Dichlorvos (DDVP) Risk Characterization Document - California ...

Dichlorvos (DDVP) Risk Characterization Document - California ... Dichlorvos (DDVP) Risk Characterization Document - California ...

30.12.2013 Views

Executive Summary INTRODUCTION This Risk Characterization Document for dichlorvos (DDVP) addresses potential human exposures from its use in California. Oncogenic, genotoxic, and neurotoxic effects have been identified in animal studies. DDVP is listed under California Proposition 65, the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, as a chemical known to the State of California to cause cancer. DDVP is an insecticide used for space spray treatment of food processing, handling, and storage plants; feedlots; stockyards; corrals; holding pens; animal buildings; poultry houses; as well as residential, commercial and institutional buildings. It is also used in flea collars for pets. The direct food uses are on vegetables grown in greenhouses, on livestock, and processed food items to control pests. Humans may be exposed to DDVP through inhalation, direct contact on the skin, and the diet. THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS The risk assessment process consists of four aspects: hazard identification, dose response assessment, exposure evaluation, and risk characterization. Hazard identification entails review and evaluation of the toxicological properties of each pesticide. The dose-response assessment then considers the toxicological properties and estimates the amount which could potentially cause an adverse effect. The amount which will not result in an observable or measurable effect is the no-observed-effect level, NOEL. A basic premise of toxicology is that at a high enough dose, virtually all substances will cause some toxic manifestation. Chemicals are often referred to as "dangerous" or "safe", as though these concepts were absolutes. In reality, these terms describe chemicals which require low or high dosages, respectively, to cause toxic effects. Toxicological activity is determined in a battery of experimental studies which define the types of toxic effects which can be caused, and the exposure levels (doses) at which effects may be seen. State and federal testing requirements mandate that substances be tested in laboratory animals at doses high enough to produce toxic effects, even if such levels are many times higher than those to which people might be exposed. The exposure assessment includes an estimation of the potential exposure through the occupational, residential, and dietary routes on an acute (one time) and chronic (long-term and lifetime) basis. The levels of exposure are determined by the amount of pesticide residue in the air or on specific commodities and processed foods, and the exposure rates by inhalation or ingestion. The risk characterization integrates the toxic effects observed in the laboratory studies, conducted with high dosages of pesticide, to potential human exposures to low dosages of pesticide residues in the air and diet. The potential for possible non-cancer adverse health effects in human population after acute and chronic exposures (long-term and lifetime) is generally expressed as the margin of safety, which is the ratio of the dosage which produced no effects in laboratory studies to the estimated exposure dosage. For cancer effects after potential lifetime exposures, the probability of risk is calculated as the product of the cancer potency of the pesticide and the estimated exposure dosage. BACKGROUND INFORMATION DDVP is currently in Special Review, a process by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) to determine the risk and benefit for the use of the pesticide. The major concerns are the inhibition of cholinesterase (ChE) activity, cancer, and nerve damage effects observed in animal studies. Cholinesterase is an essential enzyme in the body for the degradation of acetylcholine, a i

transmitter of signals from the nerve to another nerve or muscles. The inhibition of ChE results in cholinergic signs such as salivation, diarrhea, tremors, respiratory failure, and death due to the accumulation of acetylcholine and over-stimulation of nerves or muscles. USEPA has proposed the revocation of DDVP tolerances for processed commodities because of concerns on DDVP-induced cancer in experimental animals. TOXICOLOGY Cholinergic signs (tremors and diarrhea) and death in experimental animals were the most sensitive endpoints for the acute toxicity of DDVP after inhalation and oral exposures. The dose (the noobserved-effect level or NOEL) at which death and cholinergic signs did not occur was used to quantitate the hazard for potential one-time exposure to humans. The long-term (chronic) health hazard to humans from repeated exposures to DDVP was evaluated based on the inhibition of cholinesterase activity in the brain observed in both inhalation and oral studies. The cancer risk from lifetime exposure was evaluated based on the finding of leukemia in rats after chronic oral exposure. EXPOSURE ANALYSIS The potential exposure scenarios of humans to DDVP include the work place, home, and the food. Workers are exposed to DDVP in the work place due to warehouse fumigation, livestock applications, and structural applications. The general population is exposed to DDVP in the home from the uses as directed spray, fogger, flea collars, and no-pest strips; as well as in the diet from the use of DDVP on vegetables, livestock, and processed foods. The worker exposure was also assessed in combination with exposure at home (from home use and in the diet). RISK EVALUATION A margin of safety (MOS) of at least 100 is generally considered sufficient to be protective of human health. The following exposure groups have MOSs greater than 100: chronic exposure of residents after structural fumigation; acute and chronic exposures of pet owners to flea collars; acute dietary exposure of all population subgroups; and chronic dietary exposure of all subgroups, except children 1 to 6 years old. The following exposure groups have MOSs less than 100 for non-oncogenic effects: acute, chronic, and lifetime exposures for all workers exposed to DDVP only at work and in combination with exposure at home; acute exposure of residents after structural fumigation; acute, chronic, and lifetime exposures of residents to home-use foggers; acute and chronic exposures of children to no-pest strips; and chronic dietary exposure of children 1 to 6 years old. For oncogenic effects, the excess lifetime oncogenic risks of the workers, residents, and the general population exposed to DDVP at work, at home, or in the diet and in combinations were greater than the benchmark oncogenic risk level of 1 x 10 -6 which is generally considered protective of human health. The MOSs for the acute exposure to DDVP on vegetables and livestock products at tolerance levels are greater than 100. ii

Executive Summary<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

This <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Characterization</strong> <strong>Document</strong> for dichlorvos (<strong>DDVP</strong>) addresses potential human exposures<br />

from its use in <strong>California</strong>. Oncogenic, genotoxic, and neurotoxic effects have been identified in animal<br />

studies. <strong>DDVP</strong> is listed under <strong>California</strong> Proposition 65, the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic<br />

Enforcement Act of 1986, as a chemical known to the State of <strong>California</strong> to cause cancer.<br />

<strong>DDVP</strong> is an insecticide used for space spray treatment of food processing, handling, and storage<br />

plants; feedlots; stockyards; corrals; holding pens; animal buildings; poultry houses; as well as<br />

residential, commercial and institutional buildings. It is also used in flea collars for pets. The direct<br />

food uses are on vegetables grown in greenhouses, on livestock, and processed food items to control<br />

pests. Humans may be exposed to <strong>DDVP</strong> through inhalation, direct contact on the skin, and the diet.<br />

THE RISK ASSESSMENT PROCESS<br />

The risk assessment process consists of four aspects: hazard identification, dose response<br />

assessment, exposure evaluation, and risk characterization.<br />

Hazard identification entails review and evaluation of the toxicological properties of each pesticide.<br />

The dose-response assessment then considers the toxicological properties and estimates the amount<br />

which could potentially cause an adverse effect. The amount which will not result in an observable or<br />

measurable effect is the no-observed-effect level, NOEL. A basic premise of toxicology is that at a<br />

high enough dose, virtually all substances will cause some toxic manifestation. Chemicals are often<br />

referred to as "dangerous" or "safe", as though these concepts were absolutes. In reality, these terms<br />

describe chemicals which require low or high dosages, respectively, to cause toxic effects.<br />

Toxicological activity is determined in a battery of experimental studies which define the types of toxic<br />

effects which can be caused, and the exposure levels (doses) at which effects may be seen. State<br />

and federal testing requirements mandate that substances be tested in laboratory animals at doses<br />

high enough to produce toxic effects, even if such levels are many times higher than those to which<br />

people might be exposed.<br />

The exposure assessment includes an estimation of the potential exposure through the occupational,<br />

residential, and dietary routes on an acute (one time) and chronic (long-term and lifetime) basis. The<br />

levels of exposure are determined by the amount of pesticide residue in the air or on specific<br />

commodities and processed foods, and the exposure rates by inhalation or ingestion.<br />

The risk characterization integrates the toxic effects observed in the laboratory studies, conducted<br />

with high dosages of pesticide, to potential human exposures to low dosages of pesticide residues in<br />

the air and diet. The potential for possible non-cancer adverse health effects in human population<br />

after acute and chronic exposures (long-term and lifetime) is generally expressed as the margin of<br />

safety, which is the ratio of the dosage which produced no effects in laboratory studies to the<br />

estimated exposure dosage. For cancer effects after potential lifetime exposures, the probability of<br />

risk is calculated as the product of the cancer potency of the pesticide and the estimated exposure<br />

dosage.<br />

BACKGROUND INFORMATION<br />

<strong>DDVP</strong> is currently in Special Review, a process by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency<br />

(USEPA) to determine the risk and benefit for the use of the pesticide. The major concerns are the<br />

inhibition of cholinesterase (ChE) activity, cancer, and nerve damage effects observed in animal<br />

studies. Cholinesterase is an essential enzyme in the body for the degradation of acetylcholine, a<br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!