Dichlorvos (DDVP) Risk Characterization Document - California ...
Dichlorvos (DDVP) Risk Characterization Document - California ... Dichlorvos (DDVP) Risk Characterization Document - California ...
Table 17. DDVP residue database. Residue Levels Commodity number highest mean a of samples (ppm) (ppm) RAC b cucumbers 10 0.055 0.0103 lettuce 8 0.026 0.0035 radishes 7 0.003 0.0015 tomatoes 9 0.023 0.0065 Meat Products c cattle d - 0.01 0.005 eggs - 0.05 0.05 goats - 0.02 0.02 horses - 0.02 0.02 milk d - 0.01 0.005 poultry - 0.05 0.05 sheep - 0.02 0.02 swine - 0.10 0.10 Processed commodities e chocolate chips 2 0.098 0.098 cocoa beans 2 0.025 0.0175 coconut 2 0.025 0.0175 flour 2 0.082 0.048 oats 1
Acute Exposure Estimates of potential acute dietary exposure used the highest measured residue values at or below the tolerance levels for each commodity except for the use of tolerance levels for meat products (Table 17 and Appendix A). The following assumptions are used to estimate potential acute dietary exposure from measured residues: (1) the residue does not change over time, (2) the concentration of residue does not decrease when the RAC is washed or cooked, and (3) all foods that are consumed will contain the highest reported residue. Chronic Exposure Estimates of potential average annual chronic dietary exposure used the mean of measured and "below detection limit" residue values for each commodity. The default procedure assumed that "below detection limit" residues were equal to one-half (50%) of the MDL for each commodity. The following assumptions were used to estimate potential chronic dietary exposures from measured residues: (1) the residue level does not change over time, (2) residue are not reduced by washing or cooking, and (3) exposures to a commodity at all reported residue levels do occur, i.e. a commodity with the average calculated residue is consumed every day at an average annual level (dosage). The actual residue values used are presented in Table 17. Lifetime Exposure Estimate of potential lifetime dietary exposure used the result for the US general population from the chronic dietary analysis. Dietary Assessment Dietary assessment of DDVP was conducted for acute, chronic, and lifetime exposures. Copies of the exposure analyses are available upon request to the Medical Toxicology Branch. Acute Exposure Acute dietary exposure analyses were conducted using the Exposure-4 software program developed by Technical Assessment Systems, Inc. (TAS). The Exposure-4 program estimates the distribution of user-day (consumer-day) exposure for the overall U.S. population and specific population subgroups (TAS, 1992a). A user-day is any day in which at least one food from the specific commodity list is consumed. The consumption analysis uses individual food consumption data as reported in the 1987-88 USDA Nationwide Food Consumption Survey (USDA, 1987-88). Based on the 95th percentile of user-days exposures for all specific population subgroups, the potential acute dietary exposure of DDVP from all labeled uses ranged from 0.50 to 1.65 ug/kg-day (Table 18). Children (1-6 years old) had the highest potential acute dietary exposure (1.65 ug/kg-day) to DDVP residues. Chronic Exposure The potential chronic dietary exposure was calculated using the Exposure-1 software program developed by TAS, Inc. (TAS, 1992b). The food consumption data for the chronic analysis were also based on the 1987-88 USDA Nationwide Food Consumption Survey (USDA, 1987-88). The program estimates the average annual exposure for all members of a designated population subgroup. The mean potential chronic dietary exposure for all population subgroups ranged from 0.06 to 0.53 ug/kgday (Table 18). The population subgroup of children (1-6 years) had the highest potential exposure (0.53 ug/kg-day). This level is 5,300-fold higher than the level (0.0001 ug/kg-day) estimated by the 66
- Page 21 and 22: DIMETHYL PHOSPHATE Oral - Rat Rats
- Page 23 and 24: B. ACUTE TOXICITY Summary: The acut
- Page 25 and 26: Oral - Human One hundred and eight
- Page 27 and 28: Table 1. The acute toxicity of DDVP
- Page 29 and 30: Table 1. The acute toxicity of DDVP
- Page 31 and 32: Table 2. Selected no-observed-effec
- Page 33 and 34: dose-related manner. At a dosage of
- Page 35 and 36: pretreatment levels, respectively.
- Page 37 and 38: Table 3. Selected no-observed-effec
- Page 39 and 40: Gavage - Rat In a study conducted b
- Page 41 and 42: ate (Appendix D) and the assumption
- Page 43 and 44: Gavage - Mouse In a study conducted
- Page 45 and 46: Capsules - Dog DDVP (97.3-99.5% pur
- Page 47 and 48: Table 9. The no-observed-effect lev
- Page 49 and 50: Mice exposed to DDVP by inhalation
- Page 51 and 52: F. REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY Summary: E
- Page 53 and 54: Table 11. The dosages and the inhib
- Page 55 and 56: G. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY Summary:
- Page 57 and 58: levels not verified, too few pregna
- Page 59 and 60: H. NEUROTOXICITY Summary: Possible
- Page 61 and 62: IV. RISK ASSESSMENT A. HAZARD IDENT
- Page 63 and 64: Acute Toxicity Inhalation The criti
- Page 65 and 66: ates were not statistically signifi
- Page 67 and 68: In mice, there were dose-related in
- Page 69 and 70: B. EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The exposure
- Page 71: The U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Page 75 and 76: Table 19. Commodity contribution of
- Page 77 and 78: C. RISK CHARACTERIZATION The potent
- Page 79 and 80: Table 23. The margins of safety for
- Page 81 and 82: Table 25. The margins of safety of
- Page 83 and 84: label between treatment and the ava
- Page 85 and 86: VI. TOLERANCE ASSESSMENT A. BACKGRO
- Page 87 and 88: VII. CONCLUSIONS The toxicological
- Page 89 and 90: Bomhard, E., and M. Rinke, 1994. Fr
- Page 91 and 92: DPR, 1992. Sampling for pesticide r
- Page 93 and 94: Horn, K.-H., B. Teichmann, and T. S
- Page 95 and 96: NTP (National Toxicology Program),
- Page 97 and 98: TAS, 1992a. Exposure 4 . Detailed
- Page 99 and 100: Warf Institute Inc., 1977c. Acute e
- Page 101 and 102: APPENDIX A U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTE
- Page 103 and 104: APPENDIX B Department of Pesticide
- Page 105 and 106: TABLE 2: Percent DDVP Dermal Absorp
- Page 107 and 108: RESIDENT EXPOSURES Environmental mo
- Page 109 and 110: post-treatment, respectively. Glove
- Page 111 and 112: Ross, J.H., H.R. Fong, , T. Thongsi
- Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX C NALED TOXICOLOGY OF NALE
- Page 115 and 116: APPENDIX D CALCULATION EQUATIONS 1.
- Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX E ONCOGENICITY POTENCY CAL
- Page 119: APPENDIX E (continued) ONCOGENICITY
Table 17.<br />
<strong>DDVP</strong> residue database.<br />
Residue Levels<br />
Commodity number highest mean a<br />
of samples (ppm) (ppm)<br />
RAC b<br />
cucumbers 10 0.055 0.0103<br />
lettuce 8 0.026 0.0035<br />
radishes 7 0.003 0.0015<br />
tomatoes 9 0.023 0.0065<br />
Meat Products c<br />
cattle d - 0.01 0.005<br />
eggs - 0.05 0.05<br />
goats - 0.02 0.02<br />
horses - 0.02 0.02<br />
milk d - 0.01 0.005<br />
poultry - 0.05 0.05<br />
sheep - 0.02 0.02<br />
swine - 0.10 0.10<br />
Processed commodities e<br />
chocolate chips 2 0.098 0.098<br />
cocoa beans 2 0.025 0.0175<br />
coconut 2 0.025 0.0175<br />
flour 2 0.082 0.048<br />
oats 1