T H E S I S
T H E S I S
T H E S I S
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
9h<br />
idea of blutbrUderschaft plays an important role, (exactly as it<br />
did in his private life) but I think it is of secondary importance,<br />
f* in the transference of the part played by the genital<br />
organs to other organs or different areas of the body. Through<br />
all his novels we find many passages of sado-masochistic flavour,<br />
in The White Peacock, for example, as I noted on pages 32-33*<br />
These systematic observations, based on a literary criticism<br />
which holds it impossible to separate Lawrence the writer from<br />
Lawrence the man, must be joined to the idea that the author has<br />
changed between The White Peacock and Lady Chatterley’s Lover«,<br />
although traces of his “polymorphously perverse disposition'* remain<br />
in the latter.<br />
From this Freudian point of view, Lawrence *s sexuality is<br />
somewhat perverse in its development, but that is to say it is<br />
'‘normally" neurotic, as Freud himself would say«' As artist, Lawrence<br />
overcomes this difficulty through sublimation® But since<br />
the negative of perversion is neurosis, again according to Freud,<br />
and Lawrence is not a complete neurotic, he must really be a gifted<br />
artist, for the gifted artist is the result of a balanced combination<br />
of efficiency, perversion, and neurosis.<br />
Certainly Lawrence’s deviation from normal sexuality was<br />
mainly due to the long mother-“son love-attachment. Because of<br />
-this there is an incompleteness in his sex doctrine» Certainly<br />
he is almost always positively emphasizing his “perversions'*, but<br />
he says very little about the instinct of procreation, the final<br />
biological reason for sex»<br />
R.Aldington regards Lawrence’s changes and phases as re