29.12.2013 Views

the romantic theory of understanding and ... - socioumane.ro

the romantic theory of understanding and ... - socioumane.ro

the romantic theory of understanding and ... - socioumane.ro

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Annales Philosophici 6 (2013) Navid Afsharzadeh, pp. 11-18<br />

revealed <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> unstable nature <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> language <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> linked this fact directly to <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> finitude <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> human<br />

consciousness. The Jena <st<strong>ro</strong>ng><strong>ro</strong>mantic</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>s <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> especially Friedrich Schlegel, by emphasizing <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

limits <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>underst<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>ing</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> took an account <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> incomprehensibility <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> investigated about <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

element <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> non-<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>underst<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>ing</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> which occurs in every act <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>underst<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>ing</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>.<br />

Such convictions along with <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>ir anti-foundationalism led <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>m to indorse <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

fragmentary characteristic <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> human consciousness <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> secure <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>ir turn toward a new style <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

philosophical writing. Thus, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng><strong>ro</strong>mantic</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> fragment was born as an i<strong>ro</strong>nic genre that contains a<br />

combination <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> poetry <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> philosophy. The aes<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>tics <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> fragmentary writing indicates an<br />

internal alteration which hovers between self-creation <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> self-destruction. Therefore <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

<st<strong>ro</strong>ng><strong>ro</strong>mantic</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> work challenges <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> idea <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> totality <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> embraces its own imperfection. Although<br />

this attitude will lead to <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> work's unworking, by ignoring <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> "final word", it leaves <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> work<br />

open to future. This is <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> work <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng><strong>ro</strong>mantic</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> work.<br />

References<br />

Behler, Ernest (1993). German Romantic Literary Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University<br />

Press<br />

Beiser, Fredrick C. (2002). German Idealism: Struggle against Subjectivism, Massachusetts:<br />

Harvard University Press<br />

Beiser, Fredrick C. (2003). The Romantic Imperative: The Concept <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Early German<br />

Romanticism, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press<br />

Bernstein. J. M. (2003). Classic <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Romantic German Aes<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>tics, Cambridge: Cambridge<br />

University Press<br />

Bowie, Andrew (2002). F<strong>ro</strong>m <st<strong>ro</strong>ng><strong>ro</strong>mantic</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>ism to critical <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>ory: <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> philosophy <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> German<br />

literary <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>ory, London: Taylor & Francis e-Library<br />

Bowie, Andrew (1993). Aes<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>tics <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Subjectivity: F<strong>ro</strong>m Kant to Nietzsche, Manchester:<br />

Routledge<br />

Corby, James (2010). The Eu<strong>ro</strong>pean Legacy, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 751–768. Emphasising <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Positive: The Critical Role <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Schlegel’s Aes<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>tics, Routledge<br />

Critchley, Simon (2004). Very Little – Almost Nothing: Death, Philosophy, Literature,<br />

London: Routledge<br />

Frank, Manfred (2004). The Philosophical Foundations <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Early German Romanticism, trans.<br />

Elizabeth Millan-Zaibert, Albany: State University <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> New York Press<br />

Hammermeister, Kai (2002). The German Aes<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>tic Tradition, Cambridge: Cambridge<br />

University Press<br />

Lacoue-Labar<st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng>, Phillipe, <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Jean-Luc Nancy (1988). The Literary Absolute: The Theory <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

Literature in German Romanticism, trans. Philip Bernard, Albany: state university <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng><br />

New Yorke press<br />

Lyne, Ian (1995). Walter Benjamin <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Romanticism: The Romantic Tradition, Coventry:<br />

P<strong>ro</strong>quest<br />

Millan-Zaibert, Elizabeth (2007). Friedrich Schlegel <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Emergence <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Romantic<br />

Philosophy, Albany: State University <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> New York Press<br />

Schlegel, Friedrich Von. (1991). Philosophical Fragments, trans. Peter Firchow, Minneapolis:<br />

University <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Minnesota Press<br />

Schlegel, Friedrich Von. (1971). Friedrich Schlegel’s Lucinde <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Fragments, trans. Peter<br />

Firchow, Minneapolis: University <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Minnesota Press<br />

Strathman, Christopher A. (2006). Romantic Poetry <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>and</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>the</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> Fragmentary Imperative:<br />

Schlegel, By<strong>ro</strong>n, Joyce, Blanchot, Albany: State University <st<strong>ro</strong>ng>of</st<strong>ro</strong>ng> New York Press<br />

18

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!