31.12.2013 Views

Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland

Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland

Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

GOD’ S WAY t 177<br />

both rabbis <strong>and</strong> ulama were at the same time the conservative<br />

guardians <strong>and</strong> the cautiously innovative exegetes of a long <strong>and</strong><br />

complex legal tradition.<br />

But there were important differences. <strong>Jews</strong> were granted a degree<br />

of community autonomy, first in the Roman <strong>and</strong> Sasanian<br />

Empires <strong>and</strong> then in the dhimmi <strong>and</strong> later the millet systems under<br />

which they lived <strong>for</strong> long centuries in the Abode of <strong>Islam</strong> (see chapter<br />

8). That freedom was a concession dictated from above, <strong>and</strong><br />

within it the rabbis served, by delegation <strong>and</strong> with the acceptance<br />

of their coreligionists, as the administrators of that restricted<br />

autonomy. They not only maintained a legal tradition; they also<br />

administered it, as judges <strong>and</strong> surrogates of a higher judicial authority,<br />

that of the patriarchs who ruled the <strong>Jews</strong> of the Roman<br />

Empire, the exilarchs who governed the Babylonian communities,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the geonim, or heads of the great yeshivas.<br />

The Muslim ulama, in contrast, at least the Sunni variety, were<br />

only one element among the classes <strong>and</strong> elites contesting <strong>for</strong> power<br />

in the Abode of <strong>Islam</strong>. Be<strong>for</strong>e Ottoman times they neither possessed<br />

nor delegated any political authority, <strong>and</strong> they eschewed the<br />

administration of the sharia, a task that fell to the governmentappointed<br />

<strong>and</strong> supported qadi. Their power lay elsewhere, in the<br />

prestige they enjoyed as the custodians of the obviously <strong>Islam</strong>ic<br />

component in what was professedly an <strong>Islam</strong>ic society; in their<br />

independence of the state, which they could castigate or applaud<br />

as circumstances dictated; <strong>and</strong> in the network of marriages by<br />

which they could <strong>for</strong>ge ties with other powerful classes like the<br />

large l<strong>and</strong>owners <strong>and</strong> the wholesale merchants. Unlike their episcopal<br />

counterparts, the ulama did not hold the keys of the kingdom<br />

in their h<strong>and</strong>s; they could neither bind nor loose nor <strong>for</strong>ce a<br />

caliph to his knees or out of the Church. But power they possessed,<br />

a genuine political power. Like their Jesuit contemporaries in Europe,<br />

they educated an <strong>Islam</strong>ic intelligentsia in their school system.<br />

After the eleventh century higher education across the face of <strong>Islam</strong><br />

was uniquely ulama-inspired <strong>and</strong> directed in madrasas, where<br />

<strong>Islam</strong>ic consciences <strong>and</strong> indeed <strong>Islam</strong> itself were shaped through<br />

the instrument of the sharia.<br />

Until relatively recent times, the law school or yeshiva was the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!