29.12.2013 Views

News Letter 1941 Jul-Dec - Air Force Historical Studies Office

News Letter 1941 Jul-Dec - Air Force Historical Studies Office

News Letter 1941 Jul-Dec - Air Force Historical Studies Office

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

furways<br />

.1 rarnc \.JUIIUUI<br />

AERIAL TRAFFIC COPS GET TOGETHE'R<br />

By Major A. B. McMullen<br />

THE War, Navy and Commerce Departments, (the<br />

latter including the Civil Aeronautics Board<br />

and the Civil Aeronautics Administration) recently<br />

indicated the ir interest and concern over air traffic<br />

by the joint establishment of the Interdepartmental<br />

<strong>Air</strong> Traffic Control Board.<br />

Each agency has one member on this Board. Mr.<br />

Earl Ward represents the Civil Aeronautics Administration,<br />

Mr. E. N. Ellington the Civil Aeronautics<br />

Board, Lieut. Comdr. John C. Crommelin the<br />

Navy Department. The writer represents the War<br />

Department --and at the present time is Cha Lrman of<br />

the Board.<br />

The Board has no executive authority. It acts<br />

as a clearing house for not only air traffic problems<br />

but reviews applications and makes recommendations<br />

with respect to the use of the navigable<br />

air space by other activities-osuch as artillery<br />

firing training areas, searchlight and barrage<br />

balloon training areas, the location of aerial<br />

bombing and gunnery ranges, flight training<br />

fields, etc.<br />

During the recent expansion of the Army <strong>Air</strong><br />

<strong>Force</strong>s, tactical or training units have been located<br />

on Municipal or Civil <strong>Air</strong>ports, many of<br />

which were airline terminals already faced with<br />

serious traffic problems.<br />

P-39's And Clbs Don't Mix<br />

The officials responsible for the location of<br />

these military units on civil airports realize the<br />

fact that 300 MPH bombers and 400 MPH pursuit<br />

planes cannot operate safely or efficiently from<br />

fields also used by small aircraft of the Cub and<br />

Aeronca class. Additional airports are, therefore,<br />

being constructed largely with Federal funds<br />

in these communities for private and commercial<br />

flying. This procedure confirms an opinion I have<br />

had for many years, namely, that more--properly<br />

placed and better designed--airports would lessen<br />

the need for regulations governing air traffic.<br />

The air carriers and some non-scheduled civil<br />

aircraft will, however, continue to utilize most<br />

of these jointly occupied airports and it has become<br />

necessary to provide a satisfactory means for<br />

directing both civil and military traffic on--and<br />

in the vicinity of--these air terminals.<br />

At firs t g lance this wou Id not appear to present<br />

any unusual problems, but War Department<br />

regulations and the principles of military command<br />

OCTOBER /9-11 11<br />

prohibit the commanding officer at these stations<br />

from delegating the responsibility for the safety<br />

and operation of the planes in his command to an<br />

employee of another department--particularly a<br />

civil agency not familiar with the problems peculiar<br />

to military aircraft operation. Therefore,<br />

both military and Civil Aeronautics Administration<br />

airport control personnel will be employed in the<br />

same towers at these jointly occupied airports.<br />

<strong>Air</strong>ports Join Federal Network<br />

The eM and the <strong>Air</strong> Corps are assuming the responsibility<br />

for the operation of air traffic control<br />

towers at 39 municipal airports as rapidly<br />

as personne 1 and equipment can be obtained. Thus<br />

a precedent has been established and the welding<br />

of airport and airway traffic control with the<br />

operation of both by the Federal Government has<br />

taken a big step forward. Only those civil air.<br />

ports that are occupied by Army or Navy tactical<br />

or training units will be taken into the Federally<br />

operated network at the present time.<br />

Except during a military emergency determined by<br />

the station commander, the Senior CAA Operator<br />

will be in charge of the control of all traffic in<br />

the airport control zone. When both civil and<br />

military aircraft are involved, the CAA operator<br />

will issue instructions to Army or Navy aircraft<br />

only after consultation with the service operator.<br />

Normally, Army and Navy tower operators will not<br />

issue instruction~ to civil aircraft--and in no<br />

case will Inst r.. ~ons be issued to civil aircraft<br />

by service tower operators unless they hold a CAA<br />

-<strong>Air</strong> Traffic Control Operator Certificate."<br />

The commanding officer of the <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong>s station<br />

may assume complete control and supervision<br />

of the airport traffic control tower and all air<br />

traffic within the airport control zone when the<br />

mil itary s Huat ion demands such act ion. When such<br />

control is assumed, the commanding officer shall<br />

assume full responsibility for the safety of all<br />

air traffic in the airport control zone. During<br />

such periods, the eM control tower operator shall<br />

~irect civil air traffic as requested by the commanding<br />

officer.<br />

Conditions To Be Determined<br />

Just what military situations may arise which<br />

will require the commanding officer to assume control<br />

of air traffic in the vicinity of the airport<br />

no one can predict at the present time. It is<br />

possible that all traffic in the vicinity of the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!