RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE
RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE
341 for Tom and Lydia in The Rainbow who attain a certain balance, but even this achievement, we see, is not permanent,. since Tom dies early in the novel implying that the other couples must continue the search. Other novels show the struggle between the couples but no one can really say that they get 'there1. The couples would rather fight for dominance in the relation. This idea, I believe, proves that the author's feelings are different from his didactic intentions. Another of Lawrence's 'intentions' refers to his idea that man and woman form 'the ideal pair'. In "Morality and the Novel" he claims that The great relationship, for humanity, will always be the relation between man and woman. The relation:-between man and man, woman and woman, parent and child, will always be subsidiary. And the relation between man and woman will change for ever, and will for ever be the new central clue to human life. It is the relation itself which is the quick and the central clue to life, not man, nor the woman, nor the children that result from the relationship, as a contingency (Beal, p.113). How can it be that some of his novels try to put the relation between man and man in first plan and man and woman become secondary? One may just take a look at Women in Love which starts to present the man-to-man relationship as additional to marriage; or at The Plumed Serpent where this relation becomes the alternative to marriage. In other words, the man-to-woman relation is no longer important. Again theory and practice do not match. I do not want to claim that Lawrence is right or wrong: I say that he, like all human beings, is contradictory. We say we do what we think, but who guarantees the truth of this statement? "Never trust the artist. Trust the tale"! Lawrence probably never thought how much his statement could perfectly
342 fit his own personality. More must be said about Lawrence's 'intentions' because they reflect what he is, or what he is not. In the just quoted essay his ideas about morality contradict his authoritarian attitudes when he wrote The Plumed Serpent. Lawrence argues that Morality in the novel is the trembling instability of the balance. When the novelist puts his thumb in the scale, to pull down the balance to his own predilection, that is immorality... The novel is not, as a rule, immoral because the novelist has any dominant -idea, or purpose. The immorality lies in the novelist's helpless, unconscious predilection... If the novelist puts his thumb in the pan, for love, tenderness, sweetness, peace, then he commits an immoral act: he prevents the possibility of a pure relationship, a pure relatedness, the only thing that matters: and he makes inevitable the horrible reaction, when he lets his thumb go, towards hate and brutality, cruelty and destruction (Beal, p.1 1 0 ).2 I conclude that when Lawrence tried to 'force' the woman in Kate to fall at the feet of the man in little Cipriano, he simply imposed his own 'unconscious predilection' for the man as the master of the woman. He pressed his thumb down hard in the scale. Indeed this is 'immoral', by his own definition. Also in the predilection for a man-to-man relationship between Ramon and Cipriano, Lawrence was forcing the balance of the scale, mainly because he put into Kate's mind the sense that she as a woman was inferior to men and that they (men) form the 'ideal' pair. But Lawrence, although pressing his thumb heavily in the scale, could not help feeling ill with his own 'intentions'. That is one reason why he became so ill after completing the novel. He may have felt he was forcing a theory he could not The interesting thing about "Morality and the Novel" and The Plumed Serpent is that the essay was first published in December, 1925 and the novel in January, 1926, only a month after the publishing of the essay! Probably Lawrence wrote both the essay and the novel at the same time.
- Page 299 and 300: 290 masculine identification. She w
- Page 301 and 302: 292 and chiffon dresses. The Banfor
- Page 303 and 304: 294 From this point on, March has f
- Page 305 and 306: 296 to March. With Henry she will h
- Page 307 and 308: 298 and once more the answer goes b
- Page 309 and 310: 300 She looked up at him with tears
- Page 311 and 312: CHAPTER V THE PLUMED SERPENT - THE
- Page 313 and 314: 304 relations that Lawrence seems d
- Page 315 and 316: 306 man. But in The Plumed Serpent
- Page 317 and 318: 308 this fate implies punishment be
- Page 319 and 320: 310 and his sensuality and this see
- Page 321 and 322: 312 Ramon cannot be compared to Wal
- Page 323 and 324: 314 Carlota. The fact that Ramon wa
- Page 325 and 326: 316 devote special attention: the o
- Page 327 and 328: i 318 ... when she remembered [Cipr
- Page 329 and 330: 320 my soul. Let me close my prying
- Page 331 and 332: 322 other kind of intimacy save for
- Page 333 and 334: 324 But perhaps he would be, if we
- Page 335 and 336: 326 general. And furthermore, if Ka
- Page 337 and 338: 328 black hair, which he wore rathe
- Page 339 and 340: 330 himself, his nakedness, his min
- Page 341 and 342: 332 is no beyond" and where only me
- Page 343 and 344: :334 thing. She resented being made
- Page 345 and 346: 336 because he really is an author
- Page 347 and 348: 338 strong element is the meeting b
- Page 349: 340 novelist, deals with people in
- Page 353 and 354: 344 novella analysed in this disser
- Page 355 and 356: 346 to that fatal place. Another fa
- Page 357 and 358: 348 Byrne's last speech implies tha
- Page 359 and 360: 350 There is a basic hostility in a
- Page 361 and 362: 352 him. The turning to the city al
- Page 363 and 364: 35 4- being. In fourth place comes
- Page 365 and 366: 356 Although it may seem strange to
- Page 367 and 368: "358- following novels. Women in Lo
- Page 369 and 370: 360 The very end of the novel shows
- Page 371 and 372: 262 in the end of Women in Love ill
- Page 373 and 374: 564 that she wants a balanced relat
- Page 375 and 376: 366 wanted her to give herself with
- Page 377 and 378: 368 he can do no more in his own vo
- Page 379 and 380: 370 the conclusion that in Mexico t
- Page 381 and 382: 37-2- don't'". Her reply to this do
- Page 383 and 384: 37-4 the masculine side. Also, anot
- Page 385 and 386: 376 Ursula, in a rejected fragment
- Page 387 and 388: 37.8 a personality to compete with
- Page 389 and 390: 380 the one which shows the most su
- Page 391 and 392: stories show his internal conflict
- Page 393 and 394: 384 perfect union in human beings
- Page 395 and 396: 386 Lawrence, D.H. Sons and Lovers,
342<br />
fit his own personality.<br />
More must be said about Lawrence's 'intentions' because<br />
they reflect what he is, or what he is not. In the just quoted<br />
essay his ideas about morality contradict his authoritarian<br />
attitudes when he wrote The Plumed Serpent.<br />
Lawrence argues that<br />
Morality in the novel is the trembling instability<br />
of the balance. When the novelist puts his thumb in<br />
the scale, to pull down the balance to his own<br />
predilection, that is immorality...<br />
The novel is not, as a rule, immoral because<br />
the novelist has any dominant -idea, or purpose.<br />
The immorality lies in the novelist's helpless,<br />
unconscious predilection... If the novelist puts<br />
his thumb in the pan, for love, tenderness, sweetness,<br />
peace, then he commits an immoral act: he prevents<br />
the possibility of a pure relationship, a pure<br />
relatedness, the only thing that matters: and he<br />
makes inevitable the horrible reaction, when he<br />
lets his thumb go, towards hate and brutality,<br />
cruelty and destruction (Beal, p.1 1 0 ).2<br />
I conclude that when Lawrence tried to 'force' the woman in Kate<br />
to fall at the feet of the man in little Cipriano, he simply<br />
imposed his own 'unconscious predilection' for the man as the<br />
master of the woman.<br />
He pressed his thumb down hard in the<br />
scale. Indeed this is 'immoral', by his own definition. Also<br />
in the predilection for a man-to-man relationship between Ramon<br />
and Cipriano, Lawrence was forcing the balance of the scale,<br />
mainly because he put into Kate's mind the sense that she as a<br />
woman was inferior to men and that they (men) form the 'ideal'<br />
pair.<br />
But Lawrence, although pressing his thumb heavily in the<br />
scale, could not help feeling ill with his own 'intentions'.<br />
That is one reason why he became so ill after completing the<br />
novel.<br />
He may have felt he was forcing a theory he could not<br />
The interesting thing about "Morality and the Novel" and The<br />
Plumed Serpent is that the essay was first published in<br />
December, 1925 and the novel in January, 1926, only a month<br />
after the publishing of the essay! Probably Lawrence wrote both<br />
the essay and the novel at the same time.