31.12.2013 Views

Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland

Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland

Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

THE MUSLIM SCRIPTURE t 105<br />

Who Wrote Scripture?<br />

The Bible is not merely God’s direct speech—indeed, examples of<br />

such direct discourse <strong>for</strong>m only a small percentage of the whole—<br />

but is a composed narrative framework within which actions as<br />

well as speech unfold, <strong>and</strong> most often it is the speech of mortals.<br />

The <strong>Jews</strong> understood that the biblical books had authors—Moses,<br />

<strong>for</strong> example, <strong>and</strong> David, <strong>and</strong> Ezra—<strong>and</strong> to that extent they were<br />

linguistically conditioned, though nonetheless inspired. The Quran,<br />

in contrast, seems to present itself as the ipsissima verba of God,<br />

<strong>and</strong> in “manifest” or “convincing” Arabic (Quran 16:103, etc.).<br />

It has no framing narrative, however, no authorial signature or<br />

presence. In the Muslim view, Muhammad is not even a transmitter;<br />

he merely announced with absolute accuracy what he himself<br />

had heard. The consequence, then, is that the Quran contains<br />

the precise words of God, without human intervention or conditioning<br />

of any sort; that God had spoken, <strong>and</strong> Muhammad had<br />

heard <strong>and</strong> reported, Arabic speech. Finally, both <strong>Jews</strong> <strong>and</strong> Muslims<br />

use the text of Scripture as the essential base <strong>for</strong> their liturgical<br />

prayers. Though the Mishnah explicitly allows the use of the<br />

vernacular (“any language”) <strong>for</strong> the central liturgical prayers, the<br />

pull of the original tongue is strong among <strong>Jews</strong>, whereas among<br />

Muslims the practice of using Arabic in liturgical prayer is practically<br />

universal.<br />

<strong>Islam</strong> did not have, then, or did not recognize, an author or a<br />

multiple-author problem. God had spoken in this instance to one<br />

sole messenger, Muhammad, <strong>and</strong> the Quran is, in effect, his Torah;<br />

it is, in its entirety, God’s Word, without the addition of either the<br />

Books of Kings or Job. Muslims, moreover, will distinguish rather<br />

sharply the “inspired” Muhammad, whose word was Torah, from<br />

the man of Mecca <strong>and</strong> Medina who offered explanation, advice,<br />

<strong>and</strong> wise counsel. These latter were not in the Quran but were<br />

collected in a kind of deutero-canonical <strong>for</strong>m in the “Prophetic<br />

reports,” or hadith (see chapter 7). Some non-Muslims have argued<br />

that the hadith are a kind of Muslim apocrypha, the sayings<br />

pool out of which the Quran was selected <strong>and</strong> anointed as revela-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!