the attic stelai - The American School of Classical Studies at Athens
the attic stelai - The American School of Classical Studies at Athens the attic stelai - The American School of Classical Studies at Athens
THE ATTIC STELAI 275 cement floors, paved courts, and, in all likelihood, a second storey. The ground plan included two rows of three rooms each and four sheds or the like.9" A comparison of the prices recorded in our list of 414 B.C. with the values in fourth century Athens and elsewhere shows clearly that our Stelai give minimum figures much lower than all other minima. One house in a coastal deme was sold for 105 drachmas; one plot of land in Aphidna brought only 10 drachmas. This compares with a minimum of 300 drachmas for a house and 2000 drachmas for a chorion in Table C (Attic Orators). The minimum prices for a house on 19 prasis epi lysei horoi and 6 dotal horoi were 200 and 300 drachmas respectively.100 The highest preserved price for real estate in our list in Table A, 1900 drachmas, was for three items, a house in cagros and two plots of land under cultivation. The minimum value for an agros alone in Table C, on the other hand, is 6000 drachmas. Whether the explanation for our low prices lies in very small plots or in the general economic picture of the war year 414 B.C. cannot be determined on the evidence of real estate alone. Although our evidence is admittedly very limited, one or two generalizations may be proffered. Of the seven houses sold by the poletai in Tables A and D, the median value is 410 drachmas. This is in striking contrast with a median value of 2000 drachmas for fourteen houses reported from the Attic Orators, whereas the median value of 19 houses in the prasis epi lysei horoi and of six houses in the dotal apotimenc horoi are 700 and 750 drachmas, respectively. Clearly, the values of real estate mentioned in the Attic Orators must not be taken as indicating the average wealth of Athenians. Indeed, the values of real estate in Table C run considerably higher than the values on dotal apotimena horoi, which Finley has taken to mark the property of the very wealthiest Athenians."1' Such land values as occur in the orators were far beyond the reach of the poorer Athenians, who might readily, on the other hand, have rented such properties as were sold in our Stelai. There remains to be said a word about the evidence from our Stelai that successful Athenians would buy land in several parts of Attica. Euphiletos of Kydathenaion, for example, owned land on the coast in the demes of Semachidai and Myrrhinoutta, which were in the widely separated phylai of Aigeis and Antiochis, and inland in the demes of Gargettos and Aphidna, which were in the phylai of Aigeis and Aiantis. Polystratos of Ankyle owned property in his own deme, located east of the city walls, as well as in Mounychia. This is in accord with other evidence that rich Athenians 99 See Robinson and Graham, op. cit., pp. 83-84. It should be noted, however, that Robinson himself later (Olynthus, XII, pp. 72-73) argued that the price of 2000 drachmas was for half a house. In collecting figures for the prices of Olynthian houses he observed that other houses, apparently three in number, in the same section brought 4000, 4500, and 5300 drachmas, respectively. There is nothing in the text of the inscription, a deed of sale, to suggest that this was only half a house: reference is made simply to an oikia. 100 See Finley, op. cit., pp. 173, 175. 101 Op. cit., pp. 79 ff. But see note 88 above.
276 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT usually became large land-holders without forming large estates, and that Attica was almost unacquainted with the agrarian system which consists in the formation of vast continuous domains organized for cultivation.102 On the extent of holdings in non-Attic territory, more will be said elsewhere, since the main evidence in our Stelai comes from the summaries which included the totals for all types of possessions. It may be noted here, however, that line 15 of Stele IV, which contained the word lrEpopfta, ' foreign land,' seems to be the heading for a list of real property owned abroad. Whereas the real property listed above line 15 was located in Attica, the first item beneath the heading was in Euboea. The property was owned by Nikides of Melite, and included a house. The remainder of the stele is fragmentary. In Stele VI, lines 55-56, the property of Adeimantos of Skambonidai included a house and agros on the island of Thasos. The real estate, including pithoi, was sold for a price which contained six numerals. Only the last three figures are preserved, but the sum could not have been less than 950 drachmas and may well have been much more. Finally, in Stele VII, line 78, there is clear reference to property at Abydos, which I take to be the city of that name on the Hellespont. VI. SLAVES With regard to slave problems in Greece, Zimmern wrote over twenty-five years ago: " the same authors are ransacked; the same evidence is marshalled; the same references and footnotes are transferred, like stale tea leaves, from one learned receptable to another." 1 Our inscriptions, if preserved complete, would have shed much new light on the whole problem of slavery. But even in their fragmentary condition, the Agora pieces do contribute some measure of new information about prices and nationalities, in particular.2 PRICES The average price for the twenty-five slaves whose sales prices are complete is approximately 174 drachmas. One of our slaves was described as a young child (Oaat&ov) and sold for 72 drachmas, another as a child (7raZS) and sold for 174 drachmas, the average fee for an adult. The average price for the five women was 178 drachmas; for the seventeen men, 179 drachmas.3 The sex of the Cappadocian is uncertain. 102 See, for example, Glotz, op. cit., pp. 299-300; and Michell, Ec. of Anc. Greece, pp. 43-44. ' Solon and Croesus, London, 1928, p. 106. Quoted by W. L. Westermann in Athenian Studies Presented to W. S. Ferguson (= Harv. Stud. Class. Phil., Suppl. Vol. I, 1940), p. 452. 2 The slaves listed in Stele XI have not been considered in this section because of the uncertain nature of the list. 3 I find no basis for Andreades' statement (Hist. of Gr. Pub. Finance, I, p. 283) that in the fifth century the average price of women slaves was somewhat higher than that of men. Andreades himself notes that this was not the case at Delphi during the second century.
- Page 47 and 48: 224 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT ' four-ch
- Page 49 and 50: 226 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT He also e
- Page 51 and 52: 228 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT B.C.), th
- Page 53 and 54: 230 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT slumberin
- Page 55 and 56: 232 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT Whereas c
- Page 57 and 58: 234 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT estate,'5
- Page 59 and 60: 236 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT in width
- Page 61 and 62: 238 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT compared
- Page 63 and 64: 240 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT (IX, 9) u
- Page 65 and 66: 242 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT and Arist
- Page 67 and 68: 244 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT the ceili
- Page 69 and 70: 246 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT individua
- Page 71 and 72: 248 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT that of t
- Page 73 and 74: 250 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT Bliimner,
- Page 75 and 76: 252 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT be smikro
- Page 77 and 78: 254 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT Pollux (X
- Page 79 and 80: 256 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT hekatomb
- Page 81 and 82: 258 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT exception
- Page 83 and 84: 260 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT another s
- Page 85 and 86: 262 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT authors;
- Page 87 and 88: 264 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT These lot
- Page 89 and 90: 266 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT Leges whe
- Page 91 and 92: 268 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT 10. CrV'O
- Page 93 and 94: 270 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT TABLE A:
- Page 95 and 96: 272 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT Sales Pri
- Page 97: 274 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT obligatio
- Page 101 and 102: 278 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT Country P
- Page 103 and 104: 280 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT lists the
- Page 105 and 106: 282 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT tegula).'
- Page 107 and 108: 284 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT Corinthia
- Page 109 and 110: 286 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT in the co
- Page 111 and 112: 288 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT ov8ELt &
- Page 113 and 114: 290 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT 85 drachm
- Page 115 and 116: 292 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT culis, 29
- Page 117 and 118: 294 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT In the Ed
- Page 119 and 120: 296 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT 12. (vXa
- Page 121 and 122: 298 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT suggested
- Page 123 and 124: 300 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT Eustathiu
- Page 125 and 126: 302 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT or in a s
- Page 127 and 128: 304 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT Saglio, D
- Page 129 and 130: 306 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT from xap6
- Page 131 and 132: 308 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT 8opa&nov
- Page 133 and 134: 310 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT effect th
- Page 135 and 136: 312 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT peter, an
- Page 137 and 138: 314 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT The simpl
- Page 139 and 140: 316 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT ADDENDA E
- Page 141 and 142: 318 ANNE PIPPIN THE DEMIOPRATA OF P
- Page 143 and 144: 320 ANNE PIPPIN POLLUX X ATTIC STEL
- Page 145 and 146: 322 ANNE PIPPIN source in which he
- Page 147 and 148: 324 ANNE PIPPIN thenes made use of
276 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT<br />
usually became large land-holders without forming large est<strong>at</strong>es, and th<strong>at</strong> Attica was<br />
almost unacquainted with <strong>the</strong> agrarian system which consists in <strong>the</strong> form<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> vast<br />
continuous domains organized for cultiv<strong>at</strong>ion.102<br />
On <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> holdings in non-Attic territory, more will be said elsewhere,<br />
since <strong>the</strong> main evidence in our Stelai comes from <strong>the</strong> summaries which included <strong>the</strong><br />
totals for all types <strong>of</strong> possessions. It may be noted here, however, th<strong>at</strong> line 15 <strong>of</strong> Stele<br />
IV, which contained <strong>the</strong> word lrEpopfta, ' foreign land,' seems to be <strong>the</strong> heading for a<br />
list <strong>of</strong> real property owned abroad. Whereas <strong>the</strong> real property listed above line 15<br />
was loc<strong>at</strong>ed in Attica, <strong>the</strong> first item bene<strong>at</strong>h <strong>the</strong> heading was in Euboea. <strong>The</strong> property<br />
was owned by Nikides <strong>of</strong> Melite, and included a house. <strong>The</strong> remainder <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> stele<br />
is fragmentary. In Stele VI, lines 55-56, <strong>the</strong> property <strong>of</strong> Adeimantos <strong>of</strong> Skambonidai<br />
included a house and agros on <strong>the</strong> island <strong>of</strong> Thasos. <strong>The</strong> real est<strong>at</strong>e, including pithoi,<br />
was sold for a price which contained six numerals. Only <strong>the</strong> last three figures are<br />
preserved, but <strong>the</strong> sum could not have been less than 950 drachmas and may well have<br />
been much more. Finally, in Stele VII, line 78, <strong>the</strong>re is clear reference to property <strong>at</strong><br />
Abydos, which I take to be <strong>the</strong> city <strong>of</strong> th<strong>at</strong> name on <strong>the</strong> Hellespont.<br />
VI. SLAVES<br />
With regard to slave problems in Greece, Zimmern wrote over twenty-five years<br />
ago: " <strong>the</strong> same authors are ransacked; <strong>the</strong> same evidence is marshalled; <strong>the</strong> same<br />
references and footnotes are transferred, like stale tea leaves, from one learned<br />
receptable to ano<strong>the</strong>r." 1 Our inscriptions, if preserved complete, would have shed much<br />
new light on <strong>the</strong> whole problem <strong>of</strong> slavery. But even in <strong>the</strong>ir fragmentary condition,<br />
<strong>the</strong> Agora pieces do contribute some measure <strong>of</strong> new inform<strong>at</strong>ion about prices and<br />
n<strong>at</strong>ionalities, in particular.2<br />
PRICES<br />
<strong>The</strong> average price for <strong>the</strong> twenty-five slaves whose sales prices are complete is<br />
approxim<strong>at</strong>ely 174 drachmas. One <strong>of</strong> our slaves was described as a young child<br />
(Oa<strong>at</strong>&ov) and sold for 72 drachmas, ano<strong>the</strong>r as a child (7raZS) and sold for 174 drachmas,<br />
<strong>the</strong> average fee for an adult. <strong>The</strong> average price for <strong>the</strong> five women was 178<br />
drachmas; for <strong>the</strong> seventeen men, 179 drachmas.3 <strong>The</strong> sex <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cappadocian is<br />
uncertain.<br />
102<br />
See, for example, Glotz, op. cit., pp. 299-300; and Michell, Ec. <strong>of</strong> Anc. Greece, pp. 43-44.<br />
' Solon and Croesus, London, 1928, p. 106. Quoted by W. L. Westermann in A<strong>the</strong>nian<br />
<strong>Studies</strong> Presented to W. S. Ferguson (= Harv. Stud. Class. Phil., Suppl. Vol. I, 1940), p. 452.<br />
2 <strong>The</strong> slaves listed in Stele XI have not been considered in this section because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> uncertain<br />
n<strong>at</strong>ure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> list.<br />
3 I find no basis for Andreades' st<strong>at</strong>ement (Hist. <strong>of</strong> Gr. Pub. Finance, I, p. 283) th<strong>at</strong> in <strong>the</strong><br />
fifth century <strong>the</strong> average price <strong>of</strong> women slaves was somewh<strong>at</strong> higher than th<strong>at</strong> <strong>of</strong> men. Andreades<br />
himself notes th<strong>at</strong> this was not <strong>the</strong> case <strong>at</strong> Delphi during <strong>the</strong> second century.