The New Zealand Sealing Industry - Department of Conservation
The New Zealand Sealing Industry - Department of Conservation
The New Zealand Sealing Industry - Department of Conservation
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
3.4 SEALING CARGOES<br />
At least some information on cargoes is available for 87% <strong>of</strong> the voyages<br />
considered here, although this is not always in quantified form (Table 1). <strong>The</strong>re<br />
were two major products <strong>of</strong> the sealing industry—skins and oil. <strong>The</strong> former<br />
were predominantly from <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri),<br />
which occurred throughout the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> sealing region although small<br />
numbers <strong>of</strong> ‘hair seal’ skins, from the <strong>New</strong> <strong>Zealand</strong> sea lion (Phocarctus<br />
hookeri), were also reported. Most oil was derived from Southern elephant<br />
seals (Mirounga leonina), which occurred in greatest number on Macquarie<br />
Island. Although it is hardly mentioned in the cargo returns, there is evidence<br />
that on occasion oil was also recovered from fur seals (see 5.1.2 below). Other<br />
cargoes listed on voyages associated with sealing include whale oil, flax, timber,<br />
and pork. Those for which no cargo is listed were usually engaged in setting<br />
down, provisioning, or uplifting sealing gangs, although occasionally they<br />
represent unsuccessful sealing missions.<br />
<strong>The</strong> figures in Table 1 demonstrate that skins were the major target <strong>of</strong> the<br />
industry. <strong>The</strong>y were listed for 61% <strong>of</strong> voyages for which data is available, while<br />
oil was listed for just 39%. It is also apparent that there is a much higher survival<br />
rate <strong>of</strong> information on the quantities <strong>of</strong> skins (c. 90%) than there is for oil (c.<br />
70%), even when both were returned on the same voyage. Thus some caution<br />
must be exercised when considering the relative productivity <strong>of</strong> the two main<br />
components <strong>of</strong> the industry.<br />
TABLE 1. NUMBER OF VOYAGES WITH DATA AVAILABLE ON THE TYPE AND<br />
QUANTITY OF CARGO.<br />
CARGO NO. VOYAGES QUANTIFIED %<br />
TYPE WITH TYPE LISTED DATA QUANTIFIED<br />
Skins 94 84 89<br />
Skins and oil 34 for skins: 32 94<br />
for oil: 27 79<br />
Skins, oil and other 5 for skins: 3 60<br />
for oil: 2 40<br />
Skins and other 42 39 93<br />
Oil 67 47 70<br />
Oil and other 5 2 40<br />
Other cargo 7 – –<br />
No cargo 35 – –<br />
No data 43 – –<br />
Total 332<br />
3.5 SUB-REGIONS<br />
For all but two <strong>of</strong> the voyages under consideration there is some evidence <strong>of</strong> the<br />
general area(s) in which they operated, although in some cases there is not a<br />
great deal <strong>of</strong> certainty (Table 2). At least 24% <strong>of</strong> the voyages visited two or more<br />
island groups, and at least one called at five or more.<br />
8