Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland
Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland
Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
GOD’ S WAY t 177<br />
both rabbis <strong>and</strong> ulama were at the same time the conservative<br />
guardians <strong>and</strong> the cautiously innovative exegetes of a long <strong>and</strong><br />
complex legal tradition.<br />
But there were important differences. <strong>Jews</strong> were granted a degree<br />
of community autonomy, first in the Roman <strong>and</strong> Sasanian<br />
Empires <strong>and</strong> then in the dhimmi <strong>and</strong> later the millet systems under<br />
which they lived <strong>for</strong> long centuries in the Abode of <strong>Islam</strong> (see chapter<br />
8). That freedom was a concession dictated from above, <strong>and</strong><br />
within it the rabbis served, by delegation <strong>and</strong> with the acceptance<br />
of their coreligionists, as the administrators of that restricted<br />
autonomy. They not only maintained a legal tradition; they also<br />
administered it, as judges <strong>and</strong> surrogates of a higher judicial authority,<br />
that of the patriarchs who ruled the <strong>Jews</strong> of the Roman<br />
Empire, the exilarchs who governed the Babylonian communities,<br />
<strong>and</strong> the geonim, or heads of the great yeshivas.<br />
The Muslim ulama, in contrast, at least the Sunni variety, were<br />
only one element among the classes <strong>and</strong> elites contesting <strong>for</strong> power<br />
in the Abode of <strong>Islam</strong>. Be<strong>for</strong>e Ottoman times they neither possessed<br />
nor delegated any political authority, <strong>and</strong> they eschewed the<br />
administration of the sharia, a task that fell to the governmentappointed<br />
<strong>and</strong> supported qadi. Their power lay elsewhere, in the<br />
prestige they enjoyed as the custodians of the obviously <strong>Islam</strong>ic<br />
component in what was professedly an <strong>Islam</strong>ic society; in their<br />
independence of the state, which they could castigate or applaud<br />
as circumstances dictated; <strong>and</strong> in the network of marriages by<br />
which they could <strong>for</strong>ge ties with other powerful classes like the<br />
large l<strong>and</strong>owners <strong>and</strong> the wholesale merchants. Unlike their episcopal<br />
counterparts, the ulama did not hold the keys of the kingdom<br />
in their h<strong>and</strong>s; they could neither bind nor loose nor <strong>for</strong>ce a<br />
caliph to his knees or out of the Church. But power they possessed,<br />
a genuine political power. Like their Jesuit contemporaries in Europe,<br />
they educated an <strong>Islam</strong>ic intelligentsia in their school system.<br />
After the eleventh century higher education across the face of <strong>Islam</strong><br />
was uniquely ulama-inspired <strong>and</strong> directed in madrasas, where<br />
<strong>Islam</strong>ic consciences <strong>and</strong> indeed <strong>Islam</strong> itself were shaped through<br />
the instrument of the sharia.<br />
Until relatively recent times, the law school or yeshiva was the