JOSEPH COHEN and GALIT DADOUN-COHEN, Individually and in ...
JOSEPH COHEN and GALIT DADOUN-COHEN, Individually and in ...
JOSEPH COHEN and GALIT DADOUN-COHEN, Individually and in ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
the birth, any non-medical conversations with Defendant Fur<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> “contact” with<br />
Defendant Rothman prior to the allegedly negligent care received at Lankenau Hospital<br />
do not affect the conclusion that proper venue lies <strong>in</strong> Montgomery County.<br />
II. THE COURT DID NOT ERR IN TRANSFERRING THE MATTER<br />
TO MONTGOMERY COUNTY BEFORE ALLOWING LIMITED DISCOVERY<br />
The st<strong>and</strong>ard of review <strong>in</strong> cases of venue is abuse of discretion. See Catagnus v.<br />
Allstate Ins. Co., 864 A.2d 1259, 1263, 2004 PA Super 486, *9 (Pa.Super. 2004). The<br />
trial court holds “considerable discretion” <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g the determ<strong>in</strong>ation to transfer venue.<br />
Id. “To determ<strong>in</strong>e whether venue is <strong>in</strong>deed improper, the trial court relies on facts raised<br />
‘by depositions or otherwise.’” Fritz v. Glen Mills Sch., 840 A.2d 1021, 1025, 2003 PA<br />
Super 516, *8 (Pa.Super. 2003) cit<strong>in</strong>g Pa.R.C.P. 1028(c)(2). After a review of the<br />
plead<strong>in</strong>gs, it may be “well with<strong>in</strong> the trial court’s discretion” to make f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of fact<br />
regard<strong>in</strong>g venue “without the benefit of sworn depositions or an evidentiary hear<strong>in</strong>g.” Id.<br />
Upon review of the plead<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>stant case, this Court assumes the factual<br />
allegations to be true. In particular, this Court does not f<strong>in</strong>d any controverted fact <strong>in</strong> the<br />
plead<strong>in</strong>gs regard<strong>in</strong>g Defendants Fur<strong>in</strong>, Maternal Wellness Center, Rothman, <strong>and</strong> Woman<br />
Wise Midwifery that would create venue <strong>in</strong> Philadelphia County. Thus, the Court did not<br />
err <strong>in</strong> transferr<strong>in</strong>g the matter to Montgomery County, Pennsylvania before allow<strong>in</strong>g<br />
limited discovery.<br />
CONCLUSION<br />
For the forego<strong>in</strong>g reasons, this Court believes that it properly granted prelim<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
objections of Defendants Eric Carlson, D.O., <strong>and</strong> Ma<strong>in</strong> L<strong>in</strong>e Per<strong>in</strong>atal Associates, thereby<br />
transferr<strong>in</strong>g the matter to the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County,<br />
13