Dichlorvos (DDVP) Risk Characterization Document - California ...
Dichlorvos (DDVP) Risk Characterization Document - California ... Dichlorvos (DDVP) Risk Characterization Document - California ...
IX. APPENDICES A. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Tolerances for DDVP B. Occupational Exposure Assessment C. Toxicology of Naled and Trichlorfon D. Calculation Equations E. Oncogenicity Potency Calculations 93
APPENDIX A U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY TOLERANCES FOR DDVP Tolerances for residues of DDVP are established as follows: (from 40 Code of Federal Regulations 180.235 and 21 CFR 556.180) Commodity Tolerance level (ppm) cattle, fat 0.02 cattle, meat 0.02 cattle, mbyp* 0.02 cucumbers (residues expressed as naled) 0.5 eggs 0.05 goats, fat 0.02 goats, meat 0.02 goats, mbyp 0.02 horses, fat 0.02 horses, meat 0.02 horses, mbyp 0.02 lettuce (residues expressed as naled) 1 milk 0.02 mushrooms (residues expressed as naled) 0.5 poultry, fat 0.05 poultry, meat 0.05 poultry, mbyp 0.05 radishes 0.5 raw agricultural commodities, nonperishable, bulk stored regardless of fat content 0.5 packaged or bagged, containing 6 percent fat or less 0.5 packaged or bagged, containing > 6 percent fat 2 sheep, fat 0.02 sheep, meat 0.02 sheep, mbyp 0.02 swine, edible tissue 0.1 (anthelmintic in feed and/or direct application) tomatoes (residues expressed as naled) 0.05 *mbyp= meat byproducts
- Page 49 and 50: Mice exposed to DDVP by inhalation
- Page 51 and 52: F. REPRODUCTIVE TOXICITY Summary: E
- Page 53 and 54: Table 11. The dosages and the inhib
- Page 55 and 56: G. DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY Summary:
- Page 57 and 58: levels not verified, too few pregna
- Page 59 and 60: H. NEUROTOXICITY Summary: Possible
- Page 61 and 62: IV. RISK ASSESSMENT A. HAZARD IDENT
- Page 63 and 64: Acute Toxicity Inhalation The criti
- Page 65 and 66: ates were not statistically signifi
- Page 67 and 68: In mice, there were dose-related in
- Page 69 and 70: B. EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT The exposure
- Page 71 and 72: The U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Page 73 and 74: Acute Exposure Estimates of potenti
- Page 75 and 76: Table 19. Commodity contribution of
- Page 77 and 78: C. RISK CHARACTERIZATION The potent
- Page 79 and 80: Table 23. The margins of safety for
- Page 81 and 82: Table 25. The margins of safety of
- Page 83 and 84: label between treatment and the ava
- Page 85 and 86: VI. TOLERANCE ASSESSMENT A. BACKGRO
- Page 87 and 88: VII. CONCLUSIONS The toxicological
- Page 89 and 90: Bomhard, E., and M. Rinke, 1994. Fr
- Page 91 and 92: DPR, 1992. Sampling for pesticide r
- Page 93 and 94: Horn, K.-H., B. Teichmann, and T. S
- Page 95 and 96: NTP (National Toxicology Program),
- Page 97 and 98: TAS, 1992a. Exposure 4 . Detailed
- Page 99: Warf Institute Inc., 1977c. Acute e
- Page 103 and 104: APPENDIX B Department of Pesticide
- Page 105 and 106: TABLE 2: Percent DDVP Dermal Absorp
- Page 107 and 108: RESIDENT EXPOSURES Environmental mo
- Page 109 and 110: post-treatment, respectively. Glove
- Page 111 and 112: Ross, J.H., H.R. Fong, , T. Thongsi
- Page 113 and 114: APPENDIX C NALED TOXICOLOGY OF NALE
- Page 115 and 116: APPENDIX D CALCULATION EQUATIONS 1.
- Page 117 and 118: APPENDIX E ONCOGENICITY POTENCY CAL
- Page 119: APPENDIX E (continued) ONCOGENICITY
IX. APPENDICES<br />
A. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Tolerances for <strong>DDVP</strong><br />
B. Occupational Exposure Assessment<br />
C. Toxicology of Naled and Trichlorfon<br />
D. Calculation Equations<br />
E. Oncogenicity Potency Calculations<br />
93
Change language