30.12.2013 Views

st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul

st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul

st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

84 ST. JOHN OF DAMASCUS.<br />

to surmount the difficulty<br />

by sugge<strong>st</strong>ing a new piece<br />

<strong>of</strong> subtilty, that like as a man s body takes in daily<br />

additional matter, and all becomes one and the same<br />

body, so our Lord s personal body takes in all the newmade<br />

bodies <strong>of</strong> the Euchari<strong>st</strong> ;<br />

and thus, by a kind<br />

<strong>of</strong> growth or augmentation,<br />

all become one and the<br />

same personal body <strong>of</strong> Chri<strong>st</strong>. A marvellous thought !<br />

But he was wedded to a new scheme.&quot; This new<br />

scheme,&quot; <strong>of</strong> which Waterland makes John <strong>of</strong> Damascus<br />

a votary, was the cause <strong>of</strong> image-worship. Upon<br />

this, in fact, Waterland lays the blame <strong>of</strong> much <strong>of</strong><br />

the innovation in theory which about this time began<br />

to prevail respecting the Holy Euchari<strong>st</strong>. &quot;The<br />

bread and wine,&quot;<br />

Damascenus goes on to say ( 271),<br />

is not a type <strong>of</strong> the body and blood <strong>of</strong> Chri<strong>st</strong> God<br />

:<br />

forbid ! but the very deified body <strong>of</strong> the Lord.&quot;<br />

Commenting upon language like this, Waterland<br />

tells us that the next time this new doctrine<br />

appeared upon the <strong>st</strong>age was in the service <strong>of</strong> imageworship,<br />

then creeping into the Church. They who<br />

opposed that innovation, kept up the ancient principle<br />

with regard to the elements <strong>of</strong> the Euchari<strong>st</strong> as<br />

symbols, figures, images ; pleading that our Lord had<br />

left no visible image <strong>of</strong> Himself, His incarnation,<br />

passion, sacrifice, &c., but that <strong>of</strong> the Euchari<strong>st</strong>. In<br />

reply to that plea, the innovators remon<strong>st</strong>rated again<strong>st</strong><br />

the symbolical nature <strong>of</strong> the Euchari<strong>st</strong>, contending<br />

that the consecrated elements were no images, types,<br />

or figures, but the very body and blood <strong>of</strong> Chri<strong>st</strong>,<br />

1<br />

literally Near as the language <strong>of</strong> Damascenus<br />

so.&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

1<br />

Epi<strong>st</strong>. ad Zachariam,&quot; p. 197.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!