News Letter 1941 Jul-Dec - Air Force Historical Studies Office
News Letter 1941 Jul-Dec - Air Force Historical Studies Office
News Letter 1941 Jul-Dec - Air Force Historical Studies Office
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
furways<br />
.1 rarnc \.JUIIUUI<br />
AERIAL TRAFFIC COPS GET TOGETHE'R<br />
By Major A. B. McMullen<br />
THE War, Navy and Commerce Departments, (the<br />
latter including the Civil Aeronautics Board<br />
and the Civil Aeronautics Administration) recently<br />
indicated the ir interest and concern over air traffic<br />
by the joint establishment of the Interdepartmental<br />
<strong>Air</strong> Traffic Control Board.<br />
Each agency has one member on this Board. Mr.<br />
Earl Ward represents the Civil Aeronautics Administration,<br />
Mr. E. N. Ellington the Civil Aeronautics<br />
Board, Lieut. Comdr. John C. Crommelin the<br />
Navy Department. The writer represents the War<br />
Department --and at the present time is Cha Lrman of<br />
the Board.<br />
The Board has no executive authority. It acts<br />
as a clearing house for not only air traffic problems<br />
but reviews applications and makes recommendations<br />
with respect to the use of the navigable<br />
air space by other activities-osuch as artillery<br />
firing training areas, searchlight and barrage<br />
balloon training areas, the location of aerial<br />
bombing and gunnery ranges, flight training<br />
fields, etc.<br />
During the recent expansion of the Army <strong>Air</strong><br />
<strong>Force</strong>s, tactical or training units have been located<br />
on Municipal or Civil <strong>Air</strong>ports, many of<br />
which were airline terminals already faced with<br />
serious traffic problems.<br />
P-39's And Clbs Don't Mix<br />
The officials responsible for the location of<br />
these military units on civil airports realize the<br />
fact that 300 MPH bombers and 400 MPH pursuit<br />
planes cannot operate safely or efficiently from<br />
fields also used by small aircraft of the Cub and<br />
Aeronca class. Additional airports are, therefore,<br />
being constructed largely with Federal funds<br />
in these communities for private and commercial<br />
flying. This procedure confirms an opinion I have<br />
had for many years, namely, that more--properly<br />
placed and better designed--airports would lessen<br />
the need for regulations governing air traffic.<br />
The air carriers and some non-scheduled civil<br />
aircraft will, however, continue to utilize most<br />
of these jointly occupied airports and it has become<br />
necessary to provide a satisfactory means for<br />
directing both civil and military traffic on--and<br />
in the vicinity of--these air terminals.<br />
At firs t g lance this wou Id not appear to present<br />
any unusual problems, but War Department<br />
regulations and the principles of military command<br />
OCTOBER /9-11 11<br />
prohibit the commanding officer at these stations<br />
from delegating the responsibility for the safety<br />
and operation of the planes in his command to an<br />
employee of another department--particularly a<br />
civil agency not familiar with the problems peculiar<br />
to military aircraft operation. Therefore,<br />
both military and Civil Aeronautics Administration<br />
airport control personnel will be employed in the<br />
same towers at these jointly occupied airports.<br />
<strong>Air</strong>ports Join Federal Network<br />
The eM and the <strong>Air</strong> Corps are assuming the responsibility<br />
for the operation of air traffic control<br />
towers at 39 municipal airports as rapidly<br />
as personne 1 and equipment can be obtained. Thus<br />
a precedent has been established and the welding<br />
of airport and airway traffic control with the<br />
operation of both by the Federal Government has<br />
taken a big step forward. Only those civil air.<br />
ports that are occupied by Army or Navy tactical<br />
or training units will be taken into the Federally<br />
operated network at the present time.<br />
Except during a military emergency determined by<br />
the station commander, the Senior CAA Operator<br />
will be in charge of the control of all traffic in<br />
the airport control zone. When both civil and<br />
military aircraft are involved, the CAA operator<br />
will issue instructions to Army or Navy aircraft<br />
only after consultation with the service operator.<br />
Normally, Army and Navy tower operators will not<br />
issue instruction~ to civil aircraft--and in no<br />
case will Inst r.. ~ons be issued to civil aircraft<br />
by service tower operators unless they hold a CAA<br />
-<strong>Air</strong> Traffic Control Operator Certificate."<br />
The commanding officer of the <strong>Air</strong> <strong>Force</strong>s station<br />
may assume complete control and supervision<br />
of the airport traffic control tower and all air<br />
traffic within the airport control zone when the<br />
mil itary s Huat ion demands such act ion. When such<br />
control is assumed, the commanding officer shall<br />
assume full responsibility for the safety of all<br />
air traffic in the airport control zone. During<br />
such periods, the eM control tower operator shall<br />
~irect civil air traffic as requested by the commanding<br />
officer.<br />
Conditions To Be Determined<br />
Just what military situations may arise which<br />
will require the commanding officer to assume control<br />
of air traffic in the vicinity of the airport<br />
no one can predict at the present time. It is<br />
possible that all traffic in the vicinity of the