29.12.2013 Views

the attic stelai - The American School of Classical Studies at Athens

the attic stelai - The American School of Classical Studies at Athens

the attic stelai - The American School of Classical Studies at Athens

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

282 W. KENDRICK PRITCHETT<br />

tegula).' <strong>The</strong>re are today various terms for this tile: ' fl<strong>at</strong> tile,' 'lower tile,' 'rain tile,'<br />

and ' pan tile.' <strong>The</strong>re were vari<strong>at</strong>ions, however, and one type has been recovered in<br />

which fl<strong>at</strong> tile and cover tile were made in one piece. For a detailed description <strong>of</strong><br />

various types <strong>of</strong> Greek tiles, see A. Andren, " Architectural Terracottas from<br />

Etrusco-Italic Temples," Skrift. Sven. Inst., VI, 1940, pp. lxxxviii if.<br />

For convenient descriptions <strong>of</strong> how ro<strong>of</strong> tiles were laid, see J. Durm, Die Baukunst<br />

der Griechen3, Leipzig, 1910, pp. 197-206 (useful for its clear sketches); E. D.<br />

Van Buren, Archaic Fictile Revetments in Sicily and Magna Gr<strong>at</strong>ecica, London, 1923,<br />

pp. xviii-xix; H. A. Thompson, Tholos <strong>of</strong> A<strong>the</strong>ns (Hesperia, Suppl. IV), 1940, pp.<br />

66-73 (for <strong>the</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tholos); and G. P. Stevens, Hesperia, XIX, 1950, pp.<br />

181-184.<br />

One modific<strong>at</strong>ion must probably be made to Bliimner's terminology. <strong>The</strong> keramis,<br />

just as <strong>the</strong> keramos, could be used for <strong>the</strong> lower tile. In Insc. De'los, 440 A, lines 79-<br />

89, keramis and kalypter are listed side by side as <strong>the</strong> tiles for various buildings in<br />

accounts d<strong>at</strong>ed between 190-180 B.C. <strong>The</strong> distinction is maintained throughout, and it<br />

seems necessary to interpret <strong>the</strong> keramis here as different from <strong>the</strong> kalypter, and hence<br />

as <strong>the</strong> lower tile.<br />

PRICES. Rel<strong>at</strong>ively full inform<strong>at</strong>ion is available for <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> ro<strong>of</strong> tiles from<br />

Delos in <strong>the</strong> third century B.C. It is much less complete for o<strong>the</strong>r places. <strong>The</strong> table<br />

below gives in graphic form such prices as are known to me from epigraphical sources.<br />

<strong>The</strong> figures from Delos are based in part on those <strong>of</strong> Glotz and Larsen.4 It is to be<br />

noted th<strong>at</strong> prices were considerably higher in <strong>the</strong> fourth century than in <strong>the</strong> fifth and<br />

by 246 B.C. had fallen to about one-half <strong>of</strong> wh<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong>y had been.5<br />

For prices in Economic Survey, o<strong>the</strong>r than those from Delos, I have noted only<br />

one quot<strong>at</strong>ion from Ephesos in Asia Minor (Vol. IV, p. 838) where 300 ro<strong>of</strong> tiles<br />

cost 50 drachmas. Finally, it may be <strong>of</strong> interest to note th<strong>at</strong> we know th<strong>at</strong> one man<br />

3 I. Thallon-Hill and L. S. King (Corinth, Vol. IV, part 1, Decor<strong>at</strong>ed Architectural Terracottas,<br />

Cambridge, 1929, p. 39) call <strong>the</strong> fl<strong>at</strong> tiles by <strong>the</strong> term qyEoOves, a word which is applied to tiles only<br />

in inscriptions. In I.G., II2, 1627, lines 303 and 305, hegernones is modified by leontokephaloi, 'lionheaded';<br />

<strong>the</strong>y seem to have been <strong>the</strong> lowest row <strong>of</strong> pan tiles turned up to form a sima and accordingly<br />

provided with lion heads. Cf. I.G., IV2, 102, line 100, where <strong>the</strong> word is coupled with paraietis.<br />

See, also, Robinson, Olynthus, XII, p. 466; and H. L<strong>at</strong>termann, Griechische Bauinschriften, Strassburg,<br />

1908, p. 34. In <strong>the</strong> Eleusis inscriptions <strong>the</strong> front tile <strong>of</strong> each row <strong>of</strong> convex tiles was called<br />

<strong>the</strong> 'hegemon with flower p<strong>at</strong>terns.' See K. A. Rhomaios, Kepa'ou ris KaXv8&vos, A<strong>the</strong>ns, 1951, pp.<br />

24 ff. This hegemon, or eaves cover tile with antefix, is described with illustr<strong>at</strong>ions by F. Noack,<br />

Eleusis, Berlin and Leipzig, 1927, pp. 66-68. In ei<strong>the</strong>r case, <strong>the</strong> hegemon tile belongs <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> edge <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> ro<strong>of</strong>.<br />

4 G. Glotz, Journal des Savants, XI, 1913, p. 19; and J. A. 0. Larsen, "Roman Greece,"<br />

Economic Survey, IV, pp. 397-398. See also Larsen, " <strong>The</strong> Price <strong>of</strong> Tiles <strong>at</strong> Delos from 210 to<br />

180 B.C.," Class. Phil., XXXVI, 1941, pp. 156-166.<br />

r See Larsen, Economic Survey, IV, pp. 397-398.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!