RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE

RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE

repositorio.ufsc.br
from repositorio.ufsc.br More from this publisher
29.12.2013 Views

243 dangerous helplessness, as if she were helplessly weighted, and unreleased" (ibid). Gerald and Birkin apparently fail to see the ambiguity in the dancers' behaviour: Gerald was excited by the desperate cleaving of Gudrun to Naomi. The essence of that female, subterranean recklessness and mockery penetrated his blood. He could not forget Gudrun's lifted, offered, cleaving reckless, yet withal mocking weight. And Birkin, watching like a hermit crab from its hole, had seen the brilliant frustration and helplessness of Ursula. She was rich, full of dangerous power. She was like a strange unconscious bud of powerful womanhood. He was unconsciously drawn to her. She was his future (pp.84-5). This long passage plus Hermione's observation deserves careful comment. The first point relates to Hermione's perspicacity in seeing Gudrun not as ' Ruth but as a 'treacherous* personality. Thus, Gudrun unconsciously does not see Ursula as her sister but as a female. Hermione perceives both Gudrun's sensual appeal to her sister and Ursula's helplessness to prevent the passionate clinging of her sister. The second point refers to Gerald seeing with pleasure the mockery of Gudrun's cleaving to Naomi. He does not see Ursula. He only sees in Gudrun the woman who attracts his maleness. The final point relates to Birkin who not only fails to see both Naomi and Ruth: he only sees Ursula's defense of herself as woman. She is ready to flourish as the woman he needs and craves. Despite the fact that the men have failed to see the ambiguity of Gudrun's passion for Ursula, it seems to me that this dance symbolically presents the disguised woman-to-woman relation. Besides, I think that in presenting Gudrun as the 'scapegoat' of this alternative Lawrence may be implying that she is more decadent than Ursula, but that both women have bisexual potentialities. Thus, this 'female bonding' plus the Blutbrtiderschaft may be seen

244 as alternatives to the relation between man and woman. And although these two alternatives have apparently failed, Lawrence does not leave the subject. The 'female bonding' is perhaps less important than the friendship between men because it is the latter which recurs in another stories. The fact that Gerald has rejected Birkin makes it clear that it is not yet the moment for Lawrence to put his finger on the scale to favor a relation between men. However, Women in Love shows that the bloodbrotherhood theme is becoming central in Lawrence's fiction. And although it does not succeed in this novel, it comes to dominate in the leadership novels represented by Aaron's Rod, Kangaroo and The Plumed Serpent. The four scenes analysed here reflect a series of consecutive defeats in Birkin's attempt to have either Ursula or Gerald. The last defeat leads Birkin to return to Ursula. The chapter "Excurse" may be called the exposition of Birkin's sins, his redemption and subsequent meeting with Ursula to assert their definitive rejection of the old world and their intention to build a new one. Birkin, in a car, takes Ursula from her school and they drive for some time to a place where they can be alone. . When they stop he gives her a gift. The importance of this gift lies in the fact that Birkin wants to start a new relation with Ursula but he gives her some second-hand rings. It is as if he did not care very much for his own intention to build a new world with Ursula. It seems that these rings are a bad omen for the couple: mainly because they are second-hand and because the • first owner has given them away. In giving the rings to Ursula, Birkin is not offering a new alternative to her but offering her an old and already used alternative. The rings may also be seen

244<br />

as alternatives to the relation between man and woman.<br />

And<br />

although these two alternatives have apparently failed, Lawrence<br />

does not leave the subject.<br />

The 'female bonding' is perhaps<br />

less important than the friendship between men because it is the<br />

latter which recurs in another stories.<br />

The fact that Gerald<br />

has rejected<br />

Birkin makes it clear that it is not yet the<br />

moment for Lawrence to put his finger on the scale to favor a<br />

relation between men.<br />

However, Women in Love shows that the<br />

bloodbrotherhood theme is becoming central in Lawrence's<br />

fiction.<br />

And although it does not succeed in this novel, it<br />

comes to dominate in the leadership novels represented by<br />

Aaron's Rod, Kangaroo and The Plumed Serpent.<br />

The four scenes analysed here reflect a series of<br />

consecutive defeats in Birkin's attempt to have either Ursula or<br />

Gerald. The last defeat leads Birkin to return to Ursula. The<br />

chapter "Excurse" may be called the exposition of Birkin's sins,<br />

his redemption and subsequent meeting with Ursula to assert their<br />

definitive rejection of the old world and their intention to<br />

build a new one.<br />

Birkin, in a car, takes Ursula from her school and they<br />

drive for some time to a place where they can be alone. . When<br />

they stop he gives her a gift.<br />

The importance of this gift lies<br />

in the fact that Birkin wants to start a new relation with<br />

Ursula but he gives her some second-hand rings.<br />

It is as if he<br />

did not care very much for his own intention to build a new<br />

world with Ursula.<br />

It seems that these rings are a bad omen for<br />

the couple: mainly because they are second-hand and because the •<br />

first owner has given them away.<br />

In giving the rings to Ursula,<br />

Birkin is not offering a new alternative to her but offering her<br />

an old and already used alternative.<br />

The rings may also be seen

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!