Walking Corpses & Conscious Plants: Possibilist Ecologies in ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Bingham 8 Worlds, modal realism is ultimately a strategy of determining the verisimilitude of intentionality as well as other theories which seek to define subjective experience. Modal realism hinges upon the claim that there are countless possible worlds which are real as experienced actuality * ; and each differs only in content rather than kind. Each of these possibilia is then an irreducible entity and therefore is isolated from all others spatially and causally: ...there are no spatiotemporal relations at all between things that belong to different worlds. Nor does anything that happens in one world cause anything to happen at another. Nor do they overlap; they have no parts in common, with the exception, perhaps, of immanent universals exercising their characteristic privilege of repeated occurrence. (Lewis 2) Even though external environments change as we move from one possible world to another, there remains some constancy which repeatedly manifests within subjects. Possible worlds are engaged in the realm of actuality; so even though there may not be a direct causal relationship between these possible worlds and ours, there is certainly a reason why they are imagined. This reasoning suggests a desire to identify specific natural qualities associated with conscious existence. Such considerations act as tests for moral ideologies or ethical beliefs. Interrogating these concepts can reveal when there are discrepancies between intentions and actions, or behaviors and their justifications—a valuable exercise especially in times of war and economic crisis. Lewis describes possible worlds as particularly useful devices for these types of comparison: “The other worlds provide a frame of reference whereby we can charaterise our own world” (Lewis 22). This referential function is especially valuable in political discourse. When we can identify familiarity within spaces that appear totally closed from our own experience, we can reconsider subjectivity and address events or behaviors which are incongruous with * The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy provided this definition: “Actuality for x is the realm that includes x. Actuality for us is the maximal spatiotemporally related whole of which we are (mereologically) part.”
Bingham 9 beliefs. Seeing a possible world envisioned in the space of the world we inhabit, yet apart from our experience of the actuality of that world, promotes our desire to identify with it. We are trained to see particular sets of meaning in any image, searching first for familiarity so we can determine the extent of our difference from this alternate reality. According to David Kellogg Lewis' theory of “modal realism,” there are countless possible worlds each real as actuality because they are all self-contained. Each and every one of these possibilia is spatio-temporally and causally isolated (Lewis 2). These spaces can represent alternate realities where only certain variables distinguishing them from actuality have been changed. Hence, conceiving these spaces helps those who engage them to better understand their own perception of actuality and existence. According to Lewis, “One way to tell the truth about complicated phenomena is to say how they resemble simpler idealisations...there is no doubt that we do find it much easier to tell the truth if we drag in truthlike [sic] fiction.” (Lewis 26) Possible worlds like those envisioned by Kirkman and brought to life by the attention of a captive audience can reduce complex issues like extreme permeating violence to their most basic essence. Thus possibilia remove factors like how features such as national affiliation or race differentially affect violence, factors which provide rationales/excuses for individuals to sidestep or avoid straightforward analysis of prevailing conditions. Instead, taking Lewis' model and considering the world of The Walking Dead as a total entity which can be used as a point of reference, it is plausible to conduct an interrogation of the causes and consequences of severe violence. Further support for this argument comes from the literary criticism of author Mark Ledbetter, whose book, Victims and the Postmodern Narrative, Or, Doing Violence to the Body: An Ethic of Reading and Writing describes
Page 1 and 2: Walking Corpses & Conscious Plants:
Page 3 and 4: Bingham 3 I owe an extreme debt of
Page 5 and 6: Bingham 5 Introduction My project e
Page 7: Bingham 7 personal growth through t
Page 11 and 12: Bingham 11 zombie exceeds death as
Page 13 and 14: Bingham 13 the validity of singular
Page 15 and 16: Bingham 15 Chapter I: The History o
Page 17 and 18: Bingham 17 Swamp Thing. According t
Page 19 and 20: Bingham 19 instructional profession
Page 21 and 22: Bingham 21 Another artist who worke
Page 23 and 24: Bingham 23 action into panels (Cohn
Page 25 and 26: Bingham 25 sponsorship. He designed
Page 27 and 28: Bingham 27 Charles Moulton. Marston
Page 29 and 30: Bingham 29 Frederick Wertham prompt
Page 31 and 32: Bingham 31 “graphic novel” was
Page 33 and 34: Bingham 33 what is or isn't a graph
Page 35 and 36: Bingham 35 Works Cited Benton, Mike
Page 37 and 38: Bingham 37 Chapter II: Transfusion
Page 39 and 40: Bingham 39 conflict or war. This ex
Page 41 and 42: Bingham 41 and dismember other bodi
Page 43 and 44: Bingham 43 bodies to pieces. (Cavar
Page 45 and 46: Bingham 45 thus creating an affecti
Page 47 and 48: Bingham 47 margins. Unlike the four
Page 49 and 50: Bingham 49 implicates the role of o
Page 51 and 52: Bingham 51 demonstrates that he is
Page 53 and 54: Bingham 53 Amy (Figure 10 & 11). Th
Page 55 and 56: Bingham 55 being who has done nothi
Page 57 and 58: Bingham 57 transgressions, this ima
Page 59 and 60:
Bingham 59 Returning to the full pa
Page 61 and 62:
Bingham 61 order” (200). The prem
Page 63 and 64:
Bingham 63 possession, selling, ste
Page 65 and 66:
Bingham 65 with yourself? Not me. I
Page 67 and 68:
Bingham 67 immediate proximity of t
Page 69 and 70:
Bingham 69 experience, or the human
Page 71 and 72:
Bingham 71 sentences Thomas to hang
Page 73 and 74:
Bingham 73
Page 75 and 76:
Bingham 74 Works Cited Berger, Arth
Page 77 and 78:
Bingham 76 APPENDIX A Fig. 1. Openi
Page 79 and 80:
Bingham 78 Fig. 7. Fig. 8.
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Fig. 38. Bingham 94
Page 97 and 98:
Fig. 41. Bingham 96
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Bingham 101 Chapter III: Speaking o
Page 103 and 104:
Bingham 103 preserved, yet not enti
Page 105 and 106:
Bingham 105 increasingly more discu
Page 107 and 108:
Bingham 107 Wrightson only drew the
Page 109 and 110:
Bingham 109 by the inexorable progr
Page 111 and 112:
Bingham 111 appeared. Though the tw
Page 113 and 114:
Bingham 113 General Avery Carlton S
Page 115 and 116:
Bingham 115 dismembered body which
Page 117 and 118:
Bingham 117 sheltered from or not e
Page 119 and 120:
Bingham 119 authority. This subtle,
Page 121 and 122:
Bingham 121 the center of the page
Page 123 and 124:
Bingham 123 affect. Apart from this
Page 125 and 126:
Bingham 125 acts of fictional chara
Page 127 and 128:
Bingham 127 resemblance, their comp
Page 129 and 130:
Bingham 129 experience. The creator
Page 131 and 132:
Bingham 131 justified. What follows
Page 133 and 134:
Bingham 133 present to witness it t
Page 135 and 136:
Bingham 135 If we read each charact
Page 137 and 138:
Bingham 137 able to issue an urgent
Page 139 and 140:
1 According to comics historian Rob
Page 141 and 142:
Bingham 140 - Interview by David Ro
show all

Walking Corpses & Conscious Plants: Possibilist Ecologies in ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?