RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE
RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE
243 dangerous helplessness, as if she were helplessly weighted, and unreleased" (ibid). Gerald and Birkin apparently fail to see the ambiguity in the dancers' behaviour: Gerald was excited by the desperate cleaving of Gudrun to Naomi. The essence of that female, subterranean recklessness and mockery penetrated his blood. He could not forget Gudrun's lifted, offered, cleaving reckless, yet withal mocking weight. And Birkin, watching like a hermit crab from its hole, had seen the brilliant frustration and helplessness of Ursula. She was rich, full of dangerous power. She was like a strange unconscious bud of powerful womanhood. He was unconsciously drawn to her. She was his future (pp.84-5). This long passage plus Hermione's observation deserves careful comment. The first point relates to Hermione's perspicacity in seeing Gudrun not as ' Ruth but as a 'treacherous* personality. Thus, Gudrun unconsciously does not see Ursula as her sister but as a female. Hermione perceives both Gudrun's sensual appeal to her sister and Ursula's helplessness to prevent the passionate clinging of her sister. The second point refers to Gerald seeing with pleasure the mockery of Gudrun's cleaving to Naomi. He does not see Ursula. He only sees in Gudrun the woman who attracts his maleness. The final point relates to Birkin who not only fails to see both Naomi and Ruth: he only sees Ursula's defense of herself as woman. She is ready to flourish as the woman he needs and craves. Despite the fact that the men have failed to see the ambiguity of Gudrun's passion for Ursula, it seems to me that this dance symbolically presents the disguised woman-to-woman relation. Besides, I think that in presenting Gudrun as the 'scapegoat' of this alternative Lawrence may be implying that she is more decadent than Ursula, but that both women have bisexual potentialities. Thus, this 'female bonding' plus the Blutbrtiderschaft may be seen
244 as alternatives to the relation between man and woman. And although these two alternatives have apparently failed, Lawrence does not leave the subject. The 'female bonding' is perhaps less important than the friendship between men because it is the latter which recurs in another stories. The fact that Gerald has rejected Birkin makes it clear that it is not yet the moment for Lawrence to put his finger on the scale to favor a relation between men. However, Women in Love shows that the bloodbrotherhood theme is becoming central in Lawrence's fiction. And although it does not succeed in this novel, it comes to dominate in the leadership novels represented by Aaron's Rod, Kangaroo and The Plumed Serpent. The four scenes analysed here reflect a series of consecutive defeats in Birkin's attempt to have either Ursula or Gerald. The last defeat leads Birkin to return to Ursula. The chapter "Excurse" may be called the exposition of Birkin's sins, his redemption and subsequent meeting with Ursula to assert their definitive rejection of the old world and their intention to build a new one. Birkin, in a car, takes Ursula from her school and they drive for some time to a place where they can be alone. . When they stop he gives her a gift. The importance of this gift lies in the fact that Birkin wants to start a new relation with Ursula but he gives her some second-hand rings. It is as if he did not care very much for his own intention to build a new world with Ursula. It seems that these rings are a bad omen for the couple: mainly because they are second-hand and because the • first owner has given them away. In giving the rings to Ursula, Birkin is not offering a new alternative to her but offering her an old and already used alternative. The rings may also be seen
- Page 201 and 202: 192 world is a world of dust which
- Page 203 and 204: 194 knowledge, breaks out with hars
- Page 205 and 206: up to this. One of them refers to H
- Page 207 and 208: 198 because he is no 'clone', no sl
- Page 209 and 210: 200 London bohemianism which Birkin
- Page 211 and 212: 202 dominant figure in the affair.
- Page 213 and 214: 204 course startles Gerald who cann
- Page 215 and 216: 206 in the expectancy to find a 'fo
- Page 217 and 218: 208 On the other hand, Lawrence giv
- Page 219 and 220: 210 they never did in Thomas Crich'
- Page 221 and 222: 212 "Think!" he said to her', "you
- Page 223 and 224: 214 life and he even apologizes to
- Page 225 and 226: 216 see the gate shut; then Gerald
- Page 227 and 228: 218 in a fierce desire to deny the
- Page 229 and 230: 220 and for a young doctor who was
- Page 231 and 232: 222 mutual hellish recognition (p.2
- Page 233 and 234: 224 him to be. The interesting aspe
- Page 235 and 236: 226 because he thinks that people,
- Page 237 and 238: 228 polarity', or in his words: 'Wh
- Page 239 and 240: everyone develops the "river of dis
- Page 241 and 242: Ursula: '... I think that a new wor
- Page 243 and 244: atmosphere of something hidden betw
- Page 245 and 246: disguised inner selves beneath thei
- Page 247 and 248: egathers itself in the water as if
- Page 249 and 250: 240 (p.252 - My underlining). His a
- Page 251: 242 the two because somehow he acce
- Page 255 and 256: 246 energy. Hermione. That is how U
- Page 257 and 258: 248 'finger-tips'. The couple decid
- Page 259 and 260: 250 as you are always saying? You t
- Page 261 and 262: 252 turning suddenly to catch hold
- Page 263 and 264: 254 exploits Loerke and vice versa.
- Page 265 and 266: 256 which no one can escape from. H
- Page 267 and 268: 258 like nothing; she is like Geral
- Page 269 and 270: 260 shocked,to really blame Gudrun.
- Page 271 and 272: 262 can only feel the 'unison in se
- Page 273 and 274: 264 has been marked by a whole set
- Page 275 and 276: 266 be sure that she will put an en
- Page 277 and 278: unsatisfied tendencies" - I am temp
- Page 279 and 280: 270 emotionally. This may be becaus
- Page 281 and 282: 27 2 ♦ has a gun), unable to do a
- Page 283 and 284: 274 next morning he simply goes to
- Page 285 and 286: The underlined sentences are the ke
- Page 287 and 288: 278 because she is not conscious of
- Page 289 and 290: 280 to see the strange glow in his
- Page 291 and 292: 282 top, Lawrence says that March "
- Page 293 and 294: 284 owner of the house for in the m
- Page 295 and 296: 286 relationship she is going to ha
- Page 297 and 298: 288 spark, and saw the shadow of th
- Page 299 and 300: 290 masculine identification. She w
- Page 301 and 302: 292 and chiffon dresses. The Banfor
244<br />
as alternatives to the relation between man and woman.<br />
And<br />
although these two alternatives have apparently failed, Lawrence<br />
does not leave the subject.<br />
The 'female bonding' is perhaps<br />
less important than the friendship between men because it is the<br />
latter which recurs in another stories.<br />
The fact that Gerald<br />
has rejected<br />
Birkin makes it clear that it is not yet the<br />
moment for Lawrence to put his finger on the scale to favor a<br />
relation between men.<br />
However, Women in Love shows that the<br />
bloodbrotherhood theme is becoming central in Lawrence's<br />
fiction.<br />
And although it does not succeed in this novel, it<br />
comes to dominate in the leadership novels represented by<br />
Aaron's Rod, Kangaroo and The Plumed Serpent.<br />
The four scenes analysed here reflect a series of<br />
consecutive defeats in Birkin's attempt to have either Ursula or<br />
Gerald. The last defeat leads Birkin to return to Ursula. The<br />
chapter "Excurse" may be called the exposition of Birkin's sins,<br />
his redemption and subsequent meeting with Ursula to assert their<br />
definitive rejection of the old world and their intention to<br />
build a new one.<br />
Birkin, in a car, takes Ursula from her school and they<br />
drive for some time to a place where they can be alone. . When<br />
they stop he gives her a gift.<br />
The importance of this gift lies<br />
in the fact that Birkin wants to start a new relation with<br />
Ursula but he gives her some second-hand rings.<br />
It is as if he<br />
did not care very much for his own intention to build a new<br />
world with Ursula.<br />
It seems that these rings are a bad omen for<br />
the couple: mainly because they are second-hand and because the •<br />
first owner has given them away.<br />
In giving the rings to Ursula,<br />
Birkin is not offering a new alternative to her but offering her<br />
an old and already used alternative.<br />
The rings may also be seen