30.12.2013 Views

st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul

st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul

st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

&quot;<br />

&quot;<br />

158 ST. JOHN OF DAMASCUS.<br />

Cologne edition <strong>of</strong> his writings, sixty-four consi<strong>st</strong><br />

entirely <strong>of</strong> biblical commentary, embracing illu<strong>st</strong>ra<br />

tions <strong>of</strong> almo<strong>st</strong> every portion <strong>of</strong> the inspired<br />

volume.&quot; 1<br />

Such was what one single scholar was doing in our<br />

own land in the early part <strong>of</strong> the eighth century. We<br />

have now to see how far St. John <strong>of</strong> Damascus was a<br />

fellow-labourer in the same field.<br />

The fir<strong>st</strong> <strong>of</strong> the three works referred to at the<br />

beginning <strong>of</strong> this chapter, and which, for shortness,<br />

be termed Loci Selecti,&quot;<br />

consi<strong>st</strong>s <strong>of</strong> a<br />

may<br />

selection <strong>of</strong> passages, chiefly from the Homilies <strong>of</strong><br />

Chryso<strong>st</strong>om, appended as a running commentary to<br />

the text <strong>of</strong> St. Paul s Epi<strong>st</strong>les. According to the<br />

exact title given by the author himself, Selections<br />

taken from the Catholic interpretation <strong>of</strong> John Chry<br />

so<strong>st</strong>om,&quot; it would seem as if he had begun by drawing<br />

his expositions entirely from the writings <strong>of</strong> that<br />

father. And, in fact, on the Epi<strong>st</strong>les to the Romans<br />

and Corinthians, the commentary is in the main from<br />

his homilies. But on others especially those to the<br />

Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians and Thessalonians<br />

it is not from Chryso<strong>st</strong>om but from Theodoret and<br />

Cyril <strong>of</strong> Alexandria, that the sub<strong>st</strong>ance <strong>of</strong> the annota<br />

tions is derived. 2 From the great brevity <strong>of</strong> the<br />

1<br />

L. A. Buckingham: &quot;The Bible in the Middle Ages&quot;<br />

1853), p. 29. A li<strong>st</strong> <strong>of</strong> Beda s commentaries is given by Proessor<br />

(<br />

Stubbs in his article under that name in the &quot;Dictionary<br />

<strong>of</strong> Chri<strong>st</strong>ian Biography.&quot;<br />

2<br />

This is pointed out by Lequien, who also observes that<br />

here are passages in the notes which appear to be written, if<br />

not by Damascene himself, at any rate by some one who lived<br />

after the rise <strong>of</strong> Ne<strong>st</strong>orianism ;<br />

terms peculiar to that heresy<br />

being used, as in the comment on Col. ii. 9.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!