the attic stelai - The American School of Classical Studies at Athens

the attic stelai - The American School of Classical Studies at Athens the attic stelai - The American School of Classical Studies at Athens

29.12.2013 Views

THE ATTIC STELAI 255 IV. LIVESTOCK AND BEEHIVES For a description of the nature and habitat of animals, reference has been made to 0. Keller's standard work, Die antike Tierwelt, I and II, Leipzig, 1909, 1913; and to individual articles in Pauly-Wissowa, R.E. For the prices of animals in Greece in the fourth and third centuries B.C., the most convenient table is that of A. Segre, Circolazione monetaria e prezzi nel mondo antico, Rome, 1922, pp. 168-169. The entries for livestock in our inscriptions are found in one column of Stele VI. The prices in each case are only partially preserved; the left part of the column of the sales price is lost. Determination of the number of letter spaces occupied by the numerals of the sales prices becomes critical for establishing the price of cattle, and likewise of wine. The column in question can be seen in the photograph in Hesperia, VIII, 1939, p. 70. The present writer in Part I followed the alignment given in Meritt's text in Hesperia, VIII, pp. 72-73. This text shows the first numerals of all the sales prices of the column in vertical alignment with the exception of that in line 86 (Meritt's 37), which was shifted one space to the left although the sales tax in this line was correctly aligned. It clearly seems preferable to adopt a pattern which would yield the greatest regularity. 1. /3ovi3 (VI, 68, 69, 70). Bous is a generic word for the bovine species. In the singular, the word is used for ox or cow; in the plural it is equivalent to cattle.' In Greece, the most famous cattle came from the north, from Epirus and Thessaly,2 but Euboea and Boeotia were also cattle producers and served as a source of supply for Attica, where there was a lack of pasture land. In 329 B.C. Eudemos of Plataea had to import into Athens a thousand pair of animals to provide for construction work on the Stadium.3 In Plutarch, Solon, XXIII, 3, the price of an ox in the time of Solon is given as five drachmas. The information is said to have come from Demetrios of Phaleron. Plutarch speaks of these prices as low in comparison with contemporary prices. In 410/9 B.C., 5114 drachmas were given for a hekatomb.4 The price of one cow,5 if the 'See Buck, Dictionary, p. 152. 2 Arrian, Anab., II, 16, 6; Aristotle, H.A., III, 16; Varro, R.R., II, 5, 10. See H. Kraemer, R.E., s.v. Rind (Suppl. 7), 1166-67; and Keller, op. cit., I, pp. 332 if. 3 I.G., II2, 351, lines 18-19. Cf. Tod, Gr. Hist. Inscr., II, p. 279. 4 I.G., 12, 304 A, line 7. 5 I have assumed that since the offering was to Athena, the hekatomb would naturally consist of cows. It should be noted that A. Mommsen, Feste der Stadt Athen im Altertum, Leipzig, 1898, p. 118, note 1, does not accept this view. His references prove that male animals were at times sacrificed to female divinities, and vice versa (cf. also I.G., II2, 1358, where rams are prescribed for Achaia, Kora, and Ge). However, the hekatomb to Athena seems to have consisted of cows; see I.G., 112, 334, line 19, a decree concerning the Panathenaea: ot kpo7roto ---- GvovTOv raiTav Tag ,/oiv a7raoia3 oirt r t w/ou7h tris 'A Oqva& - - - -. Cf. I.G., 1II2, 1006, lines 14-15. This is the view of P.

256 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT hekatomb totalled 100, would be about 51 drachmas. Since the hekatomb was for the Great Panathenaea it is generally thought that it amounted to the full complement of 100 animals.6 Another hekatomb, this of 109 oxen, cost 8,419 drachmas, which would make an average of 77.14 drachmas apiece.7 In this case, it is to be noted, the price is not dependent on the interpretation of the word ' hekatomb.' 8 These animals were purchased for sacrifice at the festival of Apollo at Delos in 375/4 B.C. In 335/4 (I.G., II2, 334, line 16) a hekatomb for the lesser Panathenaea cost 4100 drachmas, which would be 41 drachmas apiece if the hekatomb consisted of 100 animals. Ziehen, however, believes the hekatomb was now of smaller number and suggests 50 animals,9 which would make each animal cost 82 drachmas. The estimate, however, has no probative value. In an Athenian sacrificial calendar, dated shortly after 403/2 B.C.,'0 two oxen are priced at 50 drachmas, but the low price may be explained by the qualifying adjective XEtu7oyvW',ucot, 'lacking the teeth which mark age.' ' In I.G., I12, 1358, a sacrificial calendar from the Attic Epakria of the period 400-350 B.C., the price of a bous is eight times given as 90 drachmas, once as 150 drachmas. Of the eight, one fee was for a pregnant cow. Since the sacrifices were to both female and male deities, the price of 90 drachmas was for a cow or ox.'2 The reading of 150 drachmas is in doubt. Moreover, the stone was subjected to erasure in the letter spaces immediately following (col. II, line 8). In the Agora inscription from 363/2 B.C., which contains a covenant between the two branches of the clan of the Salaminioi, the price to be paid for a bous is given as 70 drachmas.'3 In I.G., 12, 1672, line 290, the price of a single sacrificial bous is given as 400 drachmas. This was apparently not normal, for the demos had in this case expressly established the price (6o-ov 6 077o0 &amev). The well-known famine of the period 330-326 B.C. doubtless caused a sharp rise in prices. This figure of 400 drachmas, in any case, cannot be regarded as normal. In a sacrificial calendar from Cos, dated ca. 300 B.C., the price to be paid for a cow is given as no less than 50 drachmas.'4 In a still later sacrificial inscription, this from Olbia, the price of a cow is given as 1200, but the coin is not specified.'5 Stengel, Die griechischen Kultusaltertumer, 3rd edition, Munich, 1920, p. 153. On the sex of sacrificial animals, see also W. K. C. Guthrie, The Greeks and their Gods, Boston, 1951, p. 221. 6 See L. Ziehen, Rh. Mus., LI, 1896, p. 217. 7I.G., II2, 1635, lines 35-36. 8 For various numbers of animals in a hekatomb, see P. Stengel, R.E., s.v. TEKaro0'1u4q; also Kirchner ad Syll.3, 271, note 7; and Syll.3, 1024, line 29. 9 L. Ziehen, Leges Graecorum Sacrae, II; 1, p. 95, note 22. J. Oliver, Hesperia, IV, 1935, p. 21, lines 48-51. "Pollux, I, 182. 12 Cf. R. B. Richardson, A.J.A., X, 1895, p. 225. 3 W. S. Ferguson, Hesperia, VII, 1938, p. 5, line 86. 14 Syll.3, 1026, lines 6-7. 15 Syll.3, 1039. Ziehen (Leges Graecorum, p. 249) regards it as an obol; E. H. Minns (Scythians and Greeks, Cambridge, 1913, p. 463) as a chalkous.

256 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT<br />

hek<strong>at</strong>omb totalled 100, would be about 51 drachmas. Since <strong>the</strong> hek<strong>at</strong>omb was for <strong>the</strong><br />

Gre<strong>at</strong> Pana<strong>the</strong>naea it is generally thought th<strong>at</strong> it amounted to <strong>the</strong> full complement <strong>of</strong><br />

100 animals.6 Ano<strong>the</strong>r hek<strong>at</strong>omb, this <strong>of</strong> 109 oxen, cost 8,419 drachmas, which<br />

would make an average <strong>of</strong> 77.14 drachmas apiece.7 In this case, it is to be noted, <strong>the</strong><br />

price is not dependent on <strong>the</strong> interpret<strong>at</strong>ion <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word ' hek<strong>at</strong>omb.' 8 <strong>The</strong>se animals<br />

were purchased for sacrifice <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> festival <strong>of</strong> Apollo <strong>at</strong> Delos in 375/4 B.C. In 335/4<br />

(I.G., II2, 334, line 16) a hek<strong>at</strong>omb for <strong>the</strong> lesser Pana<strong>the</strong>naea cost 4100 drachmas,<br />

which would be 41 drachmas apiece if <strong>the</strong> hek<strong>at</strong>omb consisted <strong>of</strong> 100 animals. Ziehen,<br />

however, believes <strong>the</strong> hek<strong>at</strong>omb was now <strong>of</strong> smaller number and suggests 50 animals,9<br />

which would make each animal cost 82 drachmas. <strong>The</strong> estim<strong>at</strong>e, however, has no<br />

prob<strong>at</strong>ive value.<br />

In an A<strong>the</strong>nian sacrificial calendar, d<strong>at</strong>ed shortly after 403/2 B.C.,'0 two oxen are<br />

priced <strong>at</strong> 50 drachmas, but <strong>the</strong> low price may be explained by <strong>the</strong> qualifying adjective<br />

XEtu7oyvW',ucot, 'lacking <strong>the</strong> teeth which mark age.' ' In I.G., I12, 1358, a sacrificial<br />

calendar from <strong>the</strong> Attic Epakria <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 400-350 B.C., <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> a bous is<br />

eight times given as 90 drachmas, once as 150 drachmas. Of <strong>the</strong> eight, one fee was<br />

for a pregnant cow. Since <strong>the</strong> sacrifices were to both female and male deities, <strong>the</strong><br />

price <strong>of</strong> 90 drachmas was for a cow or ox.'2 <strong>The</strong> reading <strong>of</strong> 150 drachmas is in doubt.<br />

Moreover, <strong>the</strong> stone was subjected to erasure in <strong>the</strong> letter spaces immedi<strong>at</strong>ely following<br />

(col. II, line 8). In <strong>the</strong> Agora inscription from 363/2 B.C., which contains a covenant<br />

between <strong>the</strong> two branches <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> clan <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Salaminioi, <strong>the</strong> price to be paid for a bous<br />

is given as 70 drachmas.'3 In I.G., 12, 1672, line 290, <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> a single sacrificial<br />

bous is given as 400 drachmas. This was apparently not normal, for <strong>the</strong> demos had in<br />

this case expressly established <strong>the</strong> price (6o-ov 6 077o0 &amev). <strong>The</strong> well-known famine<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> period 330-326 B.C. doubtless caused a sharp rise in prices. This figure <strong>of</strong> 400<br />

drachmas, in any case, cannot be regarded as normal. In a sacrificial calendar from<br />

Cos, d<strong>at</strong>ed ca. 300 B.C., <strong>the</strong> price to be paid for a cow is given as no less than 50<br />

drachmas.'4 In a still l<strong>at</strong>er sacrificial inscription, this from Olbia, <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> a cow<br />

is given as 1200, but <strong>the</strong> coin is not specified.'5<br />

Stengel, Die griechischen Kultusaltertumer, 3rd edition, Munich, 1920, p. 153. On <strong>the</strong> sex <strong>of</strong><br />

sacrificial animals, see also W. K. C. Guthrie, <strong>The</strong> Greeks and <strong>the</strong>ir Gods, Boston, 1951, p. 221.<br />

6 See L. Ziehen, Rh. Mus., LI, 1896, p. 217.<br />

7I.G., II2, 1635, lines 35-36.<br />

8 For various numbers <strong>of</strong> animals in a hek<strong>at</strong>omb, see P. Stengel, R.E., s.v. TEKaro0'1u4q; also<br />

Kirchner ad Syll.3, 271, note 7; and Syll.3, 1024, line 29.<br />

9 L. Ziehen, Leges Graecorum Sacrae, II; 1, p. 95, note 22.<br />

J. Oliver, Hesperia, IV, 1935, p. 21, lines 48-51.<br />

"Pollux, I, 182.<br />

12 Cf. R. B. Richardson, A.J.A., X, 1895, p. 225.<br />

3 W. S. Ferguson, Hesperia, VII, 1938, p. 5, line 86.<br />

14<br />

Syll.3, 1026, lines 6-7.<br />

15 Syll.3, 1039. Ziehen (Leges Graecorum, p. 249) regards it as an obol; E. H. Minns<br />

(Scythians and Greeks, Cambridge, 1913, p. 463) as a chalkous.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!