30.12.2013 Views

Dichlorvos (DDVP) Risk Characterization Document - California ...

Dichlorvos (DDVP) Risk Characterization Document - California ...

Dichlorvos (DDVP) Risk Characterization Document - California ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Oncogenic risk was determined based on the finding of mononuclear leukemia in rats given <strong>DDVP</strong> by<br />

gavage for 2 years. The human equivalent potency factors were 0.20 mg/kg-day -1 for q 1 and 0.35<br />

mg/kg-day -1 for q 1 *, the 95th percentile upper confidence limit.<br />

Exposure Assessment- The potential health hazard associated with the use of <strong>DDVP</strong> was<br />

considered for occupational, residential, and dietary exposures under acute, chronic, and lifetime<br />

scenarios. The population subgroups exposed to <strong>DDVP</strong> in the work place were workers involved in<br />

warehouse fumigation, livestock applications, and structural applications. Residential exposures to<br />

<strong>DDVP</strong> were due to the use of liquid sprays, foggers, no-pest strips, and flea collars. Dietary<br />

exposures to <strong>DDVP</strong> were due to the use on raw agricultural commodities (RAC), livestock, and<br />

processed foods. Estimates for chronic dietary exposure by USEPA were also assessed.<br />

RISK APPRAISAL<br />

The margins of safety (MOSs) for non-oncogenic effects from acute, chronic, and lifetime occupational<br />

exposures were less than 100 for the workers involved in warehouse fumigation, livestock<br />

applications, and structural applications. The lifetime oncogenic risk for the workers was greater than<br />

1 x 10 -6 .<br />

For residential exposure, the MOSs for non-oncogenic effects were greater than 100 only for<br />

structural residents (chronic and lifetime), and pet owners (acute, chronic, and lifetime). The MOSs<br />

were less than 100 for all other home uses under acute, chronic, and lifetime exposures. The lifetime<br />

oncogenic risk for the residents under all exposure scenarios was greater than 1 x 10 -6<br />

For dietary exposure assessment using either USEPA or DPR exposure estimates, the MOSs for nononcogenic<br />

effects were at or greater than 100 for all population subgroups for acute and chronic<br />

exposure. For lifetime exposure to all commodities, the oncogenic risk for the U.S. population was<br />

greater than 1 x 10 -6 for both DPR and USEPA estimates.<br />

For combined exposures in the work place and at home, the MOSs for non-oncogenic effects for all<br />

the workers were less than 100 and the lifetime oncogenic risk was greater than 1 x 10 -6 .<br />

TOLERANCE ASSESSMENT<br />

The MOSs for the acute exposure based on individual tolerances on RACs and livestock products<br />

were greater than 100.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

The toxicological risk of potential exposure to <strong>DDVP</strong> was evaluated for occupational, residential,<br />

dietary and combined uses based on the inhibition of brain ChE activity, clinical signs, and the finding<br />

of mononuclear leukemia in animal studies. Using the conventional benchmark levels, a margin of<br />

safety of at least 100 for non-oncogenic effects and a risk level of 1 x 10 -6 or less for oncogenic effects<br />

are generally considered sufficiently protective of human health. The exposure levels of only a few<br />

groups meet those benchmark levels. Groups which have exposure levels which do not meet the<br />

benchmark levels are: all people occupationally exposed to <strong>DDVP</strong> alone and in combination with<br />

home exposure on an acute, chronic, and lifetime basis; people exposed through residential use on<br />

an acute, chronic, and lifetime basis; and the general population exposed through the diet on a<br />

potentially lifetime basis.<br />

3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!