Effectiveness Review of Council 2013 - Cardiff University
Effectiveness Review of Council 2013 - Cardiff University
Effectiveness Review of Council 2013 - Cardiff University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
12/710<br />
Recommendation 9 – consideration should be given to setting up a<br />
programme <strong>of</strong> visits for lay Members or to establishing a means <strong>of</strong><br />
arranging individual visits.<br />
.7 In order to keep abreast <strong>of</strong> changes and benchmarking with other<br />
comparable Universities it is recommended that all members should<br />
commit to CPD on governance issues (staff members will have to be<br />
centrally funded to do this). This could usefully be discussed at the one to<br />
one meetings with the Chair <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
Recommendation 10 - the <strong>University</strong> should consider how best to tailor<br />
individual development needs <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong> members and should consider<br />
providing all lay members with access to the TImes Higher Education so<br />
that they have a broader information base.<br />
.8 There is general support for the idea that Away Days should remain an<br />
important part <strong>of</strong> the calendar as time for discussion <strong>of</strong> new strategies as<br />
well as review <strong>of</strong> performance against targets. Members expressed a view<br />
that awaydays presented a real opportunity to contribute to strategic<br />
development.<br />
Recommendation 11 - is to keep under review whether a half day could<br />
be given to performance review and another day for “forward thinking<br />
and development <strong>of</strong> the business.<br />
7. <strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> Committees<br />
7.1 At its meeting held on 11 July 2011 <strong>Council</strong> approved a series <strong>of</strong> changes to<br />
the committee structures. This followed meetings under the auspices <strong>of</strong> the<br />
<strong>Cardiff</strong> Futures programme. <strong>Council</strong> also agreed to review the impact <strong>of</strong><br />
these changes and in this regard an interim interview was reported to <strong>Council</strong><br />
on 7 July 2012 with a further review to follow before the end <strong>of</strong> session<br />
2012/13.<br />
7.2 The aim <strong>of</strong> the changes in 2011 was:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
To increase the efficiency and effectiveness <strong>of</strong> the decision making<br />
structure <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong>;<br />
To ensure effective governance and assure transparency and<br />
accountability;<br />
To decrease duplication <strong>of</strong> business; and<br />
To increase consultation and representation <strong>of</strong> key stakeholders, thereby<br />
improving engagement and communication.<br />
7.3 As a consequence the following changes were introduced:<br />
.1 Research Committee, Learning and Teaching Committee and Innovation<br />
and Engagement Committee were put into abeyance for Session 2011/12,<br />
replaced by Policy Networks. The Committees were subsequently formally<br />
disestablished by <strong>Council</strong>.<br />
.2 Human Resources Committee was abolished and replaced by a Policy<br />
Network;<br />
.3 the work <strong>of</strong> existing Committees such as Academic Promotions, Awards &<br />
Progress, Equality and Diversity, was undertaken by Standing Panels with<br />
specific authority delegated to them by parent Committees in the new<br />
6