31.12.2013 Views

The New Zealand Sealing Industry - Department of Conservation

The New Zealand Sealing Industry - Department of Conservation

The New Zealand Sealing Industry - Department of Conservation

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

3.4 SEALING CARGOES<br />

At least some information on cargoes is available for 87% <strong>of</strong> the voyages<br />

considered here, although this is not always in quantified form (Table 1). <strong>The</strong>re<br />

were two major products <strong>of</strong> the sealing industry—skins and oil. <strong>The</strong> former<br />

were predominantly from <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri),<br />

which occurred throughout the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> sealing region although small<br />

numbers <strong>of</strong> ‘hair seal’ skins, from the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> sea lion (Phocarctus<br />

hookeri), were also reported. Most oil was derived from Southern elephant<br />

seals (Mirounga leonina), which occurred in greatest number on Macquarie<br />

Island. Although it is hardly mentioned in the cargo returns, there is evidence<br />

that on occasion oil was also recovered from fur seals (see 5.1.2 below). Other<br />

cargoes listed on voyages associated with sealing include whale oil, flax, timber,<br />

and pork. Those for which no cargo is listed were usually engaged in setting<br />

down, provisioning, or uplifting sealing gangs, although occasionally they<br />

represent unsuccessful sealing missions.<br />

<strong>The</strong> figures in Table 1 demonstrate that skins were the major target <strong>of</strong> the<br />

industry. <strong>The</strong>y were listed for 61% <strong>of</strong> voyages for which data is available, while<br />

oil was listed for just 39%. It is also apparent that there is a much higher survival<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> information on the quantities <strong>of</strong> skins (c. 90%) than there is for oil (c.<br />

70%), even when both were returned on the same voyage. Thus some caution<br />

must be exercised when considering the relative productivity <strong>of</strong> the two main<br />

components <strong>of</strong> the industry.<br />

TABLE 1. NUMBER OF VOYAGES WITH DATA AVAILABLE ON THE TYPE AND<br />

QUANTITY OF CARGO.<br />

CARGO NO. VOYAGES QUANTIFIED %<br />

TYPE WITH TYPE LISTED DATA QUANTIFIED<br />

Skins 94 84 89<br />

Skins and oil 34 for skins: 32 94<br />

for oil: 27 79<br />

Skins, oil and other 5 for skins: 3 60<br />

for oil: 2 40<br />

Skins and other 42 39 93<br />

Oil 67 47 70<br />

Oil and other 5 2 40<br />

Other cargo 7 – –<br />

No cargo 35 – –<br />

No data 43 – –<br />

Total 332<br />

3.5 SUB-REGIONS<br />

For all but two <strong>of</strong> the voyages under consideration there is some evidence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

general area(s) in which they operated, although in some cases there is not a<br />

great deal <strong>of</strong> certainty (Table 2). At least 24% <strong>of</strong> the voyages visited two or more<br />

island groups, and at least one called at five or more.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!