T H E S I S

T H E S I S T H E S I S

repositorio.ufsc.br
from repositorio.ufsc.br More from this publisher
29.12.2013 Views

9h idea of blutbrUderschaft plays an important role, (exactly as it did in his private life) but I think it is of secondary importance, f* in the transference of the part played by the genital organs to other organs or different areas of the body. Through all his novels we find many passages of sado-masochistic flavour, in The White Peacock, for example, as I noted on pages 32-33* These systematic observations, based on a literary criticism which holds it impossible to separate Lawrence the writer from Lawrence the man, must be joined to the idea that the author has changed between The White Peacock and Lady Chatterley’s Lover«, although traces of his “polymorphously perverse disposition'* remain in the latter. From this Freudian point of view, Lawrence *s sexuality is somewhat perverse in its development, but that is to say it is '‘normally" neurotic, as Freud himself would say«' As artist, Lawrence overcomes this difficulty through sublimation® But since the negative of perversion is neurosis, again according to Freud, and Lawrence is not a complete neurotic, he must really be a gifted artist, for the gifted artist is the result of a balanced combination of efficiency, perversion, and neurosis. Certainly Lawrence’s deviation from normal sexuality was mainly due to the long mother-“son love-attachment. Because of -this there is an incompleteness in his sex doctrine» Certainly he is almost always positively emphasizing his “perversions'*, but he says very little about the instinct of procreation, the final biological reason for sex» R.Aldington regards Lawrence’s changes and phases as re­

95 presentative of most people's experiences: "At forty Lawrence in many ways was much the same kind of person he had been at twenty,»" (PGB 1+6) I think that the late Lawrence of Lady Chatterley's Lover r—»■! i»niVm«Hi —........ iiiiiiw........... is far from the Lawrence of The White Peacock^ but not too far« He has never mastered his "polymorphously perverse" circumstances completely, but he is capable of mature sexual behaviour. He has riever abandoned the theme of sex as a motive in human conduct, but in Lady Chatterley's Lover there is a definite change in his view of sex, which is not to be seen with horror any more, but with sincerity and opening« Little by little5 in his philosophical maturity, D.H*Lawrence is bitterly giving up his projects and ideals. He does not strive for blutbrtlderschaft any longer; he understands that friendship between man and man is impossible. His ideals of education, leadership, and politics are dropped because of their impracticability« "Rananim", his utopian colony of friendship, freedom, and.happiness is slowly evanescing in the distant and lost horizon of M s complex existence. His marriage with Frieda is not that example of harmony and comprehension it was in the beginning. .He cannot wake up his England from the mortal sleep of industrial« ism and the mechanical mind. Frieda says that the First World Mar had already cracked his beliefs in the prospects of human civilization. But Lawrence has never given up his doctrine whose principal stated motive (more than procreative) is creative and religious, and its second motive is sex. Nevertheless, it seems to me that the first motive in Lady Chatterley's Lover is really sex.

95<br />

presentative of most people's experiences:<br />

"At forty Lawrence in many ways was much the same kind of<br />

person he had been at twenty,»" (PGB 1+6)<br />

I think that the late Lawrence of Lady Chatterley's Lover<br />

r—»■! i»niVm«Hi —........ iiiiiiw...........<br />

is far from the Lawrence of The White Peacock^ but not too far«<br />

He has never mastered his "polymorphously perverse" circumstances<br />

completely, but he is capable of mature sexual behaviour. He has<br />

riever abandoned the theme of sex as a motive in human conduct,<br />

but in Lady Chatterley's Lover there is a definite change in his<br />

view of sex, which is not to be seen with horror any more, but<br />

with sincerity and opening«<br />

Little by little5 in his philosophical maturity, D.H*Lawrence<br />

is bitterly giving up his projects and ideals. He does not<br />

strive for blutbrtlderschaft any longer; he understands that friendship<br />

between man and man is impossible. His ideals of education,<br />

leadership, and politics are dropped because of their impracticability«<br />

"Rananim", his utopian colony of friendship, freedom,<br />

and.happiness is slowly evanescing in the distant and lost horizon<br />

of M s complex existence. His marriage with Frieda is not<br />

that example of harmony and comprehension it was in the beginning.<br />

.He cannot wake up his England from the mortal sleep of industrial«<br />

ism and the mechanical mind. Frieda says that the First World Mar<br />

had already cracked his beliefs in the prospects of human civilization.<br />

But Lawrence has never given up his doctrine whose principal<br />

stated motive (more than procreative) is creative and religious,<br />

and its second motive is sex. Nevertheless, it seems to<br />

me that the first motive in Lady Chatterley's Lover is really sex.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!