29.12.2013 Views

A Deterministic Evaluation of eismic Fidelity using Velocity Modeling ...

A Deterministic Evaluation of eismic Fidelity using Velocity Modeling ...

A Deterministic Evaluation of eismic Fidelity using Velocity Modeling ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ased data, indicating higher fidelity because s<strong>eismic</strong> events are in their proper x, y, and z<br />

space. A section perpendicular to the traverse in Figure 65 also images fault planes that<br />

are more coherent in the well-based section. Another interesting observation is the event<br />

that intersects the Anahuac well pick when followed eastward merges into an event that is<br />

salt on the PSTM (Figure 65). Observing the depth sections <strong>of</strong> both velocity models also<br />

provides differences in the data set for comparison (Figure 66). Imaging <strong>of</strong> faults and<br />

the salt are more coherent in the depth slice from the well-based PSDM than from that <strong>of</strong><br />

the prestack time migrated velocity model PSDM.<br />

Another illustration <strong>of</strong> the improved fidelity provided by the PSDM is from the drilling <strong>of</strong><br />

a bright spot interpreted with the PSTM (Figure 67) near the salt flank. A comparison <strong>of</strong><br />

the PSDM from both the well-based velocity model and the prestack time migrated<br />

velocity model show that there is no bright spot. Analysis <strong>of</strong> the PSDM shows that there<br />

is salt at that location, although the impedance contrast is not as great as it is shallower<br />

(Figure 68). There are two issues in the differences <strong>of</strong> the PSTM and the PSDM that<br />

further demonstrate the improvements in imaging provided by the well-based PSDM.<br />

The first is the bright spot that appears in the PSTM but is not in the PSDM. An<br />

explanation for this is that incorrect modeling <strong>of</strong> velocities close to the salt flank resulted<br />

in constructive interference <strong>of</strong> noise. This explanation is appealing because <strong>of</strong> the close<br />

proximity to the salt and the inherent difficulty <strong>of</strong> imaging salt flanks with PSTM. Both<br />

<strong>of</strong> the PSDM s<strong>eismic</strong> volumes do not image a bright spot demonstrating the ability <strong>of</strong><br />

PSDM to image in areas <strong>of</strong> strong lateral velocity changes. The second issue is the<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!