30.12.2013 Views

Public Act 490 Guide - CT.gov

Public Act 490 Guide - CT.gov

Public Act 490 Guide - CT.gov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PA<br />

<strong>490</strong><br />

SE<strong>CT</strong>ION 11: TERMINATION OF CLASSIFICATION OF PA <strong>490</strong> LAND AND NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS<br />

fallow for a period of time. In all cases, the land use has not<br />

changed and should remain classified under PA <strong>490</strong> and<br />

the assessor should examine the overall intent and purpose<br />

of PA <strong>490</strong> as it pertains to land classification. It is important<br />

for the farmer to communicate with the assessor when<br />

there is a change to the farming operation and to have a<br />

plan for continuation of the farming operation in order to<br />

maintain the land in PA <strong>490</strong><br />

Change or Sale of Acreage: If a landowner sells off<br />

some acreage of land that has been classified under PA <strong>490</strong><br />

farmland, the acreage not sold remains under classification<br />

and should not be declassified, provided the use has not<br />

changed. In the case of PA <strong>490</strong> forest land or open space,<br />

the landowner's remaining land should not be declassified<br />

unless the remaining acreage falls below the minimum<br />

acreage required for those classifications. The change in<br />

acreage should be noted in the PA <strong>490</strong> file for that property<br />

and the existing application amended to reflect the<br />

change in acreage. A new map or sketch clearly showing<br />

classified and non-classified land or change of ownership<br />

should be filed as well. A new Qualified Foresters Report<br />

may not be required unless the classification is over ten<br />

years old. In addition, the conveyance tax clock remains<br />

the same and does not start anew.<br />

Subdivision of PA <strong>490</strong> Land: There have been a<br />

number of legal challenges involving use valuation as<br />

impacted by the owner obtaining subdivision approval or<br />

a special permit for development after property is classified<br />

under PA <strong>490</strong>. The earliest Supreme Court case to touch on<br />

the issue is Marshall v. Town of Newington (1968). A farmer<br />

had sought a zone change and had his farm zoned industrial;<br />

he had already sold several parcels for industrial use.<br />

Then he sought to have the remainder of the parcels he<br />

owned classified as farmland under PA <strong>490</strong>. The Supreme<br />

Court declared that it was irrelevant that the adjoining<br />

property was sold for high prices as industrial land. The<br />

important focus was whether the land sought to be classified<br />

was being used for farming purposes. There was an<br />

analysis of the amount of farming being conducted.<br />

In a 1994 Superior Court case, however, Maynard v.<br />

Town of Sterling, the owner had his 36-acre farm approved<br />

for 18 building lots. At the time of trial, eight lots had<br />

houses built on them, and the remaining land was still<br />

being farmed with a corn crop. The lower court determined<br />

the development of eight out of 18 lots and offering the<br />

balance for immediate development was a change to the<br />

actual use of the whole farm, and the declassification was<br />

found proper. The court reasoned that the farmer's active<br />

development no longer served the public policy underlying<br />

PA <strong>490</strong>.<br />

In 2002, a similar fact situation was presented involving<br />

PA <strong>490</strong> forest land in Carmel Hollow v. Town of Bethlehem.<br />

A subdivision approval had been obtained and lots sold.<br />

However, the Connecticut Supreme Court found that the<br />

forest land could not be declassified by the assessor even<br />

though a number of lots had been sold because only the<br />

State Forester had the power to declassify forest land. The<br />

Court did not reach the issue of the impact of selling lots<br />

in this case.<br />

The Supreme Court in Griswold Airport v. Madison (2008)<br />

found that the mere approval of a special permit for 127<br />

condominium units on an area of an airport classified as<br />

open space did not justify declassification. The court found<br />

that the airport use had not actually changed.<br />

This line of cases makes it clear that the change of land<br />

use approvals by themselves do not require a declassification.<br />

But once a property owner begins to use those<br />

approvals by converting parts of the property into other<br />

uses, and offering it for sale for those purposes, especially<br />

in the case of farmland, he takes a risk that he will be<br />

viewed more as a developer and the remaining land will be<br />

declassified. At least there should be enough of a viable<br />

farming operation still active and not being offered for<br />

development that it is legitimately worthy of continued<br />

classification standing alone. Where there are minimum<br />

acreage requirements for open space, and definitely for<br />

forest land, declassification is proper if the minimum<br />

acreage is not maintained in that use.<br />

NOTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR<br />

RECLASSIFICATION OF PA <strong>490</strong> LAND<br />

Reclassification occurs when PA <strong>490</strong> land changes from<br />

one classification to another, but stays within the same<br />

deeded ownership i.e. from PA <strong>490</strong> farmland to PA <strong>490</strong><br />

forest land. In many cases, the reason that the assessor is<br />

looking to have farmland reclassified is that the amount of<br />

forest land or woodland in the existing farm unit exceeds<br />

25 acres which is the minimum acreage needed for wood-<br />

26<br />

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Act</strong> <strong>490</strong>: A Practical <strong>Guide</strong> and Overview • http://www.cfba.org/pa<strong>490</strong>guide.htm • Connecticut Farm Bureau Association

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!