RELATIONS OF DOMINANCE AND EQUALITY IN D. H. LAWRENCE

182
dead.
The only part of him which is still alive is his body.
He is still "nothing" and as soon as the lovers meet again, the
persistent idea is that Ursula is still the strongest, the
domineering female:
In [Skrebensky's] dark, subterranean, male soul,
he was kneeling before her, darkly exposing
himself. She quivered, the dark flame ran over her.
He was waiting at her feet. He was helpless, at
her mercy... (p.443).
And this is also the pattern Of The Trespasser and the early
fiction in general.
Lawrence does not seem to blame the woman's
strength, but the man's weakness at this point.
Ursula and Skrebensky's re-encounter is again the encounter
of their sensual beings.
The difference now is seen in terms of
Ursula's "cansuntnation with darkness".
She seems not to want to
destroy her lover. She would rather be 'destroyed' by him. It
is the consuxnmation of the flesh.
One may say that Ursula looks
like her mother.in her thirst for sensual fulfilment with Will:
[Skrebensky] seemed like the living darkness
upon her, she was in the embrace of the strong
darkness... He kissed her, and she quivered as
if she were being destroyed, shattered. The
lighted vessel vibrated, and broke in her soul,
the light fell, struggled, and went dark. She was
all dark, will-less, having only the receptive
will (p.446).
This can be seen as the opposite of her moon-hard mood: the
second affair begins with the sense that there might be a balance
after all (at least in the sense that the couples always have
polarized feelings, they are never the same).
Apart from the "consuiri&tion with darkness" there is nothing
to keep Skrebensky with Ursula.
Their minds are completely
separate.
Ursula still criticizes him and his moral emptiness
and snobbery because he wants to go to India and live among the