31.12.2013 Views

Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland

Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland

Islam: A Guide for Jews and Christians - Electric Scotland

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

104 t CHAPTER FIVE<br />

among them who twist Scripture with their tongues so that you<br />

suppose that it is Scripture <strong>and</strong> it is not; <strong>and</strong> they say, ‘This is from<br />

God,’ <strong>and</strong> it is not from God. They lie against God <strong>and</strong> they know<br />

it.”<br />

These are the grounds <strong>for</strong> what soon developed into the Muslim<br />

doctrine of tahrif, or “falsification,” the charge that the <strong>Jews</strong> (<strong>and</strong><br />

latterly, the <strong>Christians</strong>) altered their Scriptures. The Quran’s instance<br />

of that charge may have had to do with the Medina <strong>Jews</strong>’<br />

failure to acknowledge Muhammad’s prophethood, or even, as the<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ard Life of Muhammad later suggested, of differing interpretations<br />

of a biblical passage. The way the story unfolds in the<br />

Life, it was a question of an actual text (Deut. 22:24) that an unnamed<br />

Medina rabbi attempted to conceal by placing a h<strong>and</strong> over<br />

it in order to belie Muhammad’s judgment that the punishment <strong>for</strong><br />

adultery was stoning (suggested, without detail, in Quran 5:42–<br />

49). The case may indeed have been, as Quran 5:42 suggests, that<br />

some <strong>Jews</strong> called on Muhammad, now the Gr<strong>and</strong> Arbiter of Medina,<br />

to judge a case of adultery between two <strong>Jews</strong> of the oasis <strong>and</strong><br />

that the Prophet attempted to render a judgment on what he understood<br />

to be scriptural grounds. What is highly improbable,<br />

however, is that there followed an argument about a text, which<br />

the local rabbis possessed <strong>and</strong> whose reading they attempted to<br />

conceal <strong>and</strong> which Muhammad then demonstrated ex litteris was<br />

the correct one.<br />

Muslims recognize that both the Torah <strong>and</strong> the Gospel originally<br />

represented true <strong>and</strong> authentic revelations from genuine <strong>and</strong><br />

esteemed prophets, Moses (Musa) <strong>and</strong> Jesus (Isa), but subsequently<br />

<strong>Jews</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Christians</strong> tampered with the texts—they removed<br />

predictions of Muhammad, <strong>for</strong> one—<strong>and</strong> so their present<br />

versions are generally unreliable. They are not, in any event, either<br />

required or even recommended reading <strong>for</strong> Muslims. <strong>Christians</strong><br />

argued with <strong>Jews</strong> throughout the Middle Ages on what the Bible,<br />

which they both accepted, meant. Muslims devoted their polemic<br />

energies rather to demonstrating that that same Bible, <strong>and</strong> the<br />

Gospels as well, had been tampered with to the extent that they<br />

were unusable.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!