T H E S I S

T H E S I S T H E S I S

repositorio.ufsc.br
from repositorio.ufsc.br More from this publisher
29.12.2013 Views

90 characters are striving for sexual fulfilment» This is true regarding Lawrence’s own representative, the natural hero Mellors, the "phallus-bearer". It would be better if the secret of sex remained a mystery, but mystery and secrecy are puritanical byproducts of the dirty idea of sex, and Lawrence is, paradoxically, an anti-puritan reformer in this respect, because he wants to end the secrecy. Two reasons prevent Lawrence from entering wholly in the mystery of the nphallic consciousness11«, One is moral and the ether is physical« The first one is his unconscious puritanism that persecutes him from The White Peacock period to his last days« Struggling with his deeply-rooted conservatism in the field of morality, he arrives at a peculiar paradox. Besides the leader and the prophet, Lawrence as a preacher is an anti-puritanical puritan, While he condemns the "grey puritans", he is a puritan himself, not only because he cannot escape from his background, but also because in his doctrine he preaches the "purification5* of every human activity through a puritanic honesty, mentally and materially. In Lady Ghatterlev{s Lover he^still the puritanical author of The White Peacock, Indeed, it is very paradoxical that a puritan becomes a preacher for sexual freedom. Undoubtedly it is because he came to understand the wrong side of puritanism in The White Peacock period« R,Aidington, having been his acquaintance, is the best biographer to talk about Lawrence*s strangeness of spirit and his controversial nature, in the light of Lady Chatterley*s Lovers "Even Lady Chatterley*s Loverf so desperate an attempt of his conscious mind to fly from his unconscious puritanism, is lowered by the fact that it was written less for delight

91 in a passionate love affair and joy of a woman's body than as a kind of erotic lesson, a sermon on sex. Clearly, it was a case of *sex in the head1, from every point of view, (such as he was always denouncing in others), since there is every reason to suppose that when he wrote the book he was already virtually if not completely impotent,5'1 (PGB 317) Here is the second reason, the physical one« "Lawrence has been impotent since 1926!" Frieda Lawrence confirmed it to H.T, Moore» (T1H k-7?) So, when Lawrence was writing his "phallic novel" he was already a dying man, because according to his doctors his tuberculosis could not be cured* Certainly his impotence was due to the illness* The phallus itself is used symbolically by the author of Lady Chatterley?s Loverf since in physical fact it was drooping. Here lies all the tragedy! Here lies the "mystery of the phallus" that Lawrence could not understand any moreJ Coming from an impotent man, the expression “the root of sanity is in the balls’* (LCL 227) would seem farcical« But it proves this man's conviction in sexual fulfilment as a remedy for the rottenness of the mechanical civilization. Together with his motto "Blood is basic!" these assertions represent the cornerstone of his doctrine of the primacy of the body over the in tel*» lect. Ladv Chatterley's Lover contains the real proofs of how deeply-rooted sex is in his head® The gamekeeper Mellors, despite his tenderness and his tentative "phallic consciousness", so glorifies the acts of sex that he is a clear example of the "sex in the head" which Lawrence abominated. Even Connie has more of "sex consciousness" than of "phallic consciousness". After she meets Mellors and his "sheer sensuality" she cannot renounce sex any more.

91<br />

in a passionate love affair and joy of a woman's body than<br />

as a kind of erotic lesson, a sermon on sex. Clearly, it<br />

was a case of *sex in the head1, from every point of view,<br />

(such as he was always denouncing in others), since there<br />

is every reason to suppose that when he wrote the book he<br />

was already virtually if not completely impotent,5'1 (PGB 317)<br />

Here is the second reason, the physical one« "Lawrence has<br />

been impotent since 1926!" Frieda Lawrence confirmed it to H.T,<br />

Moore» (T1H k-7?) So, when Lawrence was writing his "phallic novel"<br />

he was already a dying man, because according to his doctors<br />

his tuberculosis could not be cured* Certainly his impotence was<br />

due to the illness* The phallus itself is used symbolically by<br />

the author of Lady Chatterley?s Loverf since in physical fact it<br />

was drooping. Here lies all the tragedy! Here lies the "mystery<br />

of the phallus" that Lawrence could not understand any moreJ<br />

Coming from an impotent man, the expression “the root of<br />

sanity is in the balls’* (LCL 227) would seem farcical« But it<br />

proves this man's conviction in sexual fulfilment as a remedy for<br />

the rottenness of the mechanical civilization. Together with his<br />

motto "Blood is basic!" these assertions represent the cornerstone<br />

of his doctrine of the primacy of the body over the in tel*»<br />

lect. Ladv Chatterley's Lover contains the real proofs of how<br />

deeply-rooted sex is in his head® The gamekeeper Mellors, despite<br />

his tenderness and his tentative "phallic consciousness", so glorifies<br />

the acts of sex that he is a clear example of the "sex in<br />

the head" which Lawrence abominated. Even Connie has more of<br />

"sex consciousness" than of "phallic consciousness". After she<br />

meets Mellors and his "sheer sensuality" she cannot renounce sex<br />

any more.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!