st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
42 ST. JOHN OF DAMASCUS.<br />
years before, by Pope Martin I.<br />
published in 648 his religious<br />
When Con<strong>st</strong>ans had<br />
edict known as the<br />
Type, the exarch Olympius had orders to proceed<br />
from Ravenna to Rome, and there enforce the monothelete<br />
principles contained in it. On the death <strong>of</strong><br />
Olympius in 653, his successor, Calliopas, went on<br />
with the execution <strong>of</strong> these orders. Martin I. was<br />
seized by an armed band <strong>of</strong> the imperial soldiers in<br />
the Lateran church, and conveyed as a criminal to<br />
Con<strong>st</strong>antinople. In March, 655, he was banished to<br />
the Crimea, and there he died, after enduring the<br />
greate<strong>st</strong> privations, in September <strong>of</strong> the same year.<br />
It might seem <strong>st</strong>range to us, did we not recollect<br />
been enacted since,<br />
how <strong>of</strong>ten the same scenes have<br />
that such should be the practical outcome <strong>of</strong> opinions<br />
so purely theoretical as those above described. And<br />
yet it is only ignorance or indifference, that can<br />
dismiss the subject <strong>of</strong> these controversies is<br />
(as<br />
sometimes done) with only a ha<strong>st</strong>y expression <strong>of</strong><br />
contempt. I say advisedly, the subject, as di<strong>st</strong>in<br />
guished from the mode in which the dispute was<br />
carried on, or the practical results to which it led.<br />
"If we looked at this controversy from one side/<br />
writes the late Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Maurice, 1 "we<br />
might pro<br />
nounce it one <strong>of</strong> the mo<strong>st</strong> important and serious in<br />
which men were ever engaged the gathering up <strong>of</strong><br />
all previous disputes respecting freedom and neces<br />
sity, respecting the relation <strong>of</strong> the Divine will to<br />
the human, respecting the <strong>st</strong>ruggle<br />
in the heart <strong>of</strong> hu<br />
manity itself. All these arguments would seem to be<br />
1<br />
"Mediaeval Philosophy" (18*9), p. 29.