RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE
RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE
started crying may be seen as a way she found to blame both men for her recently taken decision. Ramon is forced to leave the room because Cipriano seems to have perceived Kate's joke: "Then Cipriano's voice said, with a hot softness of persuasion: 'You are not his! He would not tell you'" (p.487). Ramon goes away and Kate suddenly stops crying. She has not any reason to cry anymore because Ramon is not present in the room. Her alternative is now to plead with her husband not to let her go away. The last page of the book is then transformed into a mess of language devices to imply Cipriano's mesmeric strength. He uses (and abuses) his snake-like voice to make Kate stay. It seems that in doing so he is putting Kate to sleep (perhaps the sense of Cipriano's mesmeric voice has the same connotation of Henry's soft, manipulative voice when he was hunting March): "Then came his soft-tongued Indian speech, as if all his mouth were soft, saying in Spanish, but with the 'r' sound almost lost... [his voice] £ounded so soft, so £oft-tongued, of the £oft, wet, hot blood, that she shivered a little" (ibid - My underlining). The use of so many alliterations allows us to see Cipriano as a snake mesmerizing his prey. Kate is the prey, of course. However, in her first speech as well as in her last, Kate uses negative statements which positively express her continuous doubt. The point is perhaps that here Lawrence's indecisiveness may represent a double standard: he wants her to stay, but he does not want to commit himself in the decision and, in letting her speak, he wants her to decide to stay. When Kate says "'You won't let me go!'"she does not imply she has already taken the decision. The discussion will go on indefinitely. But, in this novel, the very fact of the two men together at the end of the story marks Lawrence's thumb in the scale pressing heavily on
37-4 the masculine side. Also, another idea must be presented to defend Kate: Lawrence, even wishing to make her submit, has put into her mind the thought that she could fool both men and because of this Lawrence has not attained his purpose of putting the woman at the feet of men. If he lets her have this thought he implies that Kate is still spiritually strong and not the passive female he has tried to make her appear. However, Kate's character is inferior to Ursula's because Kate is seen as strong ■mostly in her mind, whereas Ursula defends her points of view even though she knows she is going to fight her husband off. Kate is strong internally, but Lawrence makes her weaker in terms of making her depend on the two men. Ursula has never been a puppet in Lawrence's hands but it seems that Kate is. Among these three fictions the one which seems more 'balanced' in terms of the couples is Women in Love because Ursula and Birkin, as I already pointed out, up to the end of the novel, are still defending their different points of view. The other two stories may be seen as theory and practice: Henry wants to dominate March, but he cannot, thus Cipriano dominates Kate (at least sexually). But the idea of a perfect communion between man and woman is still absent. It is as if Lawrence could not portray this and the more he tried, the less he could even convince himself of his intentions. Lawrence's endings seem always a problem. What is really the sense of his endings? To answer this question one must examine the intention of any ending. The end of a story may be intended to teach a moral lesson. This possibility I discard because Lawrence himself said that this is immoral. His stories end almost always in an ambiguous way due to the author's conflict between intention vs feeling. What does this prove? His
- Page 331 and 332: 322 other kind of intimacy save for
- Page 333 and 334: 324 But perhaps he would be, if we
- Page 335 and 336: 326 general. And furthermore, if Ka
- Page 337 and 338: 328 black hair, which he wore rathe
- Page 339 and 340: 330 himself, his nakedness, his min
- Page 341 and 342: 332 is no beyond" and where only me
- Page 343 and 344: :334 thing. She resented being made
- Page 345 and 346: 336 because he really is an author
- Page 347 and 348: 338 strong element is the meeting b
- Page 349 and 350: 340 novelist, deals with people in
- Page 351 and 352: 342 fit his own personality. More m
- Page 353 and 354: 344 novella analysed in this disser
- Page 355 and 356: 346 to that fatal place. Another fa
- Page 357 and 358: 348 Byrne's last speech implies tha
- Page 359 and 360: 350 There is a basic hostility in a
- Page 361 and 362: 352 him. The turning to the city al
- Page 363 and 364: 35 4- being. In fourth place comes
- Page 365 and 366: 356 Although it may seem strange to
- Page 367 and 368: "358- following novels. Women in Lo
- Page 369 and 370: 360 The very end of the novel shows
- Page 371 and 372: 262 in the end of Women in Love ill
- Page 373 and 374: 564 that she wants a balanced relat
- Page 375 and 376: 366 wanted her to give herself with
- Page 377 and 378: 368 he can do no more in his own vo
- Page 379 and 380: 370 the conclusion that in Mexico t
- Page 381: 37-2- don't'". Her reply to this do
- Page 385 and 386: 376 Ursula, in a rejected fragment
- Page 387 and 388: 37.8 a personality to compete with
- Page 389 and 390: 380 the one which shows the most su
- Page 391 and 392: stories show his internal conflict
- Page 393 and 394: 384 perfect union in human beings
- Page 395 and 396: 386 Lawrence, D.H. Sons and Lovers,
started crying may be seen as a way she found to blame both men<br />
for her recently taken decision.<br />
Ramon is forced to leave the<br />
room because Cipriano seems to have perceived Kate's joke: "Then<br />
Cipriano's voice said, with a hot softness of persuasion: 'You<br />
are not his! He would not tell you'" (p.487). Ramon goes away<br />
and Kate suddenly stops crying.<br />
She has not any reason to cry<br />
anymore because Ramon is not present in the room.<br />
Her alternative<br />
is now to plead with her husband not to let her go away. The last<br />
page of the book is then transformed into a mess of language<br />
devices to imply Cipriano's mesmeric strength.<br />
He uses (and<br />
abuses) his snake-like voice to make Kate stay. It seems that<br />
in doing so he is putting Kate to sleep (perhaps the sense of<br />
Cipriano's mesmeric voice has the same connotation of Henry's<br />
soft, manipulative voice when he was hunting March): "Then came<br />
his soft-tongued Indian speech, as if all his mouth were soft,<br />
saying in Spanish, but with the 'r' sound almost lost... [his<br />
voice] £ounded so soft, so £oft-tongued, of the £oft, wet, hot<br />
blood, that she shivered a little" (ibid - My underlining).<br />
The<br />
use of so many alliterations allows us to see Cipriano as a<br />
snake mesmerizing his prey.<br />
Kate is the prey, of course.<br />
However, in her first speech as well as in her last, Kate uses<br />
negative statements which positively express her continuous<br />
doubt.<br />
The point is perhaps that here Lawrence's indecisiveness<br />
may represent a double standard: he wants her to stay, but he<br />
does not want to commit himself in the decision and, in letting<br />
her speak, he wants her to decide to stay.<br />
When Kate says "'You<br />
won't let me go!'"she does not imply she has already taken the<br />
decision. The discussion will go on indefinitely. But, in this<br />
novel, the very fact of the two men together at the end of the<br />
story marks Lawrence's thumb in the scale pressing heavily on