the structure of sign language discourse and is the editor of a journal series<br />
entitled Sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics <strong>in</strong> Deaf Communities, which produces a yearly volume consist<strong>in</strong>g of<br />
papers <strong>in</strong> all areas of sociol<strong>in</strong>guistics perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to Deaf communities from around the world. As<br />
Lucas (1995) notes, Liddell & Johnson’s model is particularly suited for describ<strong>in</strong>g phonological<br />
processes often found <strong>in</strong> variation studies.<br />
10