Effectiveness Review of Council 2013 - Cardiff University
Effectiveness Review of Council 2013 - Cardiff University
Effectiveness Review of Council 2013 - Cardiff University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
12/710<br />
There is a good balance <strong>of</strong> skills, in business, finance, legal, risk, public, private etc. That<br />
enables 360 degree consideration before decisions are made.<br />
There is a longstanding problem in the <strong>University</strong>, particularly as a result <strong>of</strong> the previous<br />
VC's management style, <strong>of</strong> the administrative tail being allowed to wag the academic dog.<br />
This has affected the way in which priorities are set, and this needs to change.<br />
Too much discussion <strong>of</strong> operations/detail<br />
We need people who can apply good *judgment*; this comes from many different<br />
backgrounds. But having someone who knows the lingo and expectations in key operational<br />
fields is a very useful thing to give <strong>Council</strong> assurance<br />
6. Do you think <strong>Council</strong> meetings engender sufficient challenge to be able to call the<br />
executive to account?<br />
Yes: 8<br />
No: 2<br />
Sometimes: 14<br />
Other: 0<br />
7. Do you think that <strong>Council</strong> meetings and Awaydays promote clear strategic development?<br />
Please comment below<br />
Awaydays are the best for promoting strategic plans.<br />
<strong>Council</strong> meetings are developing a clear direction. Awaydays helpful.<br />
<strong>Council</strong> meetings are more effective than awaydays. Awaydays are used largely by the<br />
Management for propaganda purposes.<br />
I hope so.<br />
I support focussed meeting for strategy and the awaydays are the correct means to achieve<br />
this<br />
I think the Away day does, however, <strong>Council</strong> meetings are less good at this and as a<br />
consequence we can appear to deal with strategy only once a year. I think that Lay<br />
members should give some thought to how the routine <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong> business develops and<br />
promotes the agreed strategy.<br />
I'm never sure whether they should do or not. There isn't much strategic development rather<br />
assurance <strong>of</strong> the executives strategy which is probably what they should be doing.<br />
If this question is about whether meetings <strong>of</strong>fer an opportunity for members to significantly<br />
engage with the development <strong>of</strong> <strong>University</strong> strategy, I do not think they do. Having been a<br />
member <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong> for almost three years now, I find that strategic development has not<br />
been a collaborative effort between the <strong>University</strong> and <strong>Council</strong> members. In the past, I <strong>of</strong>ten<br />
felt we were being presented a ready-made strategy and our role was simply to adhere to it.<br />
However, I see signs that this is now changing.<br />
Increasingly.<br />
It helps info exchange among council members and good presentations strengthen their<br />
ability to act as effective ambassadors for CU<br />
No - see above.<br />
No. We need to review the role <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong> in developing strategy and how <strong>Council</strong>'s input fits<br />
into the strategic planning process.<br />
Sometimes<br />
Sometimes. The awaydays have been useful but things tend to get presented piecemeal as<br />
fait accompli at the business meetings rather than a overall strategy.<br />
12