T H E S I S
T H E S I S T H E S I S
k2 According to H.T.Moore they objected to a passage of suggested lesbianism between Winifred and Ursula, from the chapter "Shame*1: “Ursula lay still in her mistress’s arms, her forehead a- gainst the beloved, maddening breast. *1 shall put you in,' said Winifred. But Ursula twined her body about her mistress." (TUB 3**0) There were many other objections to love scenes between Ursula and Skrebensky or Anna and Tom. The charge was obscenity. Critics1 opinions were stamped in the newspapers in big headlines like these: »Obscene Novel to be Destroyed. - Worse than Zola.” - (The Daily Express - PGB 172) nA Monstrous Wilderness of Phallic ism.” - (Robert Lynd, in The Dally News - TIH 25V) Even the first publisher, Methuen, became opposed to Lawrence in court and said that The Rainbow was ".,. an orgy of sexiness that omitted no form of viciousness, of suggestiveness." (TIH 25V) Th8 Rainbow was finally prosecuted in London in 1915» completely suppressed and more than 1*000 copies were ordered to be destroyed, "under Lord Campbell’s Obscene Publications Act; this dated from 185?.*' (TIH 260) What was it that labelled this novel as "indecent“ and stigmatized the author as "obscene"? It was the first novel in English Literature where sex was a central idea, and that was enoughjBut not really because of Mobscenity”; the real reason - was "a confusion of mind, aggravated possibly by the hysteria due to war conditions"(TIH 258), and it was said that the novel hampered the recruiting efforts of the government, simply because Ursula made fun of her best boy, saying: "I hate soldiers, they are stiff and wooden."(TIH 259)
^3 Lawrence said in his defence: "There is no more indecency or impropriety in The Rainbow than there is in this autumn morning - I who say so ought to know. And when I open my mouth let no dog bark.“ (FRL 1^5) This novel unfolds the story of three generations of a Midland family, the Brangwens. Lawrence tried to build up a study of his own beliefs in marriage based on the union of the sexes to attain an accomplished life for man and woman, Tom Brang- wen marries a Polish widow, Anna Lensky, and discovers that love must come to terms with the other forces that make up a human personality, including sex. But Ursula (Anna's grand-daughter) and Skrebensky form the couple(in the third generation) who are really striving for fulfilment in the sexual relations. The Rainbow is the least autobiographical of Lawrence’s novels and only Ursula bears something approaching an autobiographical relation to Lawrence^ according to F.R.Leavis«(FRL 137) In this novel Lawrence began to “preach" his doctrine of sex which became the cornerstone of most of his writings, especially in his last period, the critical essays and Lady Chatterley’s Lover: the supreme importance of fulfilment in the individual and a faith that the sexual fulfilment is the ultimate. Women in Love is a sequel to The Rainbow and grew out of the second part of the first draft of The Sisters« The final draft was written in 1916, but (because of The Rainbow’s fate) the publication took place only in 1920, in New York; it was published in England in 1921« Women in Love is the story of two sisters, their lives, their lovers, and the emotional conflicts they face because of the necessity for sexual fulfilment. Ursula (the same character
- Page 1 and 2: Mo ï»e THESIS D. H0 IAWBENGE: SEX
- Page 3 and 4: Esta Tese foi julgada adequada para
- Page 5 and 6: TABLE OF CONTENTS Abbreviations Mbs
- Page 7 and 8: vil PGB - Portrait of a Genius« Bu
- Page 9 and 10: R E S U M O D« H. Lawrence fez do
- Page 11 and 12: Chapter I INTRODUCTION A, A, Victor
- Page 13 and 14: 3 misunderstood sexual theme, is go
- Page 15 and 16: 5 identical reasoning: nThere can s
- Page 17 and 18: 7 attitudes. In this respect, it is
- Page 19 and 20: 9 rence ’s works in his book The
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter II PURITANISM DEFINED Histo
- Page 23 and 24: 33 The actual meaning we find in di
- Page 25 and 26: 15 and lie alone right. Having run
- Page 27 and 28: 17 presents the Freudian imbroglio
- Page 29 and 30: 19 it is perhaps worth noticing tha
- Page 31 and 32: 21 but in many other parts of the b
- Page 33 and 34: or inhibited action we are tempted
- Page 35 and 36: 25 And about Cyril (himself) he sai
- Page 37 and 38: 27 The tall meadow-sweet was in bud
- Page 39 and 40: 29 genitals. Certainly Lawrence's p
- Page 41 and 42: 31 Of course, one can imagine how i
- Page 43 and 44: 33 'Good Lord, Emily! But he is dea
- Page 45 and 46: 35 cock just quoted in the two prev
- Page 47 and 48: 37 frustrated: Mr, and Mrs. Beardsa
- Page 49 and 50: 39 So far, Lawrence’s early views
- Page 51: hi rainbow arch; it is the “toget
- Page 55 and 56: ubbing passage of The White Peacock
- Page 57 and 58: eautiful."(TRB 238) Why afraid? Bec
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter V LAURENCE AND PORNOGRAPHY
- Page 61 and 62: 51 sions then is Freud’s theory o
- Page 63 and 64: 53 male, in a negative or sundering
- Page 65 and 66: 55 he directly faced the censors an
- Page 67 and 68: 57 "the whole question of pornograp
- Page 69 and 70: 59 Girordias, (11) famous editor an
- Page 71 and 72: 61 secret".; Neither can be of any
- Page 73 and 74: 63 by January 1928 and is now widel
- Page 75 and 76: 65 So the general subject matter of
- Page 77 and 78: 67 The real theme, which recurs in
- Page 79 and 80: 69 built of rusticated sandstone an
- Page 81 and 82: 71 who want to dominate them, Mello
- Page 83 and 84: 73 question Lawrence puts to himsel
- Page 85 and 86: 75 the mechanical images are deflec
- Page 87 and 88: 77 lies, navels, and breasts* (It h
- Page 89 and 90: 79 Maybe they are the truth some cr
- Page 91 and 92: 81 heave her loins, and throw the m
- Page 93 and 94: 83 ’'darkness” is present in M
- Page 95 and 96: 85 11ty shook her to her foundation
- Page 97 and 98: 87 some kind of ’'arrest'** In al
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter ¥11 CONCLUSIONS Host of th
- Page 101 and 102: 91 in a passionate love affair and
k2<br />
According to H.T.Moore they objected to a passage of suggested<br />
lesbianism between Winifred and Ursula, from the chapter<br />
"Shame*1:<br />
“Ursula lay still in her mistress’s arms, her forehead a-<br />
gainst the beloved, maddening breast.<br />
*1 shall put you in,' said Winifred.<br />
But Ursula twined her body about her mistress." (TUB 3**0)<br />
There were many other objections to love scenes between Ursula<br />
and Skrebensky or Anna and Tom. The charge was obscenity. Critics1<br />
opinions were stamped in the newspapers in big headlines<br />
like these:<br />
»Obscene Novel to be Destroyed. -<br />
Worse than Zola.” - (The Daily Express - PGB 172)<br />
nA Monstrous Wilderness of Phallic ism.” - (Robert Lynd, in<br />
The Dally News - TIH 25V)<br />
Even the first publisher, Methuen, became opposed to Lawrence in<br />
court and said that The Rainbow was ".,. an orgy of sexiness that<br />
omitted no form of viciousness, of suggestiveness." (TIH 25V)<br />
Th8 Rainbow was finally prosecuted in London in 1915» completely<br />
suppressed and more than 1*000 copies were ordered to be<br />
destroyed, "under Lord Campbell’s Obscene Publications Act; this<br />
dated from 185?.*' (TIH 260) What was it that labelled this novel<br />
as "indecent“ and stigmatized the author as "obscene"? It was<br />
the first novel in English Literature where sex was a central<br />
idea, and that was enoughjBut not really because of Mobscenity”;<br />
the real reason - was "a confusion of mind, aggravated possibly<br />
by the hysteria due to war conditions"(TIH 258), and it was said<br />
that the novel hampered the recruiting efforts of the government,<br />
simply because Ursula made fun of her best boy, saying: "I hate<br />
soldiers, they are stiff and wooden."(TIH 259)
Change language