Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland
Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland
Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
104 t CHAPTER FIVE<br />
among them who twist Scripture with their tongues so that you<br />
suppose that it is Scripture <strong>and</strong> it is not; <strong>and</strong> they say, ‘This is from<br />
God,’ <strong>and</strong> it is not from God. They lie against God <strong>and</strong> they know<br />
it.”<br />
These are the grounds <strong>for</strong> what soon developed into the Muslim<br />
doctrine of tahrif, or “falsification,” the charge that the <strong>Jews</strong> (<strong>and</strong><br />
latterly, the <strong>Christians</strong>) altered their Scriptures. The Quran’s instance<br />
of that charge may have had to do with the Medina <strong>Jews</strong>’<br />
failure to acknowledge Muhammad’s prophethood, or even, as the<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ard Life of Muhammad later suggested, of differing interpretations<br />
of a biblical passage. The way the story unfolds in the<br />
Life, it was a question of an actual text (Deut. 22:24) that an unnamed<br />
Medina rabbi attempted to conceal by placing a h<strong>and</strong> over<br />
it in order to belie Muhammad’s judgment that the punishment <strong>for</strong><br />
adultery was stoning (suggested, without detail, in Quran 5:42–<br />
49). The case may indeed have been, as Quran 5:42 suggests, that<br />
some <strong>Jews</strong> called on Muhammad, now the Gr<strong>and</strong> Arbiter of Medina,<br />
to judge a case of adultery between two <strong>Jews</strong> of the oasis <strong>and</strong><br />
that the Prophet attempted to render a judgment on what he understood<br />
to be scriptural grounds. What is highly improbable,<br />
however, is that there followed an argument about a text, which<br />
the local rabbis possessed <strong>and</strong> whose reading they attempted to<br />
conceal <strong>and</strong> which Muhammad then demonstrated ex litteris was<br />
the correct one.<br />
Muslims recognize that both the Torah <strong>and</strong> the Gospel originally<br />
represented true <strong>and</strong> authentic revelations from genuine <strong>and</strong><br />
esteemed prophets, Moses (Musa) <strong>and</strong> Jesus (Isa), but subsequently<br />
<strong>Jews</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Christians</strong> tampered with the texts—they removed<br />
predictions of Muhammad, <strong>for</strong> one—<strong>and</strong> so their present<br />
versions are generally unreliable. They are not, in any event, either<br />
required or even recommended reading <strong>for</strong> Muslims. <strong>Christians</strong><br />
argued with <strong>Jews</strong> throughout the Middle Ages on what the Bible,<br />
which they both accepted, meant. Muslims devoted their polemic<br />
energies rather to demonstrating that that same Bible, <strong>and</strong> the<br />
Gospels as well, had been tampered with to the extent that they<br />
were unusable.