30.12.2013 Views

Public Act 490 Guide - CT.gov

Public Act 490 Guide - CT.gov

Public Act 490 Guide - CT.gov

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

RECOMMENDED PA <strong>490</strong> LAND VALUES<br />

PA<br />

<strong>490</strong><br />

SE<strong>CT</strong>ION 4: RECOMMENDED PA <strong>490</strong> LAND VALUES<br />

CGS Section 12-63 Rule of Valuation states that: The<br />

present true and actual value of land classified as farmland<br />

pursuant to Section 12-107c, as forest land pursuant to<br />

Section 12-107d, as open space pursuant to Section 12-107e<br />

or as maritime heritage land pursuant to Section 12-107g,<br />

shall be based upon its current use without regard to neighborhood<br />

land use of a more intensive nature.<br />

What this means is that classified land will not be<br />

assessed at the higher fair market value but at a lower<br />

land use value. This has been affirmed by the courts:<br />

Rustici v. Town of Stonington 1977 and Bussa v. Town of<br />

Glastonbury 1968.<br />

CGS Chapter 201 Section 12-2b provides that the<br />

Office of Policy and Management in consultation<br />

with the Commissioner of Agriculture shall develop a<br />

recommended schedule of land use values for PA <strong>490</strong><br />

valuation. These values are required to be updated<br />

every five years. These recommended values are<br />

made available to each municipality and to the<br />

general public.<br />

It is strongly urged that towns use these values.<br />

However, a municipality may choose not to use these<br />

recommended values. If this occurs, the values used<br />

by that town for each classified property must be<br />

supported by data and an approved methodology.<br />

Values other than those recommended by the<br />

Office of Policy and Management must be justified<br />

in the context of CGS Chapter 203 Section 12-63:<br />

Rule of valuation.<br />

METHODOLOGY USED TO OBTAIN<br />

RECOMMENDED PA <strong>490</strong> FARMLAND<br />

USE VALUES<br />

The development of the <strong>Public</strong> <strong>Act</strong> <strong>490</strong> 2010 Land Use<br />

Values, based on the capitalization of rent, was initiated in<br />

June of 2009 by the Connecticut Farm Bureau Association<br />

in cooperation with the Connecticut Department of<br />

Agriculture, and the PA <strong>490</strong> <strong>Guide</strong> Advisory Committee<br />

that redesigned the Net Rental Land Use Value Survey<br />

(See Appendix C). This tool proved quite successful as the<br />

information received was more reliable, and much easier<br />

to understand and interpret than in the past 2000 and<br />

1995 surveys. More than 1,500 surveys were distributed<br />

using mailing lists compiled by Connecticut Farm Bureau<br />

Association and the Connecticut Department of Agriculture.<br />

The survey also was distributed at various agricultural<br />

meetings and venues and through personal contact by<br />

Farm Credit East, the Connecticut Department of Agriculture,<br />

Connecticut Farm Bureau, Farm Service Agency, and<br />

the Natural Resources Conservation Service. The importance<br />

of returning the survey was emphasized, and 129<br />

individual farmers and property owners returned surveys<br />

representing 361 individual rent values (332 were used,<br />

equaling 89%). The 2009 survey provided more usable<br />

data compared to the 2000 survey, which included 742<br />

rents (635 were used, equaling 85%). The total number of<br />

submitters in 2000 was not counted.<br />

An overview of the data indicates a significant increase<br />

in the dollar per acre rents for Tillable A and Tillable B<br />

farmland, particularly river valley land. There are two<br />

reasons for this increase. One, the rent information has<br />

not been collected for ten years, and two, the continued<br />

decline in the amount of quality valley farmland available<br />

with fewer, but much larger and dominant farms. Farmers<br />

are competing for this land not only through rental agreements,<br />

but as evident in the marketplace. The demand is<br />

a combination of a very strong residual tobacco industry,<br />

coupled with a strong demand for valley land for fruits<br />

and vegetables.<br />

For the less productive Tillable C and D land, the competition<br />

is varied. There are a number of large dairy farms<br />

with over 500 cows. Only a small number of these farms<br />

submitted rental information, believed to indicate the<br />

significance of competition for rental lands. The other<br />

significant factor is the percentage increase in the amount<br />

of land that is being rented for no cash consideration.<br />

In 2000, the total percentage of rent values submitted as<br />

zero was 15% and in 2010 it was 37%. This also indicates<br />

there is more Tillable C, Tillable D and pasture land in the<br />

hands of non-farmers who want to keep their land open<br />

by allowing farmers to use their land for no fee. A few<br />

landowners were receiving non-cash consideration from<br />

4<br />

<strong>Public</strong> <strong>Act</strong> <strong>490</strong>: A Practical <strong>Guide</strong> and Overview • http://www.cfba.org/pa<strong>490</strong>guide.htm • Connecticut Farm Bureau Association

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!