30.12.2013 Views

st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul

st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul

st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

42 ST. JOHN OF DAMASCUS.<br />

years before, by Pope Martin I.<br />

published in 648 his religious<br />

When Con<strong>st</strong>ans had<br />

edict known as the<br />

Type, the exarch Olympius had orders to proceed<br />

from Ravenna to Rome, and there enforce the monothelete<br />

principles contained in it. On the death <strong>of</strong><br />

Olympius in 653, his successor, Calliopas, went on<br />

with the execution <strong>of</strong> these orders. Martin I. was<br />

seized by an armed band <strong>of</strong> the imperial soldiers in<br />

the Lateran church, and conveyed as a criminal to<br />

Con<strong>st</strong>antinople. In March, 655, he was banished to<br />

the Crimea, and there he died, after enduring the<br />

greate<strong>st</strong> privations, in September <strong>of</strong> the same year.<br />

It might seem <strong>st</strong>range to us, did we not recollect<br />

been enacted since,<br />

how <strong>of</strong>ten the same scenes have<br />

that such should be the practical outcome <strong>of</strong> opinions<br />

so purely theoretical as those above described. And<br />

yet it is only ignorance or indifference, that can<br />

dismiss the subject <strong>of</strong> these controversies is<br />

(as<br />

sometimes done) with only a ha<strong>st</strong>y expression <strong>of</strong><br />

contempt. I say advisedly, the subject, as di<strong>st</strong>in<br />

guished from the mode in which the dispute was<br />

carried on, or the practical results to which it led.<br />

&quot;If we looked at this controversy from one side/<br />

writes the late Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Maurice, 1 &quot;we<br />

might pro<br />

nounce it one <strong>of</strong> the mo<strong>st</strong> important and serious in<br />

which men were ever engaged the gathering up <strong>of</strong><br />

all previous disputes respecting freedom and neces<br />

sity, respecting the relation <strong>of</strong> the Divine will to<br />

the human, respecting the <strong>st</strong>ruggle<br />

in the heart <strong>of</strong> hu<br />

manity itself. All these arguments would seem to be<br />

1<br />

&quot;Mediaeval Philosophy&quot; (18*9), p. 29.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!