st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
st. john of damascus (676-749 - Cristo Raul
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
"<br />
And<br />
"<br />
For<br />
"<br />
"<br />
He<br />
"<br />
De<br />
T24 ST. JOHN OF DAMASCUS.<br />
have had its name, either because it was meant to<br />
te<strong>st</strong> man s<br />
obedience, and would thus make his good<br />
or evil bias known ;<br />
or because its fruit would impart<br />
to those who partook <strong>of</strong> it a knowledge <strong>of</strong> their own<br />
true nature.<br />
The subject <strong>of</strong> God s<br />
plan for man s redemption,<br />
which is<br />
next discussed, leads to a digression on the<br />
tw<strong>of</strong>old nature and will <strong>of</strong> Chri<strong>st</strong>, in terms very<br />
similar to those employed in the Fide/ By<br />
c. xix. Damascene comes back more directly to his<br />
subject.<br />
since through man came death, it was<br />
right also that through man should be given the<br />
resurrection from the dead. Seeing that a rational<br />
soul <strong>of</strong> its own free will wrought the transgression, it<br />
was right that a rational soul, <strong>of</strong> its natural and own<br />
free will, should work obedience to the Creator ;<br />
and<br />
that Salvation should return through the same<br />
channels whereby Death had banished life, that<br />
Death might not deem himself a despot<br />
over man."<br />
This is followed by a singularly forced :<br />
metaphor<br />
what was the issue <strong>of</strong> this ? Death, after<br />
baiting for man with the hope <strong>of</strong> his becoming as<br />
God, was himself caught by the bait <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>fered<br />
flesh ;<br />
and after ta<strong>st</strong>ing a sinless body, became sick,<br />
and vomited forth, poor wretch, all the food that he<br />
had in his inside (c. xx.).<br />
It is fair to say that such<br />
<strong>st</strong>rained metaphors as this are not <strong>of</strong>ten found in our<br />
author, though he <strong>of</strong>ten errs in that direction. The<br />
passage which immediately follows, on the Cruci<br />
fixion, is not a bad example <strong>of</strong> the forced antithesis,<br />
and <strong>st</strong>riving after effect, which marks the decadence<br />
<strong>of</strong> a literature. who had fashioned man with