31.12.2013 Views

Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland

Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland

Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

160 t CHAPTER SEVEN<br />

wine is prohibited (Quran 2:219)—though it is served in Paradise<br />

(47:15)—<strong>and</strong> this is new; likewise <strong>for</strong>bidden are certain foods,<br />

most notably pork (5:3), <strong>and</strong> this is not. Judaism had gone there<br />

be<strong>for</strong>e, though the Muslim food menu is far less restrictive than<br />

the Jewish one. In addition, the Muslim had the example of the<br />

Prophet, which was, as already noted, not entirely unambiguous<br />

when it came to the licit things of the world.<br />

The Tradition<br />

Muhammad’s example <strong>and</strong>, equally important, his instruction,<br />

was carried <strong>for</strong>ward to succeeding generations of Muslims in a<br />

great body of anecdotes that professed to record his sayings <strong>and</strong><br />

deeds. These Prophetic reports flowed steadily <strong>and</strong> powerfully into<br />

the still nascent <strong>Islam</strong>ic tradition <strong>and</strong>, together with the Quran,<br />

gave it shape <strong>and</strong> definition. Out of this mix of Scripture <strong>and</strong> report,<br />

<strong>and</strong> the Muslims’ interpretation of both, emerged the sharia,<br />

<strong>Islam</strong>ic religious law.<br />

There is more than one problematic element in the combination<br />

of Scripture, reports about the Prophet, <strong>and</strong> what the Muslims call<br />

ijtihad, or “personal ef<strong>for</strong>t.” Something has already been said<br />

about the Muslims’ probing the meaning of Scripture; here it is a<br />

matter of its complement, tradition. All three communities of<br />

Scripturalists recognize a continued or continuing <strong>for</strong>m of revelation,<br />

whether in the <strong>for</strong>m of texts or voices, to guide the community<br />

along the “right way ” to its ordained goal. God’s voice is not<br />

stilled, as it turns out, but merely turns into other channels. Generically,<br />

this other channel of divine guidance was understood as<br />

something h<strong>and</strong>ed down from an older <strong>and</strong> indubitable source,<br />

<strong>and</strong> so it is fair to describe it as “tradition.” In English that word is<br />

used in the singular to describe a whole range of concepts, from a<br />

cast-in-stone practice, to authoritative counsels or exemplary<br />

guidelines, to mere customary action, with a semantic inclination<br />

toward the latter end of the scale. “Tradition” is being used here,<br />

however, in a rather precise, <strong>and</strong> perhaps unfamiliar, way. For all<br />

three Peoples of the Book, “tradition” is understood as a nonscrip-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!