st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
86 ST. JOHN OF DAMASCUS.<br />
if counted separately. The double ones are :<br />
(i) Judges<br />
and Ruth; (2) Fir<strong>st</strong> and Second Books <strong>of</strong> Kings (our<br />
I. Samuel and II. Samuel) ; (3) Third and Fourth<br />
Books <strong>of</strong> Kings (our I. Kings and II. Kings) (4)<br />
Fir<strong>st</strong> and Second Books <strong>of</strong> Chronicles ; (5)<br />
Fir<strong>st</strong> and<br />
Second Books <strong>of</strong> Esdras (our Ezra and Nehemiah).<br />
The Book <strong>of</strong> Judith is not named by him, while<br />
Ecclesia<strong>st</strong>icus and the Book <strong>of</strong> Wisdom are not made<br />
canonical. In the New Te<strong>st</strong>ament his li<strong>st</strong> agrees<br />
with our own, except that he adds to the number the<br />
Apo<strong>st</strong>olical Canons, drawn up, as he supposes, by<br />
Clement. Returning to a subject discussed before<br />
the tw<strong>of</strong>old nature <strong>of</strong> Chri<strong>st</strong> he enquires into the<br />
application <strong>of</strong> various texts <strong>of</strong> Scripture to that<br />
doctrine. The origin <strong>of</strong> evil is then treated <strong>of</strong>, but<br />
at no great length ;<br />
as also the Manichean theory <strong>of</strong><br />
two co-ordinate principles, one good, the other bad<br />
(cc. xcii., xciii.)<br />
In what he says <strong>of</strong> the Sabbath<br />
(c. xcvi.), there are some <strong>st</strong>riking remarks, coupled<br />
with much that is merely fanciful. God, knowing the<br />
coarse and fleshly nature <strong>of</strong> the people <strong>of</strong> Israel, 1<br />
ordained for them this outward observance, that their<br />
slaves and cattle might re<strong>st</strong> as well as they. Had<br />
they been able to realise the higher position <strong>of</strong> sons,<br />
and not servants, <strong>of</strong> God, the Israelites would not<br />
a fraction <strong>of</strong><br />
have been thus commanded to set apart<br />
their time for the special service <strong>of</strong> Him to whom<br />
they owed all. In this respect, as in others,<br />
was not made for a righteous man, but for the<br />
the law<br />
lawless<br />
1<br />
In taking this tone, Damascenus may<br />
remind us <strong>of</strong> Dean<br />
Colet s "Letters to Radulphus"<br />
on the same subject.